Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.5.4 failed (install phase)

On 8 April 2013 02:13, Joseph wrote: > I'm getting an error re-compiling gcc-4.5.4 > > o _dim_i16.o _dim_r4.o _dim_r8.o _dim_r10.o _dim_r16.o _atan2_r4.o > _atan2_r8.o _atan2_r10.o _atan2_r16.o _mod_i4.o _mod_i8.o _mod_i16.o > _mod_r4.o _mod_r8.o _mod_r10.o _mod_r16.o misc_specifics.o dprod_r8.o >

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-libs/folks-0.4.3 fails to emerge

lapy andy # cat /var/lib/layman/make.conf PORTDIR_OVERLAY=" /var/lib/layman/gamerlay /var/lib/layman/games /var/lib/layman/java-overlay $PORTDIR_OVERLAY " I attached the other logs. I also remerged libgee no change Thanks, -Andy On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: > On Sun, A

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-libs/folks-0.4.3 fails to emerge

I also tried this: emerge gobject-introspection =dev-lang/vala-0.12.1-r1 dbus =dev-lang/vala-0.18.1 dbus-glib libgee telepathy-glib all of which merged successfully Folks still failed On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Andrew Hoffman wrote: > lapy andy # cat /var/lib/layman/make.conf > PORTDIR_OVER

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.5.4 failed (install phase)

Markos Chandras wrote: > On 8 April 2013 02:13, Joseph wrote: > > I'm getting an error re-compiling gcc-4.5.4 > > > > o _dim_i16.o _dim_r4.o _dim_r8.o _dim_r10.o _dim_r16.o _atan2_r4.o > > _atan2_r8.o _atan2_r10.o _atan2_r16.o _mod_i4.o _mod_i8.o _mod_i16.o > > _mod_r4.o _mod_r8.o _mod_r10.o _mo

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.5.4 failed (install phase)

On 04/08/13 09:47, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: Markos Chandras wrote: On 8 April 2013 02:13, Joseph wrote: > I'm getting an error re-compiling gcc-4.5.4 > > o _dim_i16.o _dim_r4.o _dim_r8.o _dim_r10.o _dim_r16.o _atan2_r4.o > _atan2_r8.o _atan2_r10.o _atan2_r16.o _mod_i4.o _mod_i8.o _mod_i16

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Udev update and persistent net rules changes

On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 03:09:43PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 10:25:50AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: > > On 2013-04-05 4:11 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 02:38:21PM -0500, Bruce Hill wrote: > > >> Just dealing with one server and my Linux router, the

[gentoo-user] Pidgin, gtalk and jingle

So, I'm trying to verify whether or not Pidgin can talk to Google Voice on my laptop. When searching around for instructions, I get the impression that this is supposed to "just work", and I don't see much in the way of people actually having difficulty with it. In my case, if someone calls me, my

Re: [gentoo-user] Pidgin, gtalk and jingle

Am 08.04.2013 17:20, schrieb Michael Mol: > So, I'm trying to verify whether or not Pidgin can talk to Google Voice > on my laptop. When searching around for instructions, I get the > impression that this is supposed to "just work", and I don't see much in > the way of people actually having diffic

Re: [gentoo-user] Pidgin, gtalk and jingle

On Apr 8, 2013 9:07 PM, "Michael Hampicke" wrote: > > Am 08.04.2013 17:20, schrieb Michael Mol: > > So, I'm trying to verify whether or not Pidgin can talk to Google Voice > > on my laptop. When searching around for instructions, I get the > > impression that this is supposed to "just work", and I

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Udev update and persistent net rules changes

On 04/08/2013 11:04 AM, Bruce Hill wrote: > On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 03:09:43PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 10:25:50AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: >>> On 2013-04-05 4:11 PM, William Hubbs wrote: On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 02:38:21PM -0500, Bruce Hill wrote: > Just deali

Re: [gentoo-user] Pidgin, gtalk and jingle

On 04/08/2013 11:39 AM, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: > On Apr 8, 2013 9:07 PM, "Michael Hampicke" > wrote: >> >> Am 08.04.2013 17:20, schrieb Michael Mol: >> > So, I'm trying to verify whether or not Pidgin can talk to Google Voice >> > on my laptop. When searching around

