Johannes Schindelin writes:
> Maybe something like instead?
>
> static int one_of(const char *term, ...)
> {
> int res = 0;
> va_list matches;
> const char *match;
>
> va_start(matches, term);
> while (!res && (matc
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 11:19 PM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Pranit Bauva wrote:
>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Eric Sunshine
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:36 AM, Pranit Bauva wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Eric Sunshine
wrote:
>
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Pranit Bauva wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:36 AM, Pranit Bauva wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Eric Sunshine
>>> wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:07 AM, Pranit Bauva
wrote:
>
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> Maybe something like instead?
>
> static int one_of(const char *term, ...)
> {
> int res = 0;
> va_list matches;
> const char *match;
>
> va_start(matches, t
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> Hi Pranit,
>
> On Wed, 4 May 2016, Pranit Bauva wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Eric Sunshine
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:07 AM, Pranit Bauva
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> +static int one_of(const char *term, ...)
>
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:36 AM, Pranit Bauva wrote:
>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Eric Sunshine
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:07 AM, Pranit Bauva wrote:
>>> Okay, I'll bite: Why is this a good idea? What does it buy you?
>>>
Hi Pranit,
On Wed, 4 May 2016, Pranit Bauva wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Eric Sunshine
> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:07 AM, Pranit Bauva wrote:
> >
> >> +static int one_of(const char *term, ...)
> >> +{
> >> + va_list matches;
> >> + const char *match;
> >> +
>
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:36 AM, Pranit Bauva wrote:
>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Eric Sunshine
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:07 AM, Pranit Bauva wrote:
>>> Okay, I'll bite: Why is this a good idea? What does it buy you?
>>
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:36 AM, Pranit Bauva wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Eric Sunshine
> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:07 AM, Pranit Bauva wrote:
>> Okay, I'll bite: Why is this a good idea? What does it buy you?
>>
>> It's not as if the rewrite is especially faster or more e
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Pranit Bauva wrote:
>
> [1]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/293489
>
> [2]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/293489
>
> [3]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/293489
These are incorrect links.
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:07 AM, Pranit Bauva wrote:
>> This reimplements the `check_term_format` shell function in C and adds
>
> s/This reimplements/Reimplement/
> s/adds/add/
>
>> a `--check-term-format` subcommand to `git bisect--helper`
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:07 AM, Pranit Bauva wrote:
> This reimplements the `check_term_format` shell function in C and adds
s/This reimplements/Reimplement/
s/adds/add/
> a `--check-term-format` subcommand to `git bisect--helper` to call it
> from git-bisect.sh
s/$/./
Okay, I'll bite: Why is
This reimplements the `check_term_format` shell function in C and adds
a `--check-term-format` subcommand to `git bisect--helper` to call it
from git-bisect.sh
Helped-by: Johannes Schindelein
Mentored-by: Lars Schneider
Mentored-by: Christian Couder
Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva
---
builtin/bis
13 matches
Mail list logo
