On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:19:13 -0500
Randy Barlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Plus no PHP on my server.
How can you have a webserver without PHP? I cringe : )
> I like Thunderbird.
I don't. Thunderbird is, like most mozilla products, slow an bloated.
Claws-Mail (as sylpheed is now called, B
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:11:19 +0100
Dirk Heinrichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> leave it out completely on systems with >=1G RAM, but there may be
> cases where swap is needed even with this large amount of memory.
I don't think this is wise, as context switching in low-memory
scenarios seems to p
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 09:50:33 +
"Benjamen R. Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I set up a server system a little while ago, and in performing updates
> to portage it ran out of disk space as I didn't quite allow enough
> space on the root partition (3.8 GB). As a result, I took a partition
>
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:31:58 -0800
Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Multiple great ideas have already been suggested in this
> > > > thread. Is this the first time they've been conceived and
> > > > shared? Why hasn't work begun on them? Why isn't work
> > > > completed on them? Becaus
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:24:01 +0100
Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which would add an awful lot of complexity and require major design
> changes in order to gain anything. The beauty of the ebuild format is
> its simplicity. I don't really think it's worth it.
I agree. I have not
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:40:48 -0600
Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Philip Webb wrote:
> > 071218 Sergey Kobzar wrote:
> >
> >> - ReiserFS looks unsupported now
> >>
> >
> > What do you base that assessment on ? It's true
> > that RFS 4 was going nowhere even before its creator's legal
>
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:09:09 -0800
Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have a web server they would lend me a page of? I have
> one but it hosts my business website and I don't want it to become the
> target of super-savvy folk. ftp, ssh, even copy-paste would be
> greatly appreciated
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:19:47 +
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just to clarify the situation, Sylpheed is still Sylpheed.
> Sylpheed-Claws became Claws-Mail since it no longer follows the
> Sylpheed code.
right; sorry. i started using it right when that was happening.
--
[EMAIL P
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:08:36 -0600
Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It makes me wonder if the drives are "sensitive" to something. This
> seems to be common with Maxtor. Is Hitachi made by the same company
> as Maxtor I wonder?
I've been told Hitachi bought up IBM's drive manufacturing operati
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 06:39:33 +0100
"Hemmann, Volker Armin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 3. Januar 2008, Grant wrote:
> > My card reader works if an SD card is inserted when the system is
> > booted. If the card is inserted after the system is already booted,
> > /dev/mmcblk0 never a
tances of NFSD", and "5.5. Overflow of Fragmented Packets" were
interesting to me.
Finally, NFS4 is reputed to be much faster in certain cases.
Hope that helps. I would be very interested in your findings.
Be well,
Dan Farrell
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 04:19:08 +0100
Alex Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to harden the gentoo running on my little server, but I'm a
> little worried about possible problems. Like, services not coming up
> when rebooting after an emerge -e world. Do you see any possibility
> for that?
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:04:28 -0800
"Mark Knecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe I should run my own portage server here for our 6 home
> machines?
You could then sync once for the lot of them, rather than for each.
You might find that convenient, and the servers might appreciate it
too.
--
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:32:19 -0800 (PST)
maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi group,
>
> Now emerge -uD world barfs at pam-0.99 and directs me
> to
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/pam/upgrade-0.99.xml
>
> Here, among other things, it says to edit certain
> files, but it doesn't
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:49:48 +0100
Alex Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Farrell writes:
>
> > Alex Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I want to harden the gentoo running on my little server, but I'm a
> > > little worried abo
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 23:44:59 +0100
"Liviu Andronic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks all for their respective input. From the information provided,
> I've assembled a short Gentoo Wiki Tip [1].
>
> Regards,
> Liviu
>
> [1] http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_Reboot_to_Windows_(using_grub)
Thanks; I've
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 10:27:24 -0800
Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well thank you for that. I had planned on setting up port knocking
> for ssh and cups but I guess I'm just as well off leaving them
> listening on 22 and 631?
Fail2Ban, though a little intensive, seems to be a decent method for
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 10:42:05 -0800
Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm currently printing a dynamic HTML web page via firefox, but I'm
> trying to switch to a method that will allow me to print across the
> internet in an automated fashion with lpr. I've tried printing a
> static HTML file with
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 07:27:12 -0800
Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Well thank you for that. I had planned on setting up port
> > > knocking for ssh and cups but I guess I'm just as well off
> > > leaving them listening on 22 and 631?
> >
> > Fail2Ban, though a little intensive, seems to be
> That's more or less what I'm trying to do. Is setting up a VPN
> between my remote server and local network overkill? I think the only
> thing I'd use it for is to hide the sending of these printouts.
