On Wednesday 03 October 2007 04:35:36 David Southwell wrote:
> IMHO photoshop is NOT a tool designed for the "average user".
"Average" can mean "typical" & it can mean numbers (as in
mean/mode/median), either way, PS fits the bill.
So if you want to struggle with an "average" creativity ceiling
&
On 3 Oct 2007 01:23:24 -, mike reqavey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> greetings
> please point me in the direction of how I could make a captcha around 8.5 x
> 11.0 inches. It'd be a one shot deal for a poster, not something generated
> randomly on a website.
> I was thinking using lay
On 3 Oct 2007 01:23:24 -, mike reqavey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> greetings
> please point me in the direction of how I could make a captcha around 8.5x
> 11.0 inches.
>
Closest I could come up with was the Filters->Animation->Rippling
--
Tim Jedlicka, Network Entomologist
[EMAIL PROTECTE
greetings
please point me in the direction of how I could make a captcha around 8.5 x
11.0 inches. It'd be a one shot deal for a poster, not something generated
randomly on a website.
I was thinking using layered letters and rotating each letter, but any
suggestion would be helpful.
thanks
re
Hi David,
> Message: 7
> Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 11:35:36 -0700
> From: David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Bit-depth Processing
>
> IMHO photoshop is NOT a tool designed for the "average user".
I would like to, respectfully, disagree. Photoshop IS meant for an
"average u
> Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 12:38:38 -0400
> From: "carol irvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Bit-depth Processing
>
> ... The instructors don't
> care about
> anything but the artistic merit of the results. If I were the student, I'd
Patrick Shanahan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> * gimp_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-02-07 13:47]:
> Much unnecessary quote removed.
> > One thing I forgot to mention is that if you are simply trying to
> > edit an image for your own use and can revisit the original then the
> > absense of non-de
no, my habit on this type of thing is to separately save the two versions
(to desktop while working; to be moved when done). I then pick one of the
images with Select>All and Edit>Copy. I then go to the other image and hit
Edit>Paste. I now have 2 layers which show up in the layers palette, one
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 11:58:47AM -0700, Greg wrote:
> --- Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Then you need to abandon the jpeg format as it is lossey (google for
> > it) and you need to shoot RAW.
>
> I know, but if you can retain your original bit-depth, the lossyness
> isn't as no
--- Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then you need to abandon the jpeg format as it is lossey (google for
> it) and you need to shoot RAW.
I know, but if you can retain your original bit-depth, the lossyness
isn't as noticeable, especially if you set the compression to the
lowest poss
* gimp_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-02-07 13:47]:
Much unnecessary quote removed.
> One thing I forgot to mention is that if you are simply trying to edit an
> image for your own use and can revisit the original then the absense of
> non-destrucitve editing features may not be a handicap. Th
--- carol irvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i opened gimp and just used the default black brush and made a bunch
> of black squiggles on a white canvas. then i altered that version
> with a filter. and, drum roll please, made them into two layers!
I did this in 2.2.17 and I didn't get another
David Southwell wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 October 2007 10:05:51 Sven Neumann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> while your explanation of non-destructive editing is all fine, I still
>> think that your postings to this list are nothing but noise. This list
>> is about using GIMP. The users who are interested in deve
On Tuesday 02 October 2007 10:50:44 Elwin Estle wrote:
> I am hardly an expert on this whole issue. I would like to see a side by
> side comparison of prints made from 8 bit vs 16 bit images to see just
> exactly what the difference might be. I think your average person probably
> wouldn't care.
