Hi Pranit,
On Wed, 4 May 2016, Pranit Bauva wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Eric Sunshine <sunsh...@sunshineco.com>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:07 AM, Pranit Bauva <pranit.ba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> +static int one_of(const char *term, ...)
> >> +{
> >> + va_list matches;
> >> + const char *match;
> >> +
> >> + va_start(matches, term);
> >> + while ((match = va_arg(matches, const char *)) != NULL)
> >> + if (!strcmp(term, match))
> >> + return 1;
> >
> > Is it wise to return here without invoking va_end()?
>
> I guess since it already checks for NULL, invoking va_end() will make
> it redundant[3].
Actually, this is my fault (I suggested that form of the one_of()
function). The man page for va_end() clearly states that every call to
va_start() needs to be paired with a corresponding va_end(), so it is
incorrect to return without a call to va_end().
Maybe something like instead?
static int one_of(const char *term, ...)
{
int res = 0;
va_list matches;
const char *match;
va_start(matches, term);
while (!res && (match = va_arg(matches, const char *)))
res = !strcmp(term, match);
va_end(matches);
return res;
}
Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
