ly in 64b Ubuntu, it wasn't happening in 32b.
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Justin Collum wrote:
>> That doesn't make sense. If you are the owner of the file, why do you need
>> sudo???
>
> I've just never seen a chmod command without sudo. I assumed it was
> That doesn't make sense. If you are the owner of the file, why do you need
> sudo???
I've just never seen a chmod command without sudo. I assumed it was
needed. Is this relevant to the bug that I'm seeing?
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 5:40 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
&g
08, 2013 at 11:35:35PM +0200, Stefan Beller wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/08/2013 10:27 PM, Justin Collum wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>> -rwxrwxrwx 1 dev dev 17K Aug 8 13:12 index
>>>> [...]
>>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 dev dev 17K Aug
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Andrew Ruder wrote:
> he is neither the user dev or the group dev
I am both. There's only one user on this machine and he is me.
> he is regularly running chmod -R 777
Yes, true. I have a program that I use to edit some of these files
(not the git files) that li
I've run into a strange situation with git lately. It seems that
anything I do involving git will alter the permissions on my index
file to the point that I can't do anything until I re-add the
permissions on the file.
Looks like a bug to me, is it? It does seem like this has started
happening sin
5 matches
Mail list logo