Jeff King writes:
> So that explains that bug (as a side note, you might think that if we
> are flipping return values, lots of things would fail when they ask "do
> we have this packed object" and it erroneously says "yes". But that does
> not happen. The wrong return value comes from freshening
On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 09:42:49PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 03:22:10PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > This applied on top of 'maint' (which does have c40fdd01) makes the
> > test #9 (prune: do not prune detached HEAD with no reflog) fail.
>
> I'll fix the bone-headed
On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 03:22:10PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> This applied on top of 'maint' (which does have c40fdd01) makes the
> test #9 (prune: do not prune detached HEAD with no reflog) fail.
I'll fix the bone-headed error returns that René noticed and double
check that they were the com
Am 05.10.2014 um 00:22 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Jeff King writes:
There's quite a lot of patches here, but most of them are preparatory
cleanups. The meat is in patches 13, 15, and 16.
[01/16]: foreach_alt_odb: propagate return value from callback
[02/16]: isxdigit: cast input to unsigne
Jeff King writes:
> There's quite a lot of patches here, but most of them are preparatory
> cleanups. The meat is in patches 13, 15, and 16.
>
> [01/16]: foreach_alt_odb: propagate return value from callback
> [02/16]: isxdigit: cast input to unsigned char
> [03/16]: object_array: factor ou
Jeff King writes:
> ... The objects are removed by prune, which doesn't realize
> that they are part of an ongoing operation. Prune uses the filesystem
> mtime to determine this, but we are not very thorough in making sure
> that is kept up to date.
The whole series looked quite sensible. Thank
6 matches
Mail list logo
