walt writes:
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 23:39:01 +0100
> lee wrote:
>
>>
>> ...
>
>
>> Well, ok, the file is still locked.
>>
>> 'group-' looks like a backup, and 'group.lock' contains 10563, which
>> is the pid of groupadd. I'd think that's ok.
>>
>> So what all does it take to create a system
Alan McKinnon writes:
> On 23/11/2015 22:31, lee wrote:
>> Todd Goodman writes:
>>
>>> * Peter Humphrey [151123 07:15]:
On Monday 23 November 2015 12:11:36 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Monday 23 November 2015 12:29:42 lee wrote:
>> Neil Bothwick writes:
>>> Grepping .config pro
On 25/11/2015 13:30, lee wrote:
> walt writes:
>
>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 23:39:01 +0100
>> lee wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> ...
>>
>>
>>> Well, ok, the file is still locked.
>>>
>>> 'group-' looks like a backup, and 'group.lock' contains 10563, which
>>> is the pid of groupadd. I'd think that's ok.
>>>
>
On 24/11/2015 17:24, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Saturday 21 November 2015 09:59:18 I wrote:
>
>> I think I'll follow Alan's suggestion and head upstream.
>
> After some discussion with Miroslav Lichvar I've found a chrony.conf that
> works for me on my 32-bit 2-core Atom. This is it:
>
> pool p
On Wednesday 25 Nov 2015 07:11:39 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On 25 November 2015 00:33:57 CET, Adam Carter wrote:
> >It seems like modern browsers don't have the option to support old
> >crypto,
> >eg on firefox setting security.version.tls.min to 0 still blocks SSLv3.
> >What do you use to access old
I have exactly the same problem mentioned in this thread. I think something
changed and broke the authentication during an update. i found this message by
Googling and just joined the mail list to ask for help. I have done everything
mentioned in the thread, and here's where I'm at: (it worked f
On 11/25/2015 11:50 AM, Bill Damage wrote:
> I have exactly the same problem mentioned in this thread. I think something
> changed and broke the authentication during an update. i found this message
> by Googling and just joined the mail list to ask for help. I have done
> everything mentioned i
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:58:47 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> I had the same problem.
> openssh-7.xxx (screwed up) by disabling ssh-dss key (that is what
> nxserver is using).
That's not what the error message you posted said.
> Trying to enable the "ssh-dss" via sshd_config does not work!
On 11/25/2015 12:31 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:58:47 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
>> I had the same problem.
>> openssh-7.xxx (screwed up) by disabling ssh-dss key (that is what
>> nxserver is using).
>
> That's not what the error message you posted said.
>
>> Tr
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 12:55:43 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> > Which you would expect if that was not the problem. From memory, I
> > think your problem was caused by password logins as root being
> > disabled. That was another change for 7.0 and my only comment on that
> > is "why the hell
On Wednesday 25 Nov 2015 20:04:14 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 12:55:43 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> > > Which you would expect if that was not the problem. From memory, I
> > > think your problem was caused by password logins as root being
> > > disabled. That was another c
On 11/25/2015 01:04 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 12:55:43 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
>>> Which you would expect if that was not the problem. From memory, I
>>> think your problem was caused by password logins as root being
>>> disabled. That was another change for 7.0
I'll admit that my system setup is a bit unusual. A long time ago, in
a place far away, hard drives were small, compared to today's standards.
The usual unix practice of multiple seprate partitions was not feasable
for me, but I did want to keep root on its own partition. So I
compromised with
2015-11-25 16:10 GMT-06:00 :
> /dev/sda7. Here's the relevant portion of /etc/fstab...
...
> /home/bindmounts/opt/optauto bind 0 0
Why not use regular partiontions instand of bindmounts, you are just
doing weird stuff seems to me.
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 18:53:50 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 25/11/2015 13:30, lee wrote:
> > walt writes:
> >
> >> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 23:39:01 +0100
> >> lee wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> ...
