On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 07:27:21AM +, Eric Wong wrote:
> Jakub Narębski wrote:
> > W dniu 2016-07-22 o 17:49, larsxschnei...@gmail.com pisze:
> > > +use strict;
> > > +use warnings;
> > > +use autodie;
> >
> > autodie?
>
> "set -e" for Perl (man autodie)
>
> It's been a part of Perl for ag
W dniu 2016-07-25 o 22:09, Lars Schneider pisze:
> On 24 Jul 2016, at 22:14, Jakub Narębski wrote:
>> W dniu 2016-07-24 o 20:36, Lars Schneider pisze:
>>> On 23 Jul 2016, at 02:11, Jakub Narębski wrote:
W dniu 2016-07-22 o 17:49, larsxschnei...@gmail.com pisze:
> From: Lars Schneider
>>
W dniu 2016-07-25 o 22:16, Lars Schneider pisze:
>
> On 24 Jul 2016, at 23:30, Jakub Narębski wrote:
>
>> W dniu 2016-07-24 o 22:14, Jakub Narębski pisze:
>>> W dniu 2016-07-24 o 20:36, Lars Schneider pisze:
>>
I agree that the name is not ideal. "UseProtocol" as it is would be a
bool
W dniu 2016-07-25 o 22:32, Lars Schneider pisze:
> On 25 Jul 2016, at 01:22, Jakub Narębski wrote:
>> W dniu 2016-07-25 o 00:36, Ramsay Jones pisze:
>>> On 24/07/16 18:16, Lars Schneider wrote:
It was a conscious decision to have the `filter` talk first.
My reasoning was:
(1
On 25 Jul 2016, at 01:22, Jakub Narębski wrote:
> W dniu 2016-07-25 o 00:36, Ramsay Jones pisze:
>> On 24/07/16 18:16, Lars Schneider wrote:
>>> On 23 Jul 2016, at 01:19, Ramsay Jones wrote:
On 22/07/16 16:49, larsxschnei...@gmail.com wrote:
> [...]
> This patch adds the filter..usePro
On 25 Jul 2016, at 00:36, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> On 24/07/16 18:16, Lars Schneider wrote:
>>
>> On 23 Jul 2016, at 01:19, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>>
>>> On 22/07/16 16:49, larsxschnei...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Lars Schneider
Git's clean/smudge mechanism invokes an external filter
On 24 Jul 2016, at 23:30, Jakub Narębski wrote:
> W dniu 2016-07-24 o 22:14, Jakub Narębski pisze:
>> W dniu 2016-07-24 o 20:36, Lars Schneider pisze:
>
>>> I agree that the name is not ideal. "UseProtocol" as it is would be a
>>> boolean.
>>> I thought about "persistent" but this name wouldn
On 24 Jul 2016, at 22:14, Jakub Narębski wrote:
> W dniu 2016-07-24 o 20:36, Lars Schneider pisze:
>> On 23 Jul 2016, at 02:11, Jakub Narębski wrote:
>>> W dniu 2016-07-22 o 17:49, larsxschnei...@gmail.com pisze:
From: Lars Schneider
>>>
>>> Nb. this line is only needed if you want autho
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Lars Schneider
wrote:
>
> On 23 Jul 2016, at 10:14, Eric Wong wrote:
>
>> larsxschnei...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Please note that the protocol filters do not support stream processing
>>> with this implemenatation because the filter needs to know the length of
>>> th
Lars Schneider wrote:
> On 23 Jul 2016, at 10:14, Eric Wong wrote:
> > larsxschnei...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> +static struct cmd2process *start_protocol_filter(const char *cmd)
> >> +{
> >> + int ret = 1;
> >> + struct cmd2process *entry = NULL;
> >> + struct child_process *process = NULL;
> >
W dniu 2016-07-25 o 00:36, Ramsay Jones pisze:
> On 24/07/16 18:16, Lars Schneider wrote:
>> On 23 Jul 2016, at 01:19, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>>> On 22/07/16 16:49, larsxschnei...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
This patch adds the filter..useProtocol option which, if enabled,
keeps the external fil
On 24/07/16 18:16, Lars Schneider wrote:
>
> On 23 Jul 2016, at 01:19, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>
>> On 22/07/16 16:49, larsxschnei...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> From: Lars Schneider
>>>
>>> Git's clean/smudge mechanism invokes an external filter process for every
>>> single blob that is affected by a f
W dniu 2016-07-24 o 22:14, Jakub Narębski pisze:
> W dniu 2016-07-24 o 20:36, Lars Schneider pisze:
>> I agree that the name is not ideal. "UseProtocol" as it is would be a
>> boolean.
