Hi Stefan,
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 11:54 AM Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 13 Aug 2018, Stefan Beller wrote:
> >
> > > > > The later lines that indicate a change to the Makefile will be
> > > > > treated as context both in the outer and i
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 11:54 AM Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
>
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018, Stefan Beller wrote:
>
> > > > The later lines that indicate a change to the Makefile will be treated
> > > > as
> > > > context both in the outer and inner diff, such that those lines stay
> > > >
Hi Stefan,
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018, Stefan Beller wrote:
> > > The later lines that indicate a change to the Makefile will be treated as
> > > context both in the outer and inner diff, such that those lines stay
> > > regular color.
> >
> > While I am a fan of having those lines colored correctly, I
> > The later lines that indicate a change to the Makefile will be treated as
> > context both in the outer and inner diff, such that those lines stay
> > regular color.
>
> While I am a fan of having those lines colored correctly, I have to admit
> that I am not exactly enthusiastic about that ext
Hi Stefan,
On Fri, 10 Aug 2018, Stefan Beller wrote:
> The range-diff coloring is a bit fuzzy when it comes to special lines of
> a diff, such as indicating new and old files with +++ and ---, as it
> would pickup the first character and interpret it for its coloring, which
> seems annoying as in
The range-diff coloring is a bit fuzzy when it comes to special lines of
a diff, such as indicating new and old files with +++ and ---, as it
would pickup the first character and interpret it for its coloring, which
seems annoying as in regular diffs, these lines are colored bold via
DIFF_METAINFO.
6 matches
Mail list logo