On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Bob Meetin wrote:
> Subject says it all. I have a large assortment of product pictures
> which I need to give uniform backgrounds, preferably white. Can someone
> point me to a tutorial that discusses how? You can see a representative
> sample image at: http://w
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> On 09/30/2009 11:04 PM, TREY Mcatt wrote:
> > I would like to stop receiveing the gimp e-mail's. Thanks
>
> Then why don't you unsubscribe? Link can be found at the
> bottom of the mails
>
And in the headers of every message, and in the
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Greg Chapman wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On 30 Sep 09 22:10 Martin Nordholts said:
>>
>> Then why don't you unsubscribe? Link can be found at the
>> bottom of the mails
>
> Maybe because TREY does not see the link. When I opened TREY's mail
> there was no footer visib
Try to send mail to:
gimp-user-requ...@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
with the subject: unsubscribe
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:51 AM, dudu...@juno.com wrote:
>
> GET ME OFF THIS GODDAM FI CK LING MAILING LIST IT IS THE 20th attempt I am
> making on every damn e-mail available. I will soon start writing
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 5:16 PM, bob wrote:
> Hi guys.
>
> I often get bands when I create gradients.
>
> I'd like to know how this happends and how I can reduce or get rid of these
> artifacts entirely.
Are you sure it's not your monitor? I have a Dell LCD monitor that has
this problem really ba
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 1:07 PM, GSR - FR wrote:
> Hi,
> gra...@yadtel.net (2009-11-12 at 1329.34 -0500):
>> recomendation??
>>
>> I've been looking online at ViewSonic X Series VX2433wm Black 23.6" 2ms(GTG);
>> 5ms HDMI Full 1080P Widescreen LCD Monitor -
>> Maximum Resolution: 1920 x 1080
>
> If
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Volker Lenhardt
wrote:
> Paul Hartman schrieb:
>>
>> On the other hand I have had great experience with Dell Ultrasharp
>> series, which usually have IPS or PVA panels, I think. I would
>> recommend them as a combination of pri
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> People,
>
> I am trying to work out why there is such a large file increase when I
> edit a file and save it. The background info:
Google the difference between "lossy" and "lossless" image
compression. Once you understand the fundamental
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> - there was a loss of information when the first JPG was saved in the
> digital camera memory from the CCD
Correct
> - when the JPG is uncompressed by GIMP into RAM, there is no loss of
> information (?)
Since JPG is not lossless, there
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 5:54 PM, David Hodson wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 13:32 -0600, Paul Hartman wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
>
>> > - when the JPG is uncompressed by GIMP into RAM, there is no loss of
>> > informat
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:30 PM, wrote:
>
> I installed Gimp for the first time this week. Subsequently, Secunia PSI
> alerted me that the version of GTK + (2.16.6) installed with Gimp is
> insecure. The GTK web site identifies the current version as 2.18.
Same problem happens with other progr
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 8:41 AM, BGP wrote:
> I'm sure you folks are all experts at GIMP but I've found it to be a
> very hard to learn how to use. But how many hundreds of hours did it
> take you to learn how to use it?
It depends what you mean by "learn how to use it". GIMP is just a
tool, wha
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:57 AM, wrote:
> Is there a typical or standard monitor resolution a web site should be
> designed for?
>
> The problem I'm having is that when I make a web page the pictures are
> in a different position as viewed from various computers.
>
> Any ideas?
There is no stand
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 5:06 PM, wrote:
> The only problem isI have no idea how to set the width of my web page.
> I need to know the exact html code I'm supposed to use.
Perhaps use the width or max-width CSS properties in the appropriate
place on your page. Which one you use might depend
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Nathan Lane wrote:
> W3C does only go over the very basics of everything they offer. Which may
> make it silly.
You mean w3schools? :) The names are confusing...
Anyway when I need a HTML or CSS reference I go straight to the source:
http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/RE
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Deniz Dogan wrote:
> 2010/1/29 Paul Hartman :
>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Nathan Lane wrote:
>>> W3C does only go over the very basics of everything they offer. Which may
>>> make it silly.
>>
>> You mea
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Jim Clark wrote:
> Which I did...after clicking and cropping for about an hour! And now it
> works as it always has. Not sure how I changed anything, but I surely did.
> And now it is changed back.
The best way to figure something out yourself is to publicly ask
17 matches
Mail list logo
