he overlay to make people switch:
https://github.com/Sabayon/mate-overlay/issues/76
--
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
code and get the
people you want to change the rules for to be interested in your work.
> Footnotes
>
> [1] Those who are politically active constantly deal with the more
> politically naive who complain "there isn't really any difference
&g
to do for the benefit of making a ton of users happy in the future.
TL;DR: A simple equation: If someone stops development upstream,
someone else needs to start developing to keep that work{,ing}.
--
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org
e tree, feel free
to let me know; this migration is supposed to go very fluent, so,
removing the overlay from layman should work out well.
--
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e packages to the
versions that are in the Portage tree; if not, please let me know.
Good luck and thank you in advance.
--
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2
e itself, Gentoo might not
be the right distribution for you as it is all about providing choice.
Compare this to other distributions which make the choices for you;
interesting to note, a lot of those distributions picked systemd,
instead of it being forced Gentoo actually blocks it for you to c
about backtracking, try --backtrack=9001 or so;
also, if it still tries to bring in sys-power/upower then you might
have an overlay that attempts to do this (sync and/or contact author).
As a result of the unmerge and mask, it picks upower-pm-utils for you.
> Have a great evening!
You too.
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 6/14/2014 1:02 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Tanstaafl
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> *Why* was it removed/no longer needed? And why was it needed previously?
>>
>> Read the ChangeLog for sys-fs/udev, specifically the entry
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 6/14/2014 2:15 PM, Tom H wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Tanstaafl
>> wrote:
>>> On 6/14/2014 1:02 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Tanstaafl
>>>> w
un a new core file through gdb.
--
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
18 seconds.
> snip
> > Wed May 28 14:07:43 2014 >>> net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.2.6
> >merge time: 1 hour, 39 minutes and 57 seconds.
>
> > Rich
>
>
> What syntax did you use to get this information?
$ genlop -t net-libs/webkit-gtk
> curious
do anything further.
Hmm, that "no screens found" indicates a problem with the X server I
think; can you look at /var/log/Xorg.0.log and/or provide it to us?
--
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
GPG F
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:39 PM, wrote:
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
>>
>> Some months ago I found myself wondering why I had ruby on this box at all. A
>> little poking around revealed that the only thing that needed it was thin-
>> provisioning. Once I'd added -thin to my USE flags and recompiled
on` will work.
It for example needs the *-launch things between exec and gnome-session.
--
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
signature.as
On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 15:20:26 -0400
cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> Tom Wijsman wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 22:36:14 +0300
> > Gevisz wrote:
> >
> > > Are you sure that you need gdm at all?
> >
> > Yes, `startx` doesn't work well in GNOME
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 4:01 AM, James wrote:
>
> After copying the current ".config" to the newly linked sources
> (/usr/src/linux) I use to run 'make oldconfig'. Now, looking at
> the gentoo wiki [1] I see (2) choices but no 'make oldconfig'::
>
> 1) #make silentoldconfig
>
> 2) #make olddefconf
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:42 PM, James wrote:
>>>
>>> 1) #make silentoldconfig
>>> 2) #make olddefconfig
>>> 3) #make oldconfig
>>>
>>> (3) still seems to work. (2) uses defaults so I do not want that,
>>> but what about (1)? What's the difference between (1) and (3) ?
>>> Where do I read about t
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:52 AM, James wrote:
> Tom H gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> Perhaps:
>> /usr/src/linux/scripts/kconfig/Makefile
>> /usr/src/linux/scripts/kconfig/conf.c
>
> thx,
You're welcome.
I'm not too sure what you're looking for b
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
> I'm planning on adding USE=cron to mail-filter/spamassassin to perform
> nightly updates. I have a script that works for OpenRC,
>
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/SpamAssassin#Daily_updates
>
> but I've commented where I would like to hav
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 9:23 AM, J. wrote:
>
> SYSTEMD_INIT_PID=`pgrep -o -U 0 systemd`
Doesn't systemd call "init" rather "systemd" if you use the "sysv-utils" flag?
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 6:27 PM, J. wrote:
> El dom, 05-06-2016 a las 12:09 -0400, Michael Orlitzky escribió:
>>
>> Does that happen with rc-service, too? Or only with the init script
>> (which uses openrc-run)? I recently updated the job on the wiki to
>> use rc-service after we've checked that it
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 8:19 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 12:29 PM, James wrote:
>>
>> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/2016-June/014964.html
>
> That's pretty old news. In any case, you certainly don't need to use
> systemd as your DNS resolver if you don't
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 06/06/2016 06:04 PM, Tom H wrote:
>> 1) I've never used systemd on Gentoo but I assume that you can
>> co-install openrc and systemd. So you'd want to check whether systemd
>> is running:
>>
>
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 6:29 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> I think I've gotten burned out talking about the advantages of systemd
> on Gentoo lists. If anybody wants to chat about it feel free to ping
> me via email or irc, but not in a channel.
You're giving up far too early! There are a few more
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:53 PM, José Maldonado wrote:
>
> The last days, ArsTechnica publish this new:
>
> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/06/goodbye-apt-and-yum-ubuntus-snap-apps-are-coming-to-distros-everywhere/
>
> "Snaps now work natively on Arch, Debian, Fedora, Kubuntu,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 7:40 PM, José Maldonado wrote:
> El 16/06/16 a las 13:32, Tom H escribió:
>>
>> When I first saw this, I thought "strange, maybe if Gentoo develops an
>> 'esnap' in order to build the container-package locally" but then I
>>
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:25 PM, J. wrote:
> They say it's not a GNOME thing only, but born in the GNOME project,
> Quote from their FAQ:
>
> "Is Flatpak tied to GNOME?