I would speculate that a VPN for one service might be overkill, if that
service is easy to s
On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 08:06:47 -0800
kashani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Grant wrote:
> >> I don't know about large setups, where it might be very possible
> >> that port knocking becomes a major PITA as you say. But I have
> >> setup and used port knocking for remote ssh access lots of time in
> >
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:03:16 -0500
"Budd, Tracy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
People will appreciate it if you don't respond to unrelated posts.
Many mail browsers (my own included) organize by the in-reply-to header
(at least I think that's the one):
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and have probab
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 08:56:22 -0600
Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and
> Civilization III fails because some security module can't be found...
You might try a no-cd crack, if this is indeed caused by
copyprotection as I suspect. I think they're legal to use (if
you have a license
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:58:32 +0100
Mateusz Mierzwinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have problem with postfix. I just want to send email to other mail
> server from my new postfix/courier server.
Could you elaborate on your configuration? Are you...
- relaying mail to a specific
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 18:50:51 +
Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 28 January 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:10:18 +0100, Stefán István wrote:
> > > can I set up the network startup so that eth0 first tries to get
> > > address from a dhcp server, and if it doesn
On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 21:32:47 +0100
Mateusz Mierzwinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mateusz Mierzwinski pisze:
> > Ok, I don't know what's going on, but My laptop have issue - when I
> > press ALT/GR (Right ALT) it works like RETURN, executes
> > applications, sends messages by Kadu. What's wrong
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 13:27:50 -0800
"Mark Knecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd really like to share my ext3 file server with my Windows machines
> without being forced to use windows file systems.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
If you want to get files to windows hosts that aren't running
(dual-boot), you
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 12:25:25 -0800
Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I would set up openvpn on my remote server and connect to it from:
here's a few ideas about the subject, some options to think about.
> 1. my local print server for printing
Look into routed vpn networks. If I were in yo
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 13:34:07 +
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought the point of the question was to avoid waiting for the GRUB
> menu to appear.
I sometimes forget that some people actually use XP as an alternate OS
(for me it's just there in case I forget how bored with games
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:04:27 +
Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the context of online banking, where Windows of some flavour is
> the desktop OS, I see a substantial risk arising through spyware
> and/or viruses. I suspect that a neat way to mitigate this would be
> to run an OS from a C
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 13:28:39 +0100
Etaoin Shrdlu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > BTW,
> > I am more interested to get things working. Quality would be my
> > second priority.
>
> As I said before, I did not have any problem (unfortunately, I cannot
> access the hardware now and check the bandw
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 04:46:48 -0600
Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Saturday 09 February 2008 04:35:35 Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> >
> >
> >> *This .sig left intentionally blank*
> >>
> >
> > It did? Where did it leave for?
> >
> >
>
> That reminds me of the
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 04:10:56 -0600
Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Florian Philipp wrote:
> >
> >
> > Malware for Linux? What about those macro viruses for Open Office?
> > Every cross platform software such as Mozilla derivatives, java
> > based stuff like Azureus and so on is a possible targe
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 07:16:44 -0800
Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My server's current IMAP setup is only used with squirrelmail so it
> doesn't have to communicate over the internet. I'm trying to ditch
> squirrelmail for claws-mail
good choice.
>and I'm having a little trouble making the
>
my guess is that courier hasn't been told where to look for the mails.
If you can see them from squirrelmail but not imap, that's probably the
problem.
furthermore you can diagnose connection problems seperately from
missing mail problems. ( claws-mail has a convenient log feature for
connections
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 19:47:48 -0700
Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do I need to re-compile phpmyadmin with "vhost"? and setup phpmyadmin
> as virtualdomain?
I recommend that you do, to avoid htdocs 'bloat'.
however that's unlikely to solve your problem. It sounds like,
perhaps, apache is m
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 22:29:15 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sorry for the OT, but unable to raise anyone at comcast right now.
Really? I didn't think that was possible... although sometimes it's
good to call twice, get another opinion.
> I think I recall having read somewhere that one can do
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 11:53:31 -0800
Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > my guess is that courier hasn't been told where to look for the
> > mails. If you can see them from squirrelmail but not imap, that's
> > probably the problem.
>
> But squirrelmail doesn't work if I stop imapd, so imapd must
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:55:49 +
Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 10 February 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If the authentication is configured at the PC/client end rather than
> the modem, then you are probably not using the correct encapsulation
> for the cable network and, or h
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:45:14 -0800
Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I still can't send mail though, with or without authentication. I get
> this when port scanning with nmap:
>
> 25/tcp filtered smtp
>
> Does that mean my host is blocking the smtp port?