Re: [gentoo-user] Pidgin, gtalk and jingle

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Google voice uses ulaw g7.11 only if I remember rigbt Google talk/chat allows a few more but jingle isn't one of them. Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: >On Apr 8, 2013 9:07 PM, "Michael Hampicke" >wrote: >> >> Am 08.04.2013 17:20, schrieb Michael Mol:

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Udev update and persistent net rules changes

On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 03:09:43PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > > The significance is that the kernel determines the eth* name order. > Right now, you are lucky in that the order is what you think it should > be, but if something changes in the kernel causing your cards to be > initialized in a d

Re: [gentoo-user] Eth0 interface not found - udev that little slut!!!!!

On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 09:12:15AM +0800, William Kenworthy wrote: > > > > Steady on, old chap! By "it" I was meaning the general inconvenience > > all round occasioned by the changes between udev-{197,200}. Not > > everybody encountered this. For example Dale, and Walt D. didn't have > > to do

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Eth0 interface not found - udev that little slut!!!!!

On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 05:00:17PM +, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2013-04-07, Tanstaafl wrote: > > On 2013-04-07 6:55 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > >> On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 17:14:00 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: > >> > Well, in my case 80-net-names-slot.rules was neither empty, > nor symlink to

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Eth0 interface not found - udev that little slut!!!!!

On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 09:31:43PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 13:16:45 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: > > > "If /etc/udev/rules.d/80-net-name-slot.rules is an empty file or a > > symlink to /dev/null," > > > > The first can obviously be taken quite literally, while the second just

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Eth0 interface not found - udev that little slut!!!!!

On 04/08/2013 12:04 PM, Bruce Hill wrote: > On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 09:31:43PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: >> On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 13:16:45 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: >> >>> "If /etc/udev/rules.d/80-net-name-slot.rules is an empty file or a >>> symlink to /dev/null," >>> >>> The first can obviously be

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Eth0 interface not found - udev that little slut!!!!!

On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 07:42:23PM +0200, Michael Hampicke wrote: > > Mike is right, if it's not a dep of another ebuild, you don't need > wpa_supplicant. I just upgraded udev to 200 on the last remote box > (which is always a bit of a thrill after typing reboot :-) ). > As expected, eth0 came up

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Eth0 interface not found - udev that little slut!!!!!

On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 01:29:20PM -0400, Nick Khamis wrote: > After psyching myself and everyone else for the udev 200 update, it > failed on compile phase! We are using hardened server, and error > message (which I am transferring over manually) is: > > The specific snippet of code: >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Eth0 interface not found - udev that little slut!!!!!

On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 10:58:38PM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote: > On Sat, 6 Apr 2013 22:35:22 -0400 > Nick Khamis wrote: > > As for /sbin/ip. I have no such command. > > I'd recommend installing and becoming familiar with the iproute2 > package. I personally find the tools it delivers to be more in

Re: [gentoo-user] Eth0 interface not found - udev

On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 10:35:28PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote: > > AFAICT, on-board NICs have sequential MAC Adresses, with the one labeled > "Port 1" has the smallest MAC Address. So far, *all* Linux distros I've > used on a server will reliably name "Port X" as "eth$((X-1))". So it's > never a pu

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Eth0 interface not found - udev that little slut!!!!!

On 04/08/2013 12:28 PM, Bruce Hill wrote: > On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 10:58:38PM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote: >> On Sat, 6 Apr 2013 22:35:22 -0400 >> Nick Khamis wrote: >>> As for /sbin/ip. I have no such command. >> >> I'd recommend installing and becoming familiar with the iproute2 >> package. I per

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Eth0 interface not found - udev that little slut!!!!!

