On 20 July 2017 at 02:54, Tillson Galloway wrote:
> Context:
> We currently have a git project with a root directory ("~/project")
> for pipelines and deployment of a Node app, and then a subdirectory
> ("~/project/project-app").
> After realizing that we didn't need the node app in a subdirectory
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 17:36:39 -0700
Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Jonathan Tan
> wrote:
> > The "used" field in struct object is only used by builtin/fsck. Remove
> > that field and modify builtin/fsck to use a flag instead.
>
> The patch looks good to me (I would even
Context:
We currently have a git project with a root directory ("~/project")
for pipelines and deployment of a Node app, and then a subdirectory
("~/project/project-app").
After realizing that we didn't need the node app in a subdirectory, we
moved the full app into the root directory (using the mv
2017-07-19 13:44 GMT+08:00 Jordi Mas :
> El 15/07/2017 a les 07:06, Jiang Xin ha escrit:
>>
>
> Hello Jiang,
>
> Sometimes I do several commits to complete the translation. However, github
> from the UI does not offer me the option to Merge and Squash.
>
> Can you check that you have "Allow squash
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> The "used" field in struct object is only used by builtin/fsck. Remove
> that field and modify builtin/fsck to use a flag instead.
The patch looks good to me (I would even claim this could
go in as an independent cleanup, not tied to the RFCi
In a subsequent patch, sha1_file will need to append object names in the
form of "unsigned char *" to oid arrays. Teach sha1-array support for
that.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan
---
sha1-array.c | 7 +++
sha1-array.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/sha1-array.c b/sha1-ar
Teach sha1_file to invoke a hook whenever an object is requested and
unavailable but is promised. The hook is a shell command that can be
configured through "git config"; this hook takes in a list of hashes and
writes (if successful) the corresponding objects to the repo's local
storage.
The usage
Currently, Git does not support repos with very large numbers of objects
or repos that wish to minimize manipulation of certain blobs (for
example, because they are very large) very well, even if the user
operates mostly on part of the repo, because Git is designed on the
assumption that every refe
The "used" field in struct object is only used by builtin/fsck. Remove
that field and modify builtin/fsck to use a flag instead.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan
---
builtin/fsck.c | 24 ++--
object.c | 1 -
object.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 dele
Thanks for all your comments on the earlier version. This is a
substantially different version. In particular:
- Now supports all types (tag, commit, tree) of objects, not only blobs
- fsck works
- Incorporates Ben Peart's code that uses a long-living process
(lifetime of the Git invocation)
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 15:06:11 -0700
> Stefan Beller wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Jonathan Tan
>> wrote:
>> > In a subsequent patch, sha1_file will need to append object names in the
>> > form of "unsigned char *" to oid arra
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 15:06:11 -0700
Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Jonathan Tan
> wrote:
> > In a subsequent patch, sha1_file will need to append object names in the
> > form of "unsigned char *" to oid arrays. Teach sha1-array support for
> > that.
> >
> > Signed-off-b
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 15:02:09 -0700
Stefan Beller wrote:
> Here I wondered what this file looks like, in a later patch you
> add documentation:
>
> +objects/promisedblob::
> + This file records the sha1 object names and sizes of promised
> + blobs.
> +
>
> but that leaves mor
Hi,
Jonathan Tan wrote:
> If obj->type == OBJ_TREE, an invocation of fsck_walk() will invoke
> parse_tree() and return quickly if that returns nonzero, so it is of no
> use for traverse_one_object() to invoke parse_tree() in this situation
> before invoking fsck_walk(). Remove that code.
I like
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> But there may be hope. Since the character sequence "PRItime" is highly
> unlikely to occur in Git's source code in any context other than the
> format to print/parse timestamp_t, it should be possible to automate a the
> string replacement
>
> git ls-files -z
Johannes Schindelin writes:
>> Gettext handles macros such as PRIuMAX in commit 8b45c5df1 ("Add
>> support for ISO C 99 format string directive macros.",
>> 2002-07-23 12:33:13 +).
>
> Wow. This is ugly.
>
> If I understand correctly, then this will not even work correctly for
> PRIuMAX on W
On 07/19, Stefan Beller wrote:
> This is another test balloon to see if we get complaints from people
> whose compilers do not support variables scoped to for loops.
