Hello Mick,
already tried, including uninstalling sys-kernel/linux-headers and than
reinstalling them... Installed version of linux-headers is 4.4 which is
the latest stable version.
Best regards
Jens
Am 25.01.2017 um 23:41 schrieb Mick:
> On Wednesday 25 Jan 2017 19:53:53 Jens Pelzetter wrote:
Hello list,
Today I have a block that I can't see a way out of.
[blocks B ] =dev-util/gdbus-codegen-2.32 required by (sys-fs/
udisks-2.1.8:2/2::gentoo, installed)
>=dev-util/gdbus-codegen-2.48 required by (x11-libs/gtk
+-3.22.5:3/3::gentoo, installed)
dev-util/gdbus-codegen required
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> Yeah, I've been using that directory for many many long years, I ended
>> up removing the grub directory completely and re-installing, it's much
>> cleaner now.
>
> You have done it wrong, actually :-P
>
> You are mounting the EFI partition as /boot. You should be mounti
On 26/01/2017 12:10, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Today I have a block that I can't see a way out of.
>
> [blocks B ] codegen-2.50.2" is blocking dev-libs/glib-2.50.2)
> [...]
> (dev-util/gdbus-codegen-2.48.2:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
> pulled in by
> dev-ut
Is it only me or have others the same issue.
I have lots of packages installed which are more recent then what is
currently in the tree, e.g.
dev-libs/gobject-introspection (installed here version 1.50.0 on
2016/11/25) but the most recent version in the tree is 1.48
Many thanks for your c
On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 15:31:55 +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Is it only me or have others the same issue.
> I have lots of packages installed which are more recent then what is
> currently in the tree, e.g.
>
> dev-libs/gobject-introspection (installed here version 1.50.0 on
> 2016/11/25) bu
(Sent via webmail while I continue wrestling with KMail...)
Alan McKinnon wrote :
> Does explicitly emerging gdbus-codegen-2.50.2 then re-running a world
> emerge give a different result?
peak ~ # emerj -1 =gdbus-codegen-2.50.2
Calculating dependencies ... done!
emerge: there are no ebuilds t
Hello all,
solved the problem. Looks like klibc does not build when distcc is
enabled. After disabling distcc klibc builds correctly.
Best regards
Jens
Am 25.01.2017 um 19:51 schrieb Jens Pelzetter:
> Hello all,
>
> on both of Gentoo systems dev-libs/klibc-2.0.4-r2 fails with the same
> error
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> (Sent via webmail while I continue wrestling with KMail...)
>
> Alan McKinnon wrote :
>
>> Does explicitly emerging gdbus-codegen-2.50.2 then re-running a world
>> emerge give a different result?
> peak ~ # emerj -1 =gdbus-codegen-2.50.2
> Calculating dependencies ... done
I looked for more information on GRUB form upstream but, on first
impression, it's been an abandoned project since 2012... Apparently some
users have posted patches to things like the invalid sector size problem
but the project has been deaf to these problems and has done nothing
whatsoever. =(
I
On 01/26/2017 09:35 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> (Sent via webmail while I continue wrestling with KMail...)
>
> Alan McKinnon wrote :
>
>> Does explicitly emerging gdbus-codegen-2.50.2 then re-running a world
>> emerge give a different result?
> peak ~ # emerj -1 =gdbus-codegen-2.50.2
> Calculati
Dale wrote :
> I'd try a fresh sync first. Maybe something went wrong during the last
> one?? Here is some info from mine:
Yes, that was my first thought, but I've sync'd several times in the last 24
hours so that isn't it.
> root@fireball / # equery l -p gobject-introspection
> * Searching
Corbin Bird wrote :
> If you would please, run this command and post the output ( a test in
> other words ).
>
> > emerge -pvt dev-util/gdbus-codegen:0
It wants to downgrade again, with the same output as I posted last time.
--
Regards,
Peter.
On 26 January 2017 at 18:03, Alan Grimes wrote:
> I looked for more information on GRUB form upstream but, on first
> impression, it's been an abandoned project since 2012... Apparently some
> users have posted patches to things like the invalid sector size problem
> but the project has been deaf
On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 12:03:24 -0500, Alan Grimes wrote:
> I looked for more information on GRUB form upstream but, on first
> impression, it's been an abandoned project since 2012...
That's legacy GRUB, not GRUB2.
But if you want an EFI bootloader, it is much simpler to use bootctl if
you use sys
On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 17:15:04 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > If you would please, run this command and post the output ( a test in
> > other words ).
