Le ven. 6 déc. 2019 23:57, Caveman Al Toraboran <
toraboracave...@protonmail.com> a écrit :
> any idea when?
>
> rgrds,
> cm.
>
Hello all,
I use Blender 2.81 and it works quite fine. Eevee render is fine.
Nevertheless, be careful if using old blend file with 2.81 Blender, you may
lose your data
On Friday, 6 December 2019 11:38:09 GMT n952162 wrote:
> I rebuilt my kernel and now have the Network Block Device, but now my
> system doesn't power off anymore, using shutdown -h now, and doesn't
> reboot with reboot (orshutdown -r now).
I'm not sure which kernel you said you're running at prese
On 12/07/19 13:17, Mick wrote:
On Friday, 6 December 2019 11:38:09 GMT n952162 wrote:
I rebuilt my kernel and now have the Network Block Device, but now my
system doesn't power off anymore, using shutdown -h now, and doesn't
reboot with reboot (orshutdown -r now).
I'm not sure which kernel you
thing is, i already have a blender file created with 2.80. i cannot open it
with 2.79.
any idea what's the easiest way to get 2.80 or 2.81 running on gentoo?
and any idea how when to expect the 2.80 or 2.81?
rgrds,
cm.
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Orig
On 12/07 03:39, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
> thing is, i already have a blender file created with 2.80. i cannot open it
> with 2.79.
>
> any idea what's the easiest way to get 2.80 or 2.81 running on gentoo?
>
> and any idea how when to expect the 2.80 or 2.81?
>
> rgrds,
> cm.
>
> Sent wit
On 12/07/2019 04:39:34 PM, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
thing is, i already have a blender file created with 2.80. i cannot
open it
with 2.79.
any idea what's the easiest way to get 2.80 or 2.81 running on gentoo?
and any idea how when to expect the 2.80 or 2.81?
You could copy the attache
On Friday, 6 December 2019 17:42:44 GMT Ralph Seichter wrote:
> ULA support, or rather the ability to assign additional static IPv6
> addresses to an interface, depends on the router's firmware. If you can
> make it work, https://cd34.com/rfc4193/ can help you generate a ULA
> prefix.
I can't app
On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 10:19 AM n952162 wrote:
>
> On 12/07/19 13:17, Mick wrote:
>
> > On Friday, 6 December 2019 11:38:09 GMT n952162 wrote:
> >> I rebuilt my kernel and now have the Network Block Device, but now my
> >> system doesn't power off anymore, using shutdown -h now, and doesn't
> >> r
On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 2:13 PM Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 10:19 AM n952162 wrote:
> >
> > On 12/07/19 13:17, Mick wrote:
> >
> > > On Friday, 6 December 2019 11:38:09 GMT n952162 wrote:
> > >> I rebuilt my kernel and now have the Network Block Device, but now my
> > >> system
Well, I managed to get my hands on a Ryzen 3950x.
I figured I should be updating the microcode... so I set up early
updating but it isn't doing anything.
dmesg is listing what the current microcode level is. The problem is, I
can't find anywhere that lists what the current (or latest) microco
On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 9:39 AM Daniel Frey wrote:
> Well, I managed to get my hands on a Ryzen 3950x.
>
Nice.
I figured I should be updating the microcode... so I set up early
> updating but it isn't doing anything.
>
> dmesg is listing what the current microcode level is. The problem is, I
> c
I just ran a system update and got the following warning...
!!! The following installed packages are masked:
- sys-devel/automake-1.9.6-r5::gentoo (masked by: package.mask)
/usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
# Andreas K. Hüttel (2017-10-18)
# sys-devel/automake versions 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.
I just ran a system update and got the following message...
=
WARNING: One or more updates/rebuilds have been skipped due to a dependency
conflict:
dev-python/setuptools:0
(dev-python/setuptools-40.6.3:0/0::gentoo, ebuild schedule
On 2019.12.07 19:37, Walter Dnes wrote:
I just ran a system update and got the following warning...
!!! The following installed packages are masked:
- sys-devel/automake-1.9.6-r5::gentoo (masked by: package.mask)
/usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
# Andreas K. Hüttel (2017-10-18)
# sys-deve
Walter Dnes wrote:
> I just ran a system update and got the following warning...
>
> !!! The following installed packages are masked:
> - sys-devel/automake-1.9.6-r5::gentoo (masked by: package.mask)
> /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
> # Andreas K. Hüttel (2017-10-18)
> # sys-devel/automake
Dale wrote:
> Walter Dnes wrote:
>> I just ran a system update and got the following warning...
>>
>> !!! The following installed packages are masked:
>> - sys-devel/automake-1.9.6-r5::gentoo (masked by: package.mask)
>> /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
>> # Andreas K. Hüttel (2017-10-18)
>>
Am Sonntag, 8. Dezember 2019, 01:37:17 CET schrieb Walter Dnes:
> I just ran a system update and got the following warning...
>
> !!! The following installed packages are masked:
> - sys-devel/automake-1.9.6-r5::gentoo (masked by: package.mask)
> /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
> # Andreas K
On 2019-12-07 16:22, Adam Carter wrote:
I dont know, so i just use the ~amd64 linux-firmware version. For my
3900X its currently;
microcode: CPU0: patch_level=0x08701013
The last update came through in October;
firmware-md5s-2019-09-09.txt:fef89be989f6a160b340027a24cd0a16
/lib/firmware/amd
On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 7:22 PM Adam Carter wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 9:39 AM Daniel Frey wrote:
>>
>> Does anyone know of a list of microcode versions?
>
> I dont know, so i just use the ~amd64 linux-firmware version. For my 3900X
> its currently;
> microcode: CPU0: patch_level=0x0870101
> > firmware-md5s-2019-11-12.txt:a30e5f81d37ed38faf039b75bc376197
> > /lib/firmware/amd-ucode/microcode_amd_fam17h.bin
> >
> >
>
> Drat, mine is 0x08701011. That means for some reason it's not doing an
> early microcode update in the kernel.
>
> I'll have to figure out why it's not applying. I fo
On Sun, Dec 08, 2019 at 02:13:47AM +0100, Marc Joliet wrote
>
> openrdate does not appear to be in the portage tree (it was removed on
> 2019-09-17, specifically because of its dependency on automake 1.9).
> I suppose you put it in a local overlay or something?
===
21 matches
Mail list logo
