On 2017-11-26 11:00, Ralph Seichter wrote: > Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=peak.localnet) > by smarthost03d.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtps > (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) > (Exim 4.80) > (envelope-from <pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk>) > id 1eImhw-0000IJ-SK > for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 02:30:12 +0000 > > Message #2: > > Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=peak.localnet) > by smarthost03a.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtps > (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) > (Exim 4.80) > (envelope-from <pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk>) > id 1eImhw-0002XH-8v > for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 02:30:12 +0000 > > Note the different host names and different IDs, these are two distinct > emails sent by you.
No, those are Exim's local IDs, assigned by the list server host. Those are distinct from RFc 5322 Message-IDs, which are the closest thing to uniquely identify a message. So from the above it cannot be concluded that Peter's system sent the message twice: it might have, but it might equally have been the fault of the list server. FWIW, I am _not_ seeing any duplicates on this list, but I am currently struggling with dupes on another one: http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs -- Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet, if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup. To reply privately _only_ on Usenet, fetch the TXT record for the domain.
