Barry Loo wrote:
> GIMP just got some negative press at linux.com. What are y'alls opinions on
> it?
It reads as negative press regarding the GIMP UI redesign process and web site
rather than negative press regarding GIMP.
--
Cheers!
Kevin.
http://www.ve3syb.ca/ |"What are we goin
That's great, thanks.
Bought the book, by the way. Very useful even though I've been using Gimp
for quite a long time now.
Thomas
On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 18:00:18 -, Akkana Peck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Thomas Worthington writes:
>> > Is there any way to get the print dialog in 2.4 to w
Duh! I'm on Linux (Gentoo) with Gimp 2.4.1 installed. Should have said; I
keep forgetting there's other platforms out there!
On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 13:27:38 -, norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Is there any way to get the print dialog in 2.4 to work like the old
>> Gimp-Print one? The new o
On Tuesday 23 October 2007 03:21:00 pm Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 13:43 -0400, John Culleton wrote:
> > Understood. But isn't there a recent feature that allows one to preview
> > in the restricted gamut of cmyk? I forget what it is called.
>
> You could do a Soft Proof in
Thomas Worthington writes:
> > Is there any way to get the print dialog in 2.4 to work like the old
> > Gimp-Print one? The new one is hopeless: doesn't list my printers (which
norman writes:
> that I haven't yet got Gimp 2.4.1 installed as there is nothing yet for
> non-techies using Ubuntu.
> Is there any way to get the print dialog in 2.4 to work like the old
> Gimp-Print one? The new one is hopeless: doesn't list my printers (which
> the old one didn't either but at least I could tell it about them), won't
> take a .ppd file to set printable area or indeed any other feature o
Is there any way to get the print dialog in 2.4 to work like the old
Gimp-Print one? The new one is hopeless: doesn't list my printers (which
the old one didn't either but at least I could tell it about them), won't
take a .ppd file to set printable area or indeed any other feature of the
p
if you are trying to do image and high tech work and find it a tax
deductible expense of your work, then I fail to see how the larger scheme of
world poverty is at issue. if you are on this list, you already own a
computer and are already on dialup at the very least so you are not part of
the worl
On Saturday 03 November 2007 22:31:44 carol irvin wrote:
> how many people here are on dialup?
Me. Mostly due to lack of alternatives.
If either the Government or an ISP or both gets an act, we can
eventually get a 512kb satellite connection for about AUD$45
a month. Plus ghasp dollars per gigaby
how many people here are on dialup? for anyone still debating the switch in
the usa, i have found that it paid for itself. i have not owned a land line
in years. i own an iphone. period. i am on the cheapest plan with that
since I use email to stay in contact with over 95% of the people I know
10 matches
Mail list logo