It's possible. Or, perhaps you're b
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 06:02:01 -0800
Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I still can't send mail though, with or without authentication.
> > > I get this when port scanning with nmap:
> > >
> > > 25/tcp filtered smtp
> > >
> > > Does that mean my host is blocking the smtp port?
> >
> > It's pos
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:00:49 -0800
Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can print from your laptop to your printer at home while
> > overseas, for example.
Sounds very convenient ; )
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:28:16 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I happen to be in a situation where I have both a DSL and CABLE
> connection to internet up for the time being... (Until the DSL
> contract month runs out).
>
> It affords a nifty opportunity to do some experiments. Of course I
> test
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:14:59 -0500
Willie Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been waiting and waiting and waiting forever for DSL to come to
> my neighborhood just so that I can switch to a decent provider and rid
> myself of this nonsense.
Don't assume DSL will be better. They often block p
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 21:52:14 -0600
Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also had to change the IP address on the router to a fixed address
> to get it to work right. I think I had it set to 192.168.100.2.
> After that, we had very little trouble with the connection. The
> modem itself was 192.168
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 06:23:23 -0800
Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I cringe at the idea of having to use a VPN for imap, however.
>
> Why? Would you say the same of using it for SMTP?
I read email rather compulsively I guess, and would hate to be bothered
with VPNs, then use an encrypted m
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:55:29 +0100
Arnau Bria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> has someone changed the hard disk of that laptop? (or one from its
> family?)
> Any advice? May I buy a generic one?
>
> TIA,
>
judging by
http://es.computers.toshiba-europe.com/cgi-bin/ToshibaCSG/jsp/SUPPORTSEC
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:42:44 +0200
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What about having ssh, imap, smtp, cups, and possibly a non-standard
> > https port all hidden within a VPN? Should that be considered a
> > benefit of running a VPN?
One other thought about ssh+vpn, if you have VP
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:23:15 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dan Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> I wanted to try to gauge if there was much of a noticeable
> >> difference with the two IP connections. And it would be handy to
> >> just
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:19:48 -0800
Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Even if you just want to encrypt some clear-text protocol that
> > > > doesn't have an encrypted equivalent, a vpn is still overkill.
> > > > For that you use ssh tunneling (which is essentially the same
> > > > thing as a
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:57:07 -0500
John covici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi. I have just gotten a computer with a Super Micro c2sbe
> Motherboard. Now I also bought a dual port PCI Express ethernet
> card. Now the normal kernel driver in my 2.6.21-gentoo-r4 does not
> recognize the ethernet
I haven't been able to build sane-backends.
>make[1]: *** No rule to make target `libsane-sane-epson2.la', needed by
>`all'. Stop.
any thoughts?
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:34:16 -0600
Dan Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't been able to build sane-backends.
>
> >make[1]: *** No rule to make target `libsane-sane-epson2.la', needed
> >by `all'. Stop.
>
>
> any thoughts?
Wel
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:34:16 -0600
Dan Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't been able to build sane-backends.
>
> >make[1]: *** No rule to make target `libsane-sane-epson2.la', needed
> >by `all'. Stop.
>
>
> any thoughts?
Curses!
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:21:00 -0800
Michael Higgins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, OT post here, but:
>
> I (the office, actually) have this lousy ISP that sells mailboxes
> limited to 50MB. Whatever, I can't change that just now.
>
> I have need to keep all mail in one place... for safekeep
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:57:08 +0300
Andrew Gaydenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ehci module is loaded, all MB USB ports are USB 2 ports, printer is
> "USB 2 (Full Speed)" printer.
>
> Where to dig in? Which additional information must I supply?
>
>
> Andrew
just a guess, but do you have your ke
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 12:16:36 -0800
"Mark Knecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Chris Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Can anyone tell me what packages you know of that will break yo
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 02:04:31 -0500
"Ritesh Kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 8:23 PM, maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > > Doesn't Ghost work with Ext3? What can I do to
> > > recover my system without
> > > reinstalling from scratch?
> > >
> >
> > I've had
On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 21:21:48 +
Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>
> > On Samstag, 1. März 2008, b.n. wrote:
> >> maxim wexler ha scritto:
>
> >> > This is such an obvious fraud it makes me wonder at
> >> > his
ckup restorations rather than responding to particular error messages
and resolving their problems that way. Perhaps it's just the gentoo
way - reinstalling seems to be very popular in ubuntu.
Anyhow, my advice to you is to do what many, including myself do - save
yourself the headache
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 22:56:20 +0200
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's one other way that I just remembered (for future reference).
