Re: [gentoo-user] no more googleearth in portage

2017-09-20 Thread Dale
Raffaele Belardi wrote: > I suppose it's due to Google's choice to support only Chrome, although I > missed the Gentoo > news bit if there was one. > > For Android there is the really good Open Street Map application, are there > any desktop > alternatives in Portage for non-Chrome users? I know

Re: [gentoo-user] no more googleearth in portage

2017-09-20 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 01:59:14 -0500, Dale wrote: > If it helps any, I still have it installed and I rescued the ebuild > folder.  I can send it to you if you want it, or anyone else, off list.  > Let me know if you or anyone else is interested.  It's version > 7.1.8.3036 but it works for me here. >

[gentoo-user] Sendmail confused by network change

2017-09-20 Thread Bas Zoutendijk
Dear Gentoo Users, On my new Gentoo laptop installation I recently installed Sendmail in order to receive messages from Cron on the root account. I noticed that when I connect my laptop to a different network than the one I connected to during booting, Sendmail does not know what to do with t

Re: [gentoo-user] Sendmail confused by network change

2017-09-20 Thread John Covici
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 05:45:07 -0400, Bas Zoutendijk wrote: > > Dear Gentoo Users, > > On my new Gentoo laptop installation I recently installed Sendmail in > order to receive messages from Cron on the root account. I noticed that > when I connect my laptop to a different network than the one I

Re: [gentoo-user] no more googleearth in portage

2017-09-20 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 09/20/2017 01:55 AM, Raffaele Belardi wrote: > I suppose it's due to Google's choice to support only Chrome https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624966

[gentoo-user] Re: Sendmail confused by network change

2017-09-20 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On 2017-09-20 11:45, Bas Zoutendijk wrote: > When I boot at home, Cron sends mail to root@hostname.homedomain. > ‘homedomain’ is automatically added to all host names on my home > network by the router. It can only be resolved inside the network; it > is not a registered domain name. I can recei

Re: [gentoo-user] Change Readline mode for all users?

2017-09-20 Thread Stroller
> On 19 Sep 2017, at 01:30, Simon Thelen wrote: > >> I find that my pager and editor are set in /etc/env.d/99pager and >> /etc/env.d/99editor respectively, but creating a >> /etc/env.d/99bashlineediting file containing "set -o vi" doesn't seem >> to work. > Either "set-editing-mode vi" in /etc/i

Re: [gentoo-user] Sendmail confused by network change

2017-09-20 Thread Bas Zoutendijk
Dear John, On Wed 20 Sep 2017 at 07:05:11 -0400, John Covici wrote: > Restarting sendmail seems fine with me, if you want to have something > that works everywhere, why not get a domain name from ddns or > somewhere and use a full fqdn all the time -- you can put your home > machine on another ho

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Sendmail confused by network change

2017-09-20 Thread Bas Zoutendijk
Dear Ian, On Wed 20 Sep 2017 at 08:23:33 -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > Despite being one of the retro/traditionalist guys on this list, I have > to say installing sendmail just for this purpose doesn't seem > proportionate. Even if you don't want to look into the smallish MTA > packages (nullmail

Re: [gentoo-user] Sendmail confused by network change

2017-09-20 Thread J. Roeleveld
On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 6:50:54 PM CEST Bas Zoutendijk wrote: > Dear John, > > On Wed 20 Sep 2017 at 07:05:11 -0400, John Covici wrote: > > Restarting sendmail seems fine with me, if you want to have something > > that works everywhere, why not get a domain name from ddns or > > somewhere

Re: [gentoo-user] Sendmail confused by network change

2017-09-20 Thread Bas Zoutendijk
On Wed 20 Sep 2017 at 19:02:52 +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote: > To clarify: > The IP-address determines how it is accessible. If the IP is not accessible > from the rest of the world, then you don't have to worry too much about > securing your mailserver. > > The domain name is only an address-book

Re: [gentoo-user] scary (?) situation with binutils

2017-09-20 Thread allan gottlieb
On Mon, Sep 18 2017, allan gottlieb wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18 2017, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > >> No need to do anything complicated. Just run >> >> emerge --depclean --ask >> >> and have it remove outdated binutils versions (it will keep the current one, >> and also then select it for usage auto

Re: [gentoo-user] no more googleearth in portage

2017-09-20 Thread John Campbell
On 09/19/2017 10:55 PM, Raffaele Belardi wrote: > I suppose it's due to Google's choice to support only Chrome, although I > missed the Gentoo > news bit if there was one. > > For Android there is the really good Open Street Map application, are there > any desktop > alternatives in Portage for

[gentoo-user] Multiple network interfaces and openrc

2017-09-20 Thread Ian Zimmerman
When I add multiple net.* services to a single runlevel (basic example: both a net.en* and a net.wl* service in default runlevel), it has a surprising and undesirable effect: when I bring one of them down by stopping the service, dnsmasq also gets stopped. It is as if openrc thinks dnsmasq "depend

Re: [gentoo-user] no more googleearth in portage

2017-09-20 Thread R0b0t1
On Wednesday, September 20, 2017, Raffaele Belardi wrote: > I suppose it's due to Google's choice to support only Chrome, although I missed the Gentoo > news bit if there was one. > I'm not sure that is right, see here: https://www.google.com/earth/ download/gep/agree.html. It looks like it is s

[gentoo-user] Re: Multiple network interfaces and openrc

2017-09-20 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2017-09-20, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > When I add multiple net.* services to a single runlevel (basic example: > both a net.en* and a net.wl* service in default runlevel), it has a > surprising and undesirable effect: when I bring one of them down by > stopping the service, dnsmasq also gets stopp

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Multiple network interfaces and openrc

2017-09-20 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 09/20/2017 04:28 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2017-09-20, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > >> When I add multiple net.* services to a single runlevel (basic example: >> both a net.en* and a net.wl* service in default runlevel), it has a >> surprising and undesirable effect: when I bring one of them dow