Thomas Gummerer <t.gumme...@gmail.com> writes: > On 04/10, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> * tg/stash-in-c-show-default-to-p-fix (2019-03-21) 1 commit >> (merged to 'next' on 2019-04-10 at 9489a31a36) >> + stash: setup default diff output format if necessary >> (this branch uses ps/stash-in-c; is tangled with js/stash-in-c-pathspec-fix >> and tb/stash-in-c-unused-param-fix.) >> >> A regression fix. >> >> Will merge to 'master'. > > ps/stash-in-c is still marked as "Will cook in 'next'", so I assume > since this is fixing a regression in that topic, "Will merge to > 'master'" is a mistake here?
Thanks. I actually intend to unfreeze ps/stash-in-c and topics that fix it, now this topic is also ready to go. So I'd rather mark them all for 'master', and give all of them exposure so that we can smoke out remaining issues, if any.
