Re: [Suggestion] Add Skip for t9020

2019-02-22 Thread Jeff King
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 03:58:37PM -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote: > > While this is a bit of a hack, it might be useful for skipping t9020 in > > environments where the svn.remote package is not installed. I can make this > > into a patch if this style is reasonable - guessing probably not and that

RE: [Suggestion] Add Skip for t9020

2019-02-21 Thread Randall S. Becker
On February 21, 2019 19:47, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Randall S. Becker wrote: > > > While this is a bit of a hack, it might be useful for skipping t9020 > > in environments where the svn.remote package is not installed. I can > > make this into a patch if this style is reasonable - guessing proba

Re: [Suggestion] Add Skip for t9020

2019-02-21 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi, Randall S. Becker wrote: > While this is a bit of a hack, it might be useful for skipping t9020 in > environments where the svn.remote package is not installed. I can make this > into a patch if this style is reasonable - guessing probably not and that > the REMOTE_SVN test should go elsewher

Re: [Suggestion] Add Skip for t9020

2019-02-21 Thread Todd Zullinger
Hi, Randall S. Becker wrote: > On February 21, 2019 15:00, I wrote: >> t9020 subtests 1,2,5,6 failed - Not new. unsurprising as there is no SVN or >> perl with SVN module on platform. It might be useful to have a detection to >> skip of Perl SVN is not present. > > While this is a bit of a hack,