:-)
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Martin von Zweigbergk
> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Felipe Contreras
>> wrote:
>
>>> One change splits, the other change fixes, what's wrong with that?
>>
>> I didn't say there was
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Martin von Zweigbergk
wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Felipe Contreras
> wrote:
>> One change splits, the other change fixes, what's wrong with that?
>
> I didn't say there was anything wrong. I was asking if the bug was
> there before (and I didn't s
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:33 AM, Martin von Zweigbergk
> wrote:
>> As Junio asked in the previous iteration, shouldn't this have been in
>> the first patch?
>
> No, the first patch is splitting the code without introducing any
> functi
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:33 AM, Martin von Zweigbergk
wrote:
> As Junio asked in the previous iteration, shouldn't this have been in
> the first patch?
No, the first patch is splitting the code without introducing any
functional changes.
This is fixing a bug that already exists, we could fix
As Junio asked in the previous iteration, shouldn't this have been in
the first patch?
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> We are not in am mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras
> ---
> git-rebase--cherrypick.sh | 10 ++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 d
We are not in am mode.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras
---
git-rebase--cherrypick.sh | 10 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/git-rebase--cherrypick.sh b/git-rebase--cherrypick.sh
index 51354af..2fa4993 100644
--- a/git-rebase--cherrypick.sh
+++ b/git-rebase
6 matches
Mail list logo
