Hi Rohit
On 10/06/2019 14:25, Rohit Ashiwal wrote:
> Hi Phillip
>
> On 2019-06-10 10:39 UTC Phillip Wood wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rohit
>>
>> On 10/06/2019 06:13, Rohit Ashiwal wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>> Firstly, signature of `create_seq_dir` doesn't allow us to call
>>> `sequencer_get_last_command()`. Cha
Phillip Wood writes:
>> Firstly, signature of `create_seq_dir` doesn't allow us to call
>> `sequencer_get_last_command()`. Changing that for the sake of a
>> better error message is too much task for this patch as it is a
>> subject of discussion on its own.
>
> There is only one caller and it al
Hi Phillip
On 2019-06-10 10:39 UTC Phillip Wood wrote:
>
>Hi Rohit
>
>On 10/06/2019 06:13, Rohit Ashiwal wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>> Firstly, signature of `create_seq_dir` doesn't allow us to call
>> `sequencer_get_last_command()`. Changing that for the sake of a
>> better error message is too much tas
Hi Rohit
On 10/06/2019 06:13, Rohit Ashiwal wrote:
> Hi Philip
>
> On 2019-06-09 17:52 UTC Phillip Wood wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rohit
>>
>> Congratulations on your first GSoC patch series!
>
> Thank you very much :)
>
>> On 08/06/2019 20:19, Rohit Ashiwal wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> @@ -2655,6 +2655,7 @@ sta
Hi Philip
On 2019-06-09 17:52 UTC Phillip Wood wrote:
>
> Hi Rohit
>
> Congratulations on your first GSoC patch series!
Thank you very much :)
> On 08/06/2019 20:19, Rohit Ashiwal wrote:
> > [...]
> > @@ -2655,6 +2655,7 @@ static int create_seq_dir(void)
> > if (file_exists(git_path_seq_di
Hi Rohit
Congratulations on your first GSoC patch series!
On 08/06/2019 20:19, Rohit Ashiwal wrote:
> In the case of merge conflicts, while performing a revert, we are
> currently advised to use `git cherry-pick --`
> of which --continue is incompatible for continuing the revert.
> Introduce a se
6 matches
Mail list logo