>> I thought about "persistent" but this name wouldn't convey the scope of the
>> persistency ("persistent for
W dniu 2016-07-24 o 20:36, Lars Schneider pisze:
> On 23 Jul 2016, at 02:11, Jakub Narębski wrote:
>> W dniu 2016-07-22 o 17:49, larsxschnei...@gmail.com pisze:
>>> From: Lars Schneider
>>
>> Nb. this line is only needed if you want author name and/or date
>> different from the email sender, or i
On 23 Jul 2016, at 10:14, Eric Wong wrote:
> larsxschnei...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Please note that the protocol filters do not support stream processing
>> with this implemenatation because the filter needs to know the length of
>> the result in advance. A protocol version 2 could address this in
On 23 Jul 2016, at 02:11, Jakub Narębski wrote:
> W dniu 2016-07-22 o 17:49, larsxschnei...@gmail.com pisze:
>> From: Lars Schneider
>
> Nb. this line is only needed if you want author name and/or date
> different from the email sender, or if you have sender line misconfigured
> (e.g. lacking
On 23 Jul 2016, at 01:19, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> On 22/07/16 16:49, larsxschnei...@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Lars Schneider
>>
>> Git's clean/smudge mechanism invokes an external filter process for every
>> single blob that is affected by a filter. If Git filters a lot of blobs
>> then the star
On 23 Jul 2016, at 00:32, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
> On 07/22/2016 05:49 PM, larsxschnei...@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Lars Schneider
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> 1. Git starts the filter on first usage and expects a welcome message
>> with protocol version number:
>> Git <-- Filter: "git-filter-
larsxschnei...@gmail.com wrote:
> Please note that the protocol filters do not support stream processing
> with this implemenatation because the filter needs to know the length of
> the result in advance. A protocol version 2 could address this in a
> future patch.
Would it be prudent to reuse pkt
Jakub Narębski wrote:
> W dniu 2016-07-22 o 17:49, larsxschnei...@gmail.com pisze:
> > +use strict;
> > +use warnings;
> > +use autodie;
>
> autodie?
"set -e" for Perl (man autodie)
It's been a part of Perl for ages, but I've never used it
myself, either; I suppose it's fine for tests...
> > +
W dniu 2016-07-22 o 17:49, larsxschnei...@gmail.com pisze:
> From: Lars Schneider
Nb. this line is only needed if you want author name and/or date
different from the email sender, or if you have sender line misconfigured
(e.g. lacking the human readable name).
>
> Git's clean/smudge mechanism i
Hi Lars,
On 23/07/16 00:19, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>
>
> On 22/07/16 16:49, larsxschnei...@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Lars Schneider
>>
>> Git's clean/smudge mechanism invokes an external filter process for every
>> single blob that is affected by a filter. If Git filters a lot of blobs
>> then th
On 22/07/16 16:49, larsxschnei...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Lars Schneider
>
> Git's clean/smudge mechanism invokes an external filter process for every
> single blob that is affected by a filter. If Git filters a lot of blobs
> then the startup time of the external filter processes can become a
On 07/22/2016 05:49 PM, larsxschnei...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Lars Schneider
Git's clean/smudge mechanism invokes an external filter process for every
single blob that is affected by a filter. If Git filters a lot of blobs
then the startup time of the external filter processes can become a
si
From: Lars Schneider
Git's clean/smudge mechanism invokes an external filter process for every
single blob that is affected by a filter. If Git filters a lot of blobs
then the startup time of the external filter processes can become a
significant part of the overall Git execution time.
This patc
25 matches
Mail list logo
