Jeff King writes:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 05:35:06PM +0100, Andreas Krey wrote:
>
>> The code talks about limiting the size
>> of the rename matrix, but as far as I
>> can see, the matrix itself never exists
>> as such, and the only thing that could
>> actually overflow is the computation
>> fo
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 01:03:15PM +0100, Andreas Krey wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:33:28 +, Jeff King wrote:
> ...
> > I didn't dig in the archive, but I think we discussed the "just show
> > progress for destinations" before. The problem you run into is that the
> > items aren't a good in
Hi Jeff,
thanks for the reply!
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:33:28 +, Jeff King wrote:
...
> I didn't dig in the archive, but I think we discussed the "just show
> progress for destinations" before. The problem you run into is that the
> items aren't a good indication of the amount of work. You real
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 05:35:06PM +0100, Andreas Krey wrote:
> The code talks about limiting the size
> of the rename matrix, but as far as I
> can see, the matrix itself never exists
> as such, and the only thing that could
> actually overflow is the computation
> for the progress indication. Th
Hi all,
we also ran into the maximum rename limit
in the rename detection. (Yes, we get a lot
of rename candidates when cherry-picking
between two specific releases.)
The code talks about limiting the size
of the rename matrix, but as far as I
can see, the matrix itself never exists
as such, and
5 matches
Mail list logo
