On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:33 AM, Martin von Zweigbergk > <martinv...@gmail.com> wrote: >> As Junio asked in the previous iteration, shouldn't this have been in >> the first patch? > > No, the first patch is splitting the code without introducing any > functional changes. > > This is fixing a bug that already exists, we could fix it before the > split, or after, but mixing the split and the fix at the same time is > a no-no.
Oh, now I remember. I ran into that bug once. > One change splits, the other change fixes, what's wrong with that? I didn't say there was anything wrong. I was asking if the bug was there before (and I didn't see an answer when Junio asked). Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