>
> No. While Flatpak has been developed by people with a long involvement
> in the GNOME community it is not tied to any desk
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Andreas K. Huettel
wrote:
>
> Gentoo support for Snap is roughly as "official" as RedHat/Fedora support.
>
> See also
> https://www.happyassassin.net/2016/06/16/on-snappy-and-flatpak-business-as-usual-in-the-canonical-propaganda-department/
>
> Quoting from there:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 3:57 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> Does anyone have a pointer to where Gnome 3 (3.20 in my case) stores my
> wifi credentials?
>
> I would love to sync that over to my new laptop without re-entering PSKs
> at customers.
Unless Gnome changes the default (which I doubt
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
> I'm a dino since I still use grub-1 but I prefer recent kernels (currently
> 4.70-rc4)
>
> I don't understand the 'root=' option on the boot line like
> kernel /boot/vmlinuz-4.7.0-rc4 root=/dev/sda1
>
> Here my bad experience:
>
> Having
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 06/25/2016 10:19:12 PM, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> You can use "root=PARTUUID=partuuid" where
>>
>> on an msdos-labeled disk:
>>
>> # findmnt / -o TARGET,SOURCE,PARTUUID
>> TARGET SOURCE
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Adam Carter wrote:
>
> I'm trying to troubleshoot a newly setup nfs server, which, sometimes has a
> 30 second pause (tcpdump shows its server waiting).
>
> # time touch /usr/portage/distfiles/testfile
>
> real0m30.088s
> user0m0.000s
> sys 0m0.001s
>
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Adam Carter wrote:
>> I don't use systemd on Gentoo but for the nfs-utils upstream-shipped
>> systemd units that I think that Gentoo's using, you have to re-run
>> nfs-config.service - or run the script that it calls - in order to
>> update the "/run/sysconfig/n
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Adam Carter wrote:
Does "/var/lib/nfs/v4recovery/" exist?
>>>
>>> No
>>> # ls /var/lib/nfs/
>>> etab export-lock rmtab rpc_pipefs sm sm.bak state xtab
>>
>> IIRC, it's needed to avoid this delay. I thought that I'd saved a url
>> about this but I can't find
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 3:37 AM, Adam Carter wrote:
> I've added the directory, and after restarting syslog now has new entries;
>>
>> kernel: [912267.948883] NFSD: Using /var/lib/nfs/v4recovery as the NFSv4
>> state recovery directory
>> kernel: NFSD: Using /var/lib/nfs/v4recovery as the NFSv4
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 2:56 AM, Artur Zych wrote:
>
> If you're using GPT disk and want to use uefi then you can just create
> one efi partition (should be around 200-500mb (depends if you're
> planning on using multiple systems on the same disk) - this will hold
> .efi files for all your systems
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On 26 July 2016 10:29:08 CEST, Tom H wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 2:56 AM, Artur Zych wrote:
>>>
>>> If you're using GPT disk and want to use uefi then you can just create
>>> one efi partitio
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 8:10 AM, Artur Zych wrote:
> 26 lip 2016 10:29 "Tom H" napisał(a):
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 2:56 AM, Artur Zych wrote:
>>>
>>> If you're using GPT disk and want to use uefi then you can just create
>>> one efi parti
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 15:40:45 +0500, Azamat Hackimov wrote:
>>
>> You know, this is very unusual configuration. I don't even can imagine
>> why you need both of them.
>>
>> In order to resolve mutual block, you need to remove "!mail-mta/postfix"
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Peter Humphrey
> wrote:
>>
>> Well, according to eix, there's only 4.4.19 between 4.1.30 and 4.7.2.
>
> Those are just the versions packaged for Gentoo.
>
> kernel.org has 4.4.19 as the only non-EOL version
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
> Following today's marking of gummiboot as to be deleted in a month, I had a
> look at efibootmgr in the wiki pages. It looks as though I'll be able to use
> it instead, but one thing puzzles me: is it possible to create a set of
> configs
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Håkon Alstadheim
> wrote:
>> Booting straight into linux on an EFI system without a boot-loader means
>> you have no way to provide command-line or initramfs as far as I can
>> tell, all modules must be comp
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 16:16:00 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
>>> Call it Part 1 or Volume 1 if you prefer, the handbook itself doesn't
>>> give such a label to the four sections. I meant the part called
>>> "1. Installing Gentoo".
>>
>> Great, w
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Christopher Robinson
wrote:
>
> Again thanks for a specific reply, unlike Dale and Neil's.
Is this necessary?!
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Miroslav Rovis
wrote:
>
> Ah, I almost forgot. Gentoo is as default (OpenRC) without dbus! Have a
> look:
>
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Comparison_of_init_systems
>
> There is no D-Bus under "Main dependencies" for OpenRC (I really like
> OpenRC...)
There's no
pam_stack.so service=system-auth
sessionrequired pam_stack.so service=system-auth
auth required /lib/security/pam_warn.so
auth required /lib/security/pam_deny.so
- -
If I remember correctly, the last two lines are the lines you need.
HTH
Tom
Peet
501 - 546 of 546 matches
Mail list logo
