John Culleton wrote:
>
> There seems to be some overlap between the facilities of Gimp and the
> faciites of ImageMagick. Is there a general rule when you would use one and
> when you would use the other?
OK, one more plug for anyone who missed it on the other thread -
I've written a simple batc
Hi John -
In general, use the GIMP for working on images by hand, one-off
stuff, retouching, and anything that needs your keen eye and
steady hand every step of the way. Use ImageMagick for all the
batch stuff: mass conversions from one image format to another,
creating a bunch of thumbnail
Geoffrey wrote:
>
> I'd like to take a batch of gimp files (*.xcf) and apply the same -geom
> to them all. I've successfully done this, but the images lose their
> transparency. Anyone know how I can do this and retain the transparency?
I've got a simple batch processor plugin for the Gimp whi
Maybe the GUG organisers have shut down the mailing list while they get
their act together, John.
I haven't received my digest for several days now.
GUG recently changed its mail-list handler and the list was immediately
submerged in spam,
especially of a pornographic nature.
You get more precis
On 2002-01-25 at 1011.18 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed this mail:
> Great info! Thanks! Are the GIMP developers actively trying to "keep
> pace" w/ PhotoShop features and functionality or is the GIMP going in it's
> own direction? Also, are there any GIMP converts who have converted from
>
Great info! Thanks! Are the GIMP developers actively trying to "keep pace" w/ PhotoShop features and functionality or is the GIMP going in it's own direction? Also, are there any GIMP converts who have converted from PhotoShop to the GIMP?
Peace..
Tom
My DVD Collection
Carol Spear
On 2002-01-25 at 1214.37 -0500, John Culleton typed this mail:
> There seems to be some overlap between the facilities of Gimp and the
> faciites of ImageMagick. Is there a general rule when you would use one and
> when you would use the other?
>
>
i was able convert 500 photos into gray-scale
first the gug list was sending "Subject: [gug]-less"
then it refused my mail. the gug mailman is just down right now i am
sure that t0mcat will get it working soon.
however, several linuxy sites disappeared recently, maybe gug lost the
mail-list server. i don't know what the set up is over the
There seems to be some overlap between the facilities of Gimp and the
faciites of ImageMagick. Is there a general rule when you would use one and
when you would use the other?
--
John Culleton, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Able Indexers and Typesetters
http://wexfordpress.com
<-
Thanks Jeff! :)
Peace
Tom
My DVD Collection
Jeff Trefftzs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
01/24/02 06:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP 1.2.3-pre2 and fonts question
Tom -
I'd like to take a batch of gimp files (*.xcf) and apply the same -geom
to them all. I've successfully done this, but the images lose their
transparency. Anyone know how I can do this and retain the transparency?
I'm using convert. I could do this with GIMP, but it's over a 100+
images and
I tried to join Gimp User Group but when I replied to their confimration
message it was refused:
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at sunsite.dk.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. So
dear gimp-users,
I just started to use gimp for my current project.
The hole project runs in batch-mode so I need the Scdipt-fu
commands.
I´m working on a linuxsystem (suse 7.1) and i
think the latest version of gimp is installed?!
i have a tiff with indexed coulors (xxx.tif
1232x686
John Aughey wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Peter Buckenleib wrote:
> > is there a way to correct optical distortions of wide-angle lenses ( most
> > annoing within architectural pics ) using gimp ?
>
> It sounds like you want something that you don't have to create yourself.
> That doesn't exis
14 matches
Mail list logo
