Jay Smith wrote:
> What am I missing?
>
Maybe a step by step. I've just tried it again and it works with a
minimum of mousing (I'm using gimp 2.6.4).
1. Add alpha channel to initial layer.
2. Add new black layer and move it underneath. (After this step make
sure you change the active layer to
Can any experienced Gimp users tell me how the process described in Ron
Bigelow's article can be reproduced in Gimp most efficiently?
http://www.ronbigelow.com/articles/contrast/contrast.htm
http://www.ronbigelow.com/articles/contrast/contrast.htm
Looks like a quite handy process to optimise so
How about something like :
duplicate layer
desaturate
invert
slight blur
adjust opacity
merge
HTH
-
The information in this e-mail and any attachments is
confidential and is intended for the attention and
>>I always do them in Photoshop on my windows laptop.
>>
>>Am I the only one with this problem?/ I have a bet going that I'm
>>not ;^). I say linux is weak in the printing area & it's about the only
>>good thing windows does.
>>
>
>Hmm, if I had photoshop I wouldn't be using gimp!
>
>I've got w
Hello,
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Andrew wrote:
> Jay Smith wrote:
>> What am I missing?
>>
> Maybe a step by step. I've just tried it again and it works with a
> minimum of mousing (I'm using gimp 2.6.4).
>
> 1. Add alpha channel to initial layer.
> 2. Add new black layer and move it undern
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:32 PM, paperaussie wrote:
>
> Can any experienced Gimp users tell me how the process described in Ron
> Bigelow's article can be reproduced in Gimp most efficiently?
>
> http://www.ronbigelow.com/articles/contrast/contrast.htm
> http://www.ronbigelow.com/articles/contrast/
Francesco Scaglioni wrote:
> How about something like :
>
> duplicate layer
> desaturate
> invert
> slight blur
> adjust opacity
> merge
Placing the top layer in divide mode is also very useful. Also try
Overlay or Soft light. All this is much simpler than the method
suggested by the original
Quoting paperaussie :
>
> Can any experienced Gimp users tell me how the process described in Ron
> Bigelow's article can be reproduced in Gimp most efficiently?
>
> http://www.ronbigelow.com/articles/contrast/contrast.htm
The following link is to a short screen capture of how that might be
don
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Olivier Lecarme
> Placing the top layer in divide mode is also very useful. Also try
> Overlay or Soft light. All this is much simpler than the method
> suggested by the original site, which seems an overkill.
Agreed. If I was doing this, I would not use channels a
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:39:17AM +0200, Carusoswi wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 06:46:59PM -0400, Gracia M. Littauer wrote:
> >> I always do them in Photoshop on my windows laptop.
> >>
> >> Am I the only one with this problem?/ I have a bet going that I'm
> >> not ;^). I say linux is weak
Using Gimp 2.6.6 on Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy) Linux.
For the vast majority of my work, every time I enlarge the canvas (which
I have to do a _lot_ ), I want _all_ the Layers to enlarge as well.
However, the dialog box
Image... Canvas Size... Layers...
_always_ seems to default to "None" instead of
Hi David,
If convenient, please advise me of the bug number on this so that I can
track it. Thank you very much.
Related to the "bug", I hope you also noted the problem that there is no
Preferences option of using "black" as the default for newly created images.
You said...
> BTW, floating befo
Quoting Jay Smith :
> Using Gimp 2.6.6 on Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy) Linux.
>
> For the vast majority of my work, every time I enlarge the canvas (which
> I have to do a _lot_ ), I want _all_ the Layers to enlarge as well.
>
> However, the dialog box
>
>Image... Canvas Size... Layers...
>
> _always_
Hi saulgoode,
Thanks for your input, but I am afraid that you have completely
misunderstood the intent of my question.
- I want the visible "objects" (other than the background color)
currently in the image to remain exactly the same size.
- I want to increase the size of the canvas and fill the
I have just discovered an additional -- but exactly the same basic
subject -- problem with this dialog box:
The 'link' symbol at the top, between the two pixel sizes, reverts every
single time to "linked" status. It seems that it has to be "unlinked"
every time if you wish to change only one of t
On Wednesday 01 April 2009, Marco Ciampa wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:39:17AM +0200, Carusoswi wrote:
>> >On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 06:46:59PM -0400, Gracia M. Littauer wrote:
>> >> I always do them in Photo shop on my windows laptop.
>> >>
>> >> Am I the only one with this problem?/ I have a b
Using Gimp 2.6.6 on Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy) Linux.
TIFF ONLY This problem seems *only* to be happening when
creating/saving TIFF (.tif) files. If the filetype is something else,
then the problem is not happening.
On two different workstations, being run by two different login users,
creating fi
Hi Jay,
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Jay Smith wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> If convenient, please advise me of the bug number on this so that I can
> track it. Thank you very much.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=577575
>
> Related to the "bug", I hope you also noted the problem that t
Saul:
You said
1. Drag your original layer over to the Channels Dialog and drop it,
creating a new channel.
In your video, when you drag the image from the layer dock up to the
channels dock your cursor has a '+' sign inside the
_
|+ ... when I do it I have no plus sign and when the channels d
I mentioned some time ago that I was reading The Artist's Guide to GIMP
Effects, by michael j. hammel, and that over time I'd report on what I
thought about it. Ok, here's what I think about it--WOW!
I still have a long way to go to absorb everything in here, but in a few
weeks I've gone from
Quoting Alec Burgess :
> Saul:
> You said
>> 1. Drag your original layer over to the Channels Dialog and drop
>> it, creating a new channel.
> In your video, when you drag the image from the layer dock up to the
> channels dock your cursor has a '+' sign inside the
> _
> |+ ... when I do it I
Thanks Saul. (Leaving text below in case this s/b the basis for a
bugreport ...)
a) I can drag and drop in the Layers dialog - but never see the '+'-sign
in the cursor.
b) In your video (I stepped through it frame by frame so I'm pretty sure
I have this correct) as soon as you grabbed the layer
22 matches
Mail list logo