> >
> > > emerge -pvt dev-util/gdbus-codegen:0
>
> It wants to downgrade again, with the same output as I posted last time.
The addition of
On 26/01/2017 17:35, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> (Sent via webmail while I continue wrestling with KMail...)
>
> Alan McKinnon wrote :
>
>> Does explicitly emerging gdbus-codegen-2.50.2 then re-running a world
>> emerge give a different result?
>
> peak ~ # emerj -1 =gdbus-codegen-2.50.2
> Calculat
On 26/01/2017 03:52, Dale wrote:
> taii...@gmx.com wrote:
>> On 01/25/2017 05:03 AM, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
>>
>>> The java 8u112 download that the latest oracle java pulls in requires an
>>> invasive questionnaire to create an Oracle account to enable the
>>> download.
>>>
>>> I was using iced-tea
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 26/01/2017 17:35, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> (Sent via webmail while I continue wrestling with KMail...)
>>
>> Alan McKinnon wrote :
>>
>>> Does explicitly emerging gdbus-codegen-2.50.2 then re-running a world
>>> emerge give a different result?
>> peak ~ # emerj -1 =gdbus-
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 26/01/2017 03:52, Dale wrote:
>> taii...@gmx.com wrote:
>>> On 01/25/2017 05:03 AM, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
>>>
The java 8u112 download that the latest oracle java pulls in requires an
invasive questionnaire to create an Oracle account to enable the
download.
On 01/26/2017 11:15 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Corbin Bird wrote :
>
>
>> If you would please, run this command and post the output ( a test in
>> other words ).
>>
>>> emerge -pvt dev-util/gdbus-codegen:0
> It wants to downgrade again, with the same output as I posted last time.
>
A package ver
My ordeal with grub continues.
I tried the bleeding edge GRUB, no change in behavior.
I realized that I had an additional source of information that I had
been neglecting. The boot fixer thumb drive I had in the back of the
mascheen was booting UEFI into a crappy bloating debian-ish thingy. It's
On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 17:07:03 -0500, Alan Grimes wrote:
> 4. Create MFT partition table.
MFT? Isn't that something to do with NTFS? You need a GPT partition table
if you want to boot with UEFI.
--
Neil Bothwick
deja vous - the act of forgetting someone's name /again/ despite being
introduced t
On 27/01/17 01:03, Alan Grimes wrote:
> I looked for more information on GRUB form upstream but, on first
> impression, it's been an abandoned project since 2012... Apparently some
> users have posted patches to things like the invalid sector size problem
> but the project has been deaf to these pr
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 17:07:03 -0500, Alan Grimes wrote:
>
>> 4. Create MFT partition table.
> MFT? Isn't that something to do with NTFS? You need a GPT partition table
> if you want to boot with UEFI.
>
yeah, my bad memory, it was MFT, as offered by gparted. I don't seem to
h
On 27/01/17 08:33, Alan Grimes wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 17:07:03 -0500, Alan Grimes wrote:
>>
>>> 4. Create MFT partition table.
>> MFT? Isn't that something to do with NTFS? You need a GPT partition table
>> if you want to boot with UEFI.
>>
>
> yeah, my bad memory, it
Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> On 27/01/17 08:33, Alan Grimes wrote:
>> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>> On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 17:07:03 -0500, Alan Grimes wrote:
>>>
4. Create MFT partition table.
>>> MFT? Isn't that something to do with NTFS? You need a GPT partition table
>>> if you want to boot with UEFI.
>
Syslinux family has been my go to boot loader
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017, 4:12 PM Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> On 27/01/17 01:03, Alan Grimes wrote:
> > I looked for more information on GRUB form upstream but, on first
> > impression, it's been an abandoned project since 2012... Apparently some
> > users h
On Thursday 26 Jan 2017 15:04:27 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 15:31:55 +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > Is it only me or have others the same issue.
> > I have lots of packages installed which are more recent then what is
> > currently in the tree, e.g.
> >
> > dev-libs/gobject-intr
On Thursday 26 Jan 2017 15:08:25 Dale wrote:
> That's my thinking as well. I recall not long ago that I caught a bad
> sync.. It was several days later that I was able to get a good one and
> even then, it required me to switch to another mirror. I think in my
> case, someone decided to shut do
Mick wrote:
> On Thursday 26 Jan 2017 15:08:25 Dale wrote:
>> That's my thinking as well. I recall not long ago that I caught a bad
>> sync.. It was several days later that I was able to get a good one
>> and even then, it required me to switch to another mirror. I think in
>> my case, someone deci
31 matches
Mail list logo
