Anthony Ettinger wrote:
> On 1/22/07, Anthony Ettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 1/22/07, Scott Bicknell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Monday 22 January 2007 4:46 am, Anthony Ettinger wrote:
>>>
I've been through this before, I usually just change the bg of
the image to the one
ok___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
/ Alexander Rabtchevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| 3. refocus (do not mix with refocus-it) plugin to add natural sharpness
| to images (it uses other technique than sharpening).
Hmm. The 0.9.0 release seems to be from 2003 and doesn't compile with
GIMP 2.2.13. Is there a more recent
On 1/23/07, Olivier Ripoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anthony Ettinger wrote:
> > On 1/22/07, Anthony Ettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 1/22/07, Scott Bicknell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> On Monday 22 January 2007 4:46 am, Anthony Ettinger wrote:
> >>>
> I've been through this
I am trying to create some backgrounds for webpagesand they must have that
"flattened" look. That's the only way I can describe it. They look like the
contrast has been reduced and the page brightened overall. Considering all the
tools available in GIMP, one of them must be the one , but I
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:37:37 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am trying to create some backgrounds for webpagesand they must
> have that "flattened" look. That's the only way I can describe
> it. They look like the contrast has been reduced and the page
> brightened overall. Considering all
On 1/23/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am trying to create some backgrounds for webpagesand they must have
> that "flattened" look. That's the only way I can describe it. They look like
> the contrast has been reduced and the page brightened overall. Considering
> all
Thanks, but I've done it every which way from hell and back, and still
looks off in FF/linux.
--
Anthony Ettinger
Ph: 408-656-2473
http://chovy.dyndns.org/resume.html
http://utuxia.com/consulting
Your test case webpage at
http://chovy.dyndns.org/gimp/test/green.htmllooks fine to me. I'm
usi
As he has repeatedly stated, the problem is under FF/Linux. There are many
things in which FF/Win FF/Max and FF/Linux are different. It looks like
FF/Linux isn't up to date with Gamma correction for some reason
Jeff
--
---
On Tuesday 23 January 2007 12:10 pm, Jeffrey Brent McBeth wrote:
> As he has repeatedly stated, the problem is under FF/Linux.
> There are many things in which FF/Win FF/Max and FF/Linux are
> different. It looks like FF/Linux isn't up to date with Gamma
> correction for some reason
Still, it s
FF1.5.0.9 running under FC5: no visible difference.
Your problem is NOT a FF/Linux issue.
Bill Lee
Scott Bicknell wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 January 2007 12:10 pm, Jeffrey Brent McBeth wrote:
>
>> As he has repeatedly stated, the problem is under FF/Linux.
>> There are many things in which FF/Win
> Thanks, but I've done it every which way from hell and back, and still
> looks off in FF/linux.
Looked AOK to me this morning - the link doesn't seem to be coming up now.
I'm running FF 1.5.0.9 on Fedora 6.
Chris
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@
Actually - since the file and web page itself is OK,
for some (... some people can see it correctly)
then using simple logic, the problem isn't to do with
The GIMP ...
If there is something wrong with the file then no one
should be able to see it correctly ... unless the
display process is correct
* A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-23-07 20:31]:
[...]
> and thus it most likely IS a FF or Linux issue.
>
> i.e. the people not seeing it correctly must have
>
> either: a) a setting "issue" in FF or Linux (display)
>
> or: b) using a version of FF or Linux (display driver)
>with that "issue"
On 1/23/07, Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-23-07 20:31]:
> [...]
> > and thus it most likely IS a FF or Linux issue.
> >
> > i.e. the people not seeing it correctly must have
> >
> > either: a) a setting "issue" in FF or Linux (display)
> >
> > or: b) usi
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:52:42 +0100
Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:37:37 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I am trying to create some backgrounds for webpagesand they must
> > have that "flattened" look. That's the only way I can describe
> > it. They look
On Tuesday 23 January 2007 23:47, Anthony Ettinger wrote:
> On 1/23/07, Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-23-07 20:31]:
> > [...]
> >
> > > and thus it most likely IS a FF or Linux issue.
> > >
> > > i.e. the people not seeing it correctly must have
> > >
I found this message in the archive, and joined the list. I have the same
problem exactly: my tablet works, but the mouse is ignored when it's on the
canvas area (only).
I found a workaround: In Preferences-->Input Devices, reset settings to
defaults. Restart GIMP like it tells you to. Then, in
18 matches
Mail list logo