I am hardly an expert on this whole issue. I would like to see a side by side
comparison
of prints made from 8 bit vs 16 bit images to see just exactly what the
difference might
be. I think your average person probably wouldn't care. It has been mentioned
that
monitors are poor venues on whic
On Tuesday 02 October 2007 10:05:51 Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while your explanation of non-destructive editing is all fine, I still
> think that your postings to this list are nothing but noise. This list
> is about using GIMP. The users who are interested in development know
> very well that
On Tuesday 02 October 2007 10:07:56 gimp_user wrote:
> On Thursday 27 September 2007 08:00:45 George Farris wrote:
> > Though you object to selective discussion of your discorse, you have
> > at least twice falsely referred to gimp's lack of a tool for "non-
> > distructive editing". The term is a
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 18:32:02 +0200 Frank Lanitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I've got a small problem with creating splash screens for grub with
> my GIMP. I need to create a file *.xpm.gz with this things:
>
> Basic instructions:
> * xpm file format
> * 640x480
> * 14 colors only
>
> and
Hi,
while your explanation of non-destructive editing is all fine, I still
think that your postings to this list are nothing but noise. This list
is about using GIMP. The users who are interested in development know
very well that everything you asked for is already on our roadmap. You
can even ge
> On 10/2/07, gimp_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday 01 October 2007 16:09:23 jim feldman wrote:
> > > Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > > > * Greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-01-07 13:29]
> > > >
> > > >> In any event, from what you've told me, GIMP may not be the right
> >
> > tool
> >
> > > >
Hi,
I've got a small problem with creating splash screens for grub with
my GIMP. I need to create a file *.xpm.gz with this things:
Basic instructions:
* xpm file format
* 640x480
* 14 colors only
and I have no idea, how to mange it. Any hints? ;)
Frank
P.S. I'm using 2.4rc1.
pg
On Thursday 27 September 2007 08:00:45 George Farris wrote:
> Though you object to selective discussion of your discorse, you have
> at least twice falsely referred to gimp's lack of a tool for "non-
> distructive editing". The term is a contradiction in itself. Perhaps
> you can take the time to
The way I cropped was to use the horizontal selection marquee tool and then
pressed Image>Crop in the menu of the image. When the crop was completed, I
had my nice cropped image BUT I also had a floating layer and thus 2 layers
in the layers palette. The only tool which would appear on the image
i used to teach in a college setting but in a non-art dept. the commercial
art courses were all given with adobe products. this was good from one
standpoint, i.e. that the students would be using the programs that an ad
agency or similar would be using. It was bad from the standpoint though
that
Hi,
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 09:57 -0400, carol irvin wrote:
> The Mac doesn't have right click. Instead, you use with your left
> hand the control key and with your
> right the mouse bar on the macbook (or a left mouse button if you were
> using an actual mouse). I have
> used this on the float
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 23:31 +0200, Pere Pujal i Carabantes wrote:
> I see the "Recently Used" (files) entry in file-chooser. Can it hold
> "Recently Used Dirs" ?
For the Save dialog, this would probably make more sense than presenting
recently used files. Would probably make sense to bring t
On Monday 01 October 2007 16:41:02 carol irvin wrote:
> I've done some photography but usually I end up painting over it and
> converting it to mixed media as I really prefer painting to photography. I
> think for users who are drawn to art and painting, GIMP may satisfy their
> needs more easily.
On Friday 28 September 2007 17:28:36 jim feldman wrote:
> Greg wrote:
> > I appreciate all the info and discussion on this. It's a lot more than
> > I expected...and that's a good thing.
> >
> > I guess what I really want to know is, am I going to see any noticeable
> > loss if image quality from
On Monday 01 October 2007 16:09:23 jim feldman wrote:
> Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > * Greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-01-07 13:29]
> >
> >> In any event, from what you've told me, GIMP may not be the right tool
> >> for me at this time. I want to retain all my bits. So until GIMP
> >> natively suppo
<>
The Mac doesn't have right click. Instead, you use with your left hand the
control key and with your
right the mouse bar on the macbook (or a left mouse button if you were using
an actual mouse). I have
used this on the floating layer and no context menu comes up. so i think
that one limitat
> Von: "carol irvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It kept happening no matter what I tried UNTIL I tried this anchoring.
You can also turn floating selections into new layers.
The interesting question is how you did get crop to produce a floating
selection in the first place.
Either the definition of
Hi!
El dg 30 de 09 del 2007 a les 12:10 +0200, en/na Sven Neumann va
escriure:
> The application can already add bookmarks and GIMP 2.4 already makes use
> of this feature in some places.
I see the "Recently Used" (files) entry in file-chooser. Can it hold
"Recently Used Dirs" ?
> I am not co
32 matches
Mail list logo