>
> This part of the code base was chosen as it is very old code that does
> not change often, such that a potential revert is easy.
This is another test balloon to see if we get complaints from people
whose compilers do not support variables scoped to for loops.
This part of the code base was chosen as it is very old code that does
not change often, such that a potential revert is easy.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller
---
This
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 7:27 AM, Robert Dailey wrote:
> So I found out about "subrepo" today:
> https://github.com/ingydotnet/git-subrepo
>
> I'm still reading about how it works internally, but what do you guys
> think about it?
Nice find!
>From reading the toplevel ReadMe.pod, I have the impr
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> By declaring the task_cb parameter of type `void **`, the signature of
> the get_next_task method suggests that the "task-specific cookie" can be
> defined in that method, and the signatures of the start_failure and of
> the task_finish
In sha1_loose_object_info(), use access() (indirectly invoked through
has_loose_object()) instead of lstat() if we do not need the on-disk
size, as it should be faster on Windows [1].
[1]
https://public-inbox.org/git/alpine.DEB.2.21.1.1707191450570.4193@virtualbox/
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan
-
Hello,
I have a .gitconfig in which I try to separate work and private stuff
by using includes which works great.
When using [include] the path is treated either
- relative to the including file (if the path itself relative)
- relative to the home directory if it starts with ~
- absolute if the p
Hello again,
In git/Makefile, we can see that `$(MAKE) PROFILE=GEN -j1 perf` is
being skipped for the `profile` target when there is no
`$GIT_PERF_REPO`:
https://github.com/git/git/blob/cac25fc330fc26050dcbc92c4bfff169a4848e93/Makefile#L1769-L1782
However, the same is not true for the `profile
By declaring the task_cb parameter of type `void **`, the signature of
the get_next_task method suggests that the "task-specific cookie" can be
defined in that method, and the signatures of the start_failure and of
the task_finished methods declare that parameter of type `void *`,
suggesting that t
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:49 PM, Prathamesh Chavan wrote:
> +static void print_submodule_summary(struct summary_cb *info,
> + struct module_cb *p)
> +{
> + int missing_src = 0;
> + int missing_dst = 0;
> + char *displaypath;
> + char *s
So I found out about "subrepo" today: https://github.com/ingydotnet/git-subrepo
I'm still reading about how it works internally, but what do you guys
think about it? Is it a more or less perfect alternative to
submodules? What would be a reason not to use it?
On Tue, Jul 18 2017, Shawn Pearce jotted:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Shawn Pearce writes:
>>> where `time_sec` is the update time in seconds since the epoch. The
>>> `reverse_int32` function inverses the value so lexographical ordering
>>> the network byte ord
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:49 PM, Prathamesh Chavan wrote:
> +static void deinit_submodule(const struct cache_entry *list_item,
> +void *cb_data)
> +{
> + struct deinit_cb *info = cb_data;
> + const struct submodule *sub;
> + char *displaypath = NULL;
Hi Jian (or is it Xin?),
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Jiang Xin wrote:
> 2017-07-19 1:35 GMT+08:00 Junio C Hamano :
> > Jiang Xin writes:
> >
> >>> Two potential issues are:
> >>>
> >>> - After this patch, there still are quite a many
> >>>
> >>> printf("time is %"PRItime" ...\n", timestamp)
>
Hi Jonathan,
On Tue, 18 Jul 2017, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 12:30:46 +0200
> Christian Couder wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Jonathan Tan
> > wrote:
> >
> > > diff --git a/sha1_file.c b/sha1_file.c
> > > index bf6b64ec8..778f01d92 100644
> > > --- a/sha1_file.c
Hi everyone,
The 29th edition of Git Rev News is now published:
https://git.github.io/rev_news/2017/07/19/edition-29/
Thanks a lot to all the contributors and helpers!
Enjoy,
Christian, Thomas, Jakub and Markus.
Hello,
I'm trying to build a profile-optimized Git. I used to do this with
the following commands:
mkdir /tmp/git
cd /tmp/git
curl https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/git-2.13.3.tar.xz | tar xJ
cd git-2.13.3
make prefix=/usr profile man -j18
sudo make prefix=/usr P
32 matches
Mail list logo
