On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 03:58:37PM -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote: > > While this is a bit of a hack, it might be useful for skipping t9020 in > > environments where the svn.remote package is not installed. I can make this > > into a patch if this style is reasonable - guessing probably not and that > > the REMOTE_SVN test should go elsewhere if it is called that. > > Jeff King sent an RFC patch which would remove this test and > the rest of the vcs-svn experiment in August[1]. Jonathan > Nieder replied as one user who would rather see it moved to > contrib/, so it was held off. > > Whether that has any impact on adding a way to skip all the > tests here, I don't know. Maybe it's a gentle nudge in > favor of moving them to contrib?
I still hoped we could ditch them completely. :) As part of my -Wunused-parameter patches, I found that was an easy way to get rid of some warnings. But I'd be OK if they were in contrib/, too. -Peff