> >>
> >>
> >> Any unusual network activity? (DNS lookups that shouldn't be
> >> happening, etc.)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 11/25/2015 05:10 PM, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
> I'll admit that my system setup is a bit unusual. A long time ago, in
> a place far away, hard drives were small, compared to today's standards.
> The usual unix practice of multiple seprate p
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Jc García wrote:
> 2015-11-25 16:10 GMT-06:00 :
>
>> /dev/sda7. Here's the relevant portion of /etc/fstab...
> ...
>
>> /home/bindmounts/opt/optauto bind 0 0
>
> Why not use regular partiontions instand of bindmounts, you are just
>
waltd...@waltdnes.org writes:
> I'll admit that my system setup is a bit unusual. A long time ago, in
> a place far away, hard drives were small, compared to today's standards.
> The usual unix practice of multiple seprate partitions was not feasable
> for me, but I did want to keep root on its
Alan McKinnon writes:
> On 25/11/2015 13:30, lee wrote:
>> walt writes:
>>
>>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 23:39:01 +0100
>>> lee wrote:
>>>
...
>>>
>>>
Well, ok, the file is still locked.
'group-' looks like a backup, and 'group.lock' contains 10563, which
is the pid o
On Nov 26, 2015 08:30, "lee" wrote:
> waltd...@waltdnes.org writes:
> > compromised with a small / partition, with empty /home, /opt, /var,
> > /usr, and /tmp directories. Their real equivalents are bind-mounted
> > from a much larger partition.
>
> Why don't you just mount the large partition so
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 07:15:44PM -0500, Jonathan Callen wrote
> Note that all the bind mounts show up with the exact same device name as
> the original mount they were bound off of. In the interest of not
> showing duplicate information, df will only show the mountpoint that has
> the shortest p
I'm getting a bunch of messages like...
> Subject: cron for user root root[ ! -x /etc/cron.hourly/0anacron ] &&
> { test -x /usr/sbin/run-crons && /usr/sbin/run-crons ; }
>
> /bin/sh: root: command not found
/bin/sh does exist...
[d531][waltdnes][~] ll /bin/sh
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4
>
> A less onerous method, but potentially more insecure unless you revert the
> setting for day to day usage, is to type 'about:config' and set
> security.tls.version.min to 0, before you restart FF.
>
>
Restarting doesnt help (with FF 42 at least). Message is "Firefox cannot
guarantee the safety
On Wednesday 25 November 2015 22:29:52 waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
> I'm getting a bunch of messages like...
>
>> Subject: cron for user root root[ ! -x /etc/cron.hourly/0anacron ]
>> && { test -x /usr/sbin/run-crons && /usr/sbin/run-crons ; }
>>
>> /bin/sh: root: command not found
>
>/b
Hi all, I'm not a developer but I would like to set up my Xen system to
get bug reports as useful as possible. At present I am logging the xen
console via serial port, and I am running Xen compiled from gentoo
ebuild with "debug" use flag. Is there anything more I need to set up to
be able to colle
On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 10:29:52 PM waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
> I'm getting a bunch of messages like...
>
> > Subject: cron for user root root[ ! -x /etc/cron.hourly/0anacron ]
> > && { test -x /usr/sbin/run-crons && /usr/sbin/run-crons ; }
> >
> > /bin/sh: root: command not
On 26/11/2015 02:03, walt wrote:
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 18:53:50 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 25/11/2015 13:30, lee wrote:
walt writes:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 23:39:01 +0100
lee wrote:
...
Any unusual network activity? (DNS lookups that shouldn't be
happening, etc.)
There's nothing
On 26/11/2015 01:33, lee wrote:
Alan McKinnon writes:
On 25/11/2015 13:30, lee wrote:
walt writes:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 23:39:01 +0100
lee wrote:
...
Well, ok, the file is still locked.
'group-' looks like a backup, and 'group.lock' contains 10563, which
is the pid of groupadd. I'
28 matches
Mail list logo