> You don't *have* to use a linux machine as a gateway if you have a
> decent managed switch - set it to route all traffic on all ports out
> through th
On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 14:02:40 +0100
Volker Armin Hemmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Essentially, the
> > antiailiasing seems to alter the consistency of fonts in an
> > irregular manner causing them to blur (differently) across the
> > screen, as if the monitor resolution is out of sync.
> >
hmm
On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 18:10:58 +
Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please find xorg.conf and Xorg.0.log attached. I am using the xorg
> radeon driver. The font size is just right, would not like to
> increase it.
>
A few thoughts based on your xorg.conf.
1) you set
HorizSync 64 #31 -
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 14:11:20 -0500 (EST)
"Jason Carson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are many interfaces but they are all frontends to iptables.
> Personally I just did a lot of reading and built my firewall from
> scratch.
that's the spirit ; )
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 20:16:09 -0400
"Mark Shields" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you thinking his ISP is doing port-based connection filtering?
What kind of connection filtering allows a connection to go through for
5 seconds, then resets it?
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
general feeling was that such a site would be greatly beneficial to
> the community here in gentoo as well.
>
> Would you be amenable to the idea of granting us permission to use the
> site engine?
>
> Thank you for your time,
>
> Dan Farrell
[2]
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-673136.html
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:04:22 -0600
Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is suposed to be here soon, I guess anyway.
>
> Dale
you've been saying that for so long now.
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:43:55 -0400
Mike Edenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Comcast?
I was on comcast for a long time (2.5 yrs) and never had a problem like
this. They might have blocked port 25 and squelched my bittorrenting
at times, but never anything like this. Of course, ymmv.
--
gen
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:51:42 +
Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 10 March 2008, Dan Farrell wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:43:55 -0400
> >
> > Mike Edenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Comcast?
> >
> > I was on com
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:00:41 -0700
"Mark Knecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Jamie Dobbs
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've been away from Gentoo for the last year or so and using Ubuntu
> > but find that I want to return to Gentoo simply because of the
> > le
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:27:22 + (UTC)
James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a firewall that is built pretty minimally on a P3 and
> and old 4 gig ide disk:
>
> /dev/hda3 2068348 1668104400244 81% /
> /dev/hda1 100728 40452 60276 41% /b
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:06:07 -0700
"Mark Knecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Dan Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:00:41 -0700
> > "Mark Knecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:45:21 +
Filipe Sousa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a few numbers from genlop -t
>
Thanks much! This was interesting for me to read. I am surprised by
how much faster 64bit system was for compiling these things.
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:10:54 -0500
Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I got a new USB trackball today. When I plug it into the computer,
> this shows up in dmesg:
>
> input: Logitech USB Trackball as /class/input/input6
> input: USB HID v1.10 Mouse [Logitech USB Trackball] on
> usb-00
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 18:46:49 + (UTC)
James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pongracz Istvan gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> > > I've got several boxen that need to be installed so I was hoping
> > > to test drive 2008.0
>
> > AFAIK the releng team are working on the next release (2008.0) but
> > I
On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 23:18:33 +0100
Neil Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Farrell wrote:
> > Install from 2007.0 with interet:
> > - most recent stage3
> > - most recent portage
> > therefore most recent system
> > Install from 2008.0-be
On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:18:05 -0600
darren kirby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> quoth the Dan Farrell:
>
> > net benefit of 2008.0: none.
>
> The benefit is that the beta gets tested, and we all move that much
> closer to a stable 2008.0 release.
True, I supp
On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 13:06:04 -0400
Steven Lembark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Main thing
> that speeds up the AMD box is using 320MB scsi's
> for near-term storage. They are hugely faster than
> [S]ATA or IDE used on most equipment these days.
what R/W speeds can you expect?
--
gentoo-user@list
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:19:11 -0230
Roger Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to configure the firewall on a client to allow that client
> to mount an nfs directory. The client runs a netfilter firewall, the
> server uses tcpwrapper.
>
> rpcinfo -p on the server shows:
>
>
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:59:46 -0300
Norberto Bensa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ubuntu patch indeed. For those interested:
>
...
Thanks for the source overview
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > First: Don't top post!
> >
>
> Big whoop! The two posts are tiny -- it's easy to see
> at a glance which is the original and which the reply.
>
What's with people making the biggest deal out of this? The ubun
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:07:14 +0200 (CEST)
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have 4 identical machines, they only differ in the 2 files
> /etc/conf.d/hostname
> /etc/conf.d/net
>
> I'd like to maintain only one of them (updating
> GenToo upto several times a week)
> and 'rsync' the other ones.
