On Sun, 26 Nov 2017 02:30:11 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > As an everyday user of KMail, I am completely happy with using it. I
> > don't see any flaws with it. Maybe it's just me or...? Is there a
> > reason behind the hostile glare towards KMail?
>
> Do you have POP3 or IMAP-4 accounts?
>
On 26.11.2017 03:30, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> I get duplicate messages, which are a known problem and easily worked
> around, but the latest version of KMail whinges about more than one
> candidate for display and just gives up.
For debugging purposes it might help you to know that you actually se
On 26 November 2017 03:30:11 GMT+01:00, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
>On Saturday, 25 November 2017 16:20:46 GMT Jalus Bilieyich wrote:
>> As an everyday user of KMail, I am completely happy with using it. I
>> don't see any flaws with it. Maybe it's just me or...? Is there a
>reason
>> behind the hosti
On 24 November 2017 18:30:22 GMT+01:00, Rich Freeman wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Ralph Seichter
> wrote:
>> On 24.11.17 16:39, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>>
>>> I'm trying an evasion, which is to use fetchmail to retrieve emails
>>> from my ISP and deliver them to postfix, which can then
On Sunday, 26 November 2017 06:58:06 GMT Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 26/11/2017 04:30, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Saturday, 25 November 2017 16:20:46 GMT Jalus Bilieyich wrote:
> >> As an everyday user of KMail, I am completely happy with using it. I
> >> don't see any flaws with it. Maybe it's jus
On Sunday, 26 November 2017 10:00:40 GMT Ralph Seichter wrote:
> On 26.11.2017 03:30, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > I get duplicate messages, which are a known problem and easily worked
> > around, but the latest version of KMail whinges about more than one
> > candidate for display and just gives up.
On Sunday, 26 November 2017 10:22:26 GMT J. Roeleveld wrote:
> I use kmail a lot on my desktop and laptop and have not noticed that in a
> very long time. It has actually been quite stable.
I use it on 3 different boxen. Two of them in daily usage have frequent
problems of dups and random resyn
Yes, I have an IMAP account provided by GMail.
On 11/26/2017 12:58 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 26/11/2017 04:30, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> On Saturday, 25 November 2017 16:20:46 GMT Jalus Bilieyich wrote:
>>> As an everyday user of KMail, I am completely happy with using it. I
>>> don't see any f
On 2017-11-26 11:00, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=peak.localnet)
> by smarthost03d.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtps
> (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256)
> (Exim 4.80)
> (envelope-from )
> id 1eImhw-IJ-SK
> for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; S
On 26.11.2017 18:46, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> those are Exim's local IDs, assigned by the list server host. Those
> are distinct from RFc 5322 Message-IDs, which are the closest thing
> to uniquely identify a message.
I am well aware of this, and this is exactly what I wanted to point out.
> So fr
On 2017.11.26 13:46, Ralph Seichter wrote:
On 26.11.2017 18:46, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> FWIW, I am _not_ seeing any duplicates on this list [...]
Does NeoMutt perhaps suppress dupes based on message ID? Thunderbird
obviously does not.
Balsa has a Remove Duplicates command, but I don't
On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 09:07:24 -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> > You do have a choice, use /etc/portage/env. here's one I have to patch
> > a specific version of a package
> >
> > % cat env/app-cdr/cdrdao-1.2.3
> > post_src_unpack() {
> > cd "${S}"
> > epatch_user
> > }
>
> Again I
On 26/11/17 18:46, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> Does NeoMutt perhaps suppress dupes based on message ID? Thunderbird
> obviously does not.
Thunderbird has an add-on that will delete duplicates. I make regular
use of it :-(
Cheers,
Wol
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
> On 26/11/17 18:46, Ralph Seichter wrote:
>> Does NeoMutt perhaps suppress dupes based on message ID? Thunderbird
>> obviously does not.
>
> Thunderbird has an add-on that will delete duplicates. I make regular
> use of it :-(
>
You'll find this
On 2017-11-26 16:46, Rich Freeman wrote:
> You'll find this recipe all over the place, but with procmail you can
> do this:
> https://mymegabyte.com/2010/03/filter-duplicate-emails-with-procmail/
I don't trust procmail anymore after CVE-2017-16844. It took me a long
time, I had a weak spot for i
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>
> I don't trust procmail anymore after CVE-2017-16844.
Uh, thanks. Hadn't even heard of that one, but I was on vacation when
it hit I think.
Bug 522114 has a link to the patch, which works fine with eapply_user
with the latest revision of
Hello,
On Sun, 26 Nov 2017, Neil Bothwick wrote:
[..]
>% cat /etc/portage/env/media-video/vcdimager-0.7.24
>post_src_unpack() {
>cd "${S}"
>epatch_user
>}
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki//etc/portage/patches#Enabling_.2Fetc.2Fportage.2Fpatches_for_all_ebuilds
HTH,
-dnh
--
Yah. Spam, spam,
17 matches
Mail list logo