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:57:48 +0100
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Dealing with unexpected side
> effects of syncing in-use files could be a lot more problematic.
perhaps a digest of some kind? md5 the files, write up a little script
to keep the rest of the nodes synced up?
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:48:06 -0700
Grant wrote:
> It never
> made a sound before, but now there's a rhythmic grinding sound when
> miro is running, maybe because the HD is more full now.
In my experience, the rate of change of hard drive access volume is
inversely proportional with the drive's
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 07:42:24 -0700
Grant wrote:
> >> It never
> >> made a sound before, but now there's a rhythmic grinding sound when
> >> miro is running, maybe because the HD is more full now.
> >
> > In my experience, the rate of change of hard drive access volume is
> > inversely proportiona
On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 08:01:08 -0500
Dale wrote:
> Stroller wrote:
> > I considered suggesting contacting the owners of the site &
> > explaining how stupid it is to piss your customers off without
> > benefit, but if they're dumb enough to have implemented this in the
> > first place then there's
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:50:24 -0700 (PDT)
Kevin Haddock wrote:
> I changed the permissions on my machine. On the remote machine, it
> shouldn't need root permissions just to compile programs, right?
>
No, I don't think so.
You know, the remote admin might rather open up distcc to local
connec
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:32:18 -0600
Joseph wrote:
> Is anybody fixing Gentoo forum?
> When trying to access it I get:
>
> phpBB : Critical Error
> Could not connect to the database
>
I hope so : )
It went down some time after 6 this morning (CST - noon UTC).
I sent an email to "webmas...@foru
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 21:34:17 +0200
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On gentoo-dev there was a post a few days ago about the forums being
> > moved to a new server cluster. Perhaps something's not well with the
> > new setup.
>
> the move was some days ago.
And supposedly successfully completed
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 22:56:01 +0200
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> back then, yes. Maybe one of the new boxes suddenly combusted ;)
>
yes, well, I sure hope it takes more than one. they must have some
sort of replication thing going right? I mean, if _i_ were hosting
forums.gentoo.org I would t
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 22:54:54 +0100
Mick wrote:
> I noticed that (re)loading www.gentoo.org now takes around 10 seconds
> from the UK. This is a significant delay compared to usual
> performance. Not sure if people are loading this up to see what
> happened with the forums ...
Yeah, it's doing i
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:22:31 -0500
Dale wrote:
> I'm in the process of switching
> from dial-up to DSL. :-D :-D
Running gentoo on dialup for so long, you must be the most patient
person in existence.
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:54:52 -0500
Dale wrote:
> I'm starting to picture my 3/4 ton
> pick-up on top of that DSL box. It's starting to look pretty darn
> good too. Would sort of miss the ole truck tho.
>
But then you'll be back to dialup indefinitely
... i wonder if you could get high
Last week the gentoo forums went down. Then gentoo-wiki.com went down.
Now it seems as though all of gentoo.org is down.
What's the deal? What are we to do about this shoddy hosting?
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:01:53 +0200
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> gentoo-wiki has nothing to do with gentoo.org.
>
> Nothing.
Sure, they're completely seperate ... officially. But that's not the
point. For good or for ill, gentoo-wiki is - or at least used to be
before the hosting fiasco late
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:05:07 +0200
pk wrote:
> gentoo.org works for me (both this afternoon, around 15.00 and right
> now, 20.03). f.g.o. also works right now. g-w.com also works.
Your're all right; the gentoo.org thing must have been a transient
hiccough somewhere between me and them. Forum i
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:12:07 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> So what do you suggest? I mean, other than whinging about something
> that Gentoo can do absolutely nothing about, what do you suggest one
> actually DOES?
>
That is exactly my question. Is it important to do something, is it
wise, and
i'm sorry to everyone, i started a bit of a heated debate.
i didn't mean to imply that the gentoo sites hosting is less than
adequate. I think the gentoo sites do a good job. I couldn't bring up
the site for like 3 seconds today, and wouldn't you know it, I
mentioned it on the mailing lists, and
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 04:27:57 +0300
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 08/18/2009 02:00 AM, Dale wrote:
> > I agree, this should be reported so it can be fixed. While
> > init-/bin/bash would work, it shouldn't be the only option.
>
> I filed a bug for it: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28185
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:11:36 -0400
"Walter Dnes" wrote:
> IPCHAINS did the firewall job for me. Early versions of IPTABLES
> were OK too. But it eventually developed the Mozilla disease, and
> became a honking big routing/gatewaying/QOSing/singing/dancing
> monstrosity, of which I required on
1 - 100 of 536 matches
Mail list logo