On 08-Apr-13 19:19, Michael Mol wrote: On 04/08/2013 12:28 PM, Bruce Hill wrote: On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 10:58:38PM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote: On Sat, 6 Apr 2013 22:35:22 -0400 Nick Khamis wrote: As for /sbin/ip. I have no such command. I'd recommend installing and becoming familiar with th

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-libs/folks-0.4.3 fails to emerge

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Andrew Hoffman wrote: > I also tried this: emerge gobject-introspection =dev-lang/vala-0.12.1-r1 > dbus =dev-lang/vala-0.18.1 dbus-glib libgee telepathy-glib > all of which merged successfully > Folks still failed Do you have the following files in your system? /u

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-libs/folks-0.4.3 fails to emerge

Canek, I have those files in /usr/lib/pkgconfig I do not have a /usr/lib64 lapy lib # locate telepathy-glib.pc /usr/lib/pkgconfig/telepathy-glib.pc lapy lib # locate dbus-glib-1.pc /usr/lib/pkgconfig/dbus-glib-1.pc lapy lib # locate gio-2.0.pc /usr/lib/pkgconfig/gio-2.0.pc lapy lib # locate gee-1.

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-libs/folks-0.4.3 fails to emerge

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Andrew Hoffman wrote: > Canek, > I have those files in /usr/lib/pkgconfig I do not have a /usr/lib64 > > lapy lib # locate telepathy-glib.pc > /usr/lib/pkgconfig/telepathy-glib.pc > lapy lib # locate dbus-glib-1.pc > /usr/lib/pkgconfig/dbus-glib-1.pc > lapy lib # l

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-libs/folks-0.4.3 fails to emerge

On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 08:19:23AM -0500, Andrew Hoffman wrote > I also tried this: emerge gobject-introspection =dev-lang/vala-0.12.1-r1 > dbus =dev-lang/vala-0.18.1 dbus-glib libgee telepathy-glib > all of which merged successfully > Folks still failed The python setup appears to be OK from yo

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-libs/folks-0.4.3 fails to emerge

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Andrew Hoffman > wrote: > > Canek, > > I have those files in /usr/lib/pkgconfig I do not have a /usr/lib64 > > > > lapy lib # locate telepathy-glib.pc > > /usr/lib/pkgconfig/telepathy-glib.pc > > lapy li

Re: [gentoo-user] Eth0 interface not found - udev

On 04/08/13 04:36, Stroller wrote: The new naming scheme, however, is much less intuitive. Where originally I just immediately use eth0, now I have to enumerate the monikers first, because even between servers of the same model (let's say, HP's DL360 G7), the PCI attachment point might diffe

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-libs/folks-0.4.3 fails to emerge

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Andrew Hoffman wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Andrew Hoffman >> wrote: >> > Canek, >> > I have those files in /usr/lib/pkgconfig I do not have a /usr/lib64 >> > >> > lapy lib # loc

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Eth0 interface not found - udev that little slut!!!!!

On Apr 9, 2013 12:32 AM, "Jarry" wrote: > > On 08-Apr-13 19:19, Michael Mol wrote: >> >> On 04/08/2013 12:28 PM, Bruce Hill wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 10:58:38PM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote: On Sat, 6 Apr 2013 22:35:22 -0400 Nick Khamis wrote: > > As for /sbin/ip.

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-libs/folks-0.4.3 fails to emerge

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Andrew Hoffman > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés > > wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Andrew Hoffman > >> wrote: > >> > Canek, > >> > I have t

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Eth0 interface not found - udev that little slut!!!!!

On Apr 8, 2013 11:17 PM, "Bruce Hill" wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 07:42:23PM +0200, Michael Hampicke wrote: > > > > Mike is right, if it's not a dep of another ebuild, you don't need > > wpa_supplicant. I just upgraded udev to 200 on the last remote box > > (which is always a bit of a thril

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-libs/folks-0.4.3 fails to emerge

On Sun, 2013-04-07 at 21:49 -0500, Andrew Hoffman wrote: > I have been able to resolve many issues by re-emerging mesa and > manualy listing the packages RR wants to emerge but i have now just > Folks left failing to emerge. I reported a bug about folks just last week: https://bugs.gentoo.org/sh

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-libs/folks-0.4.3 fails to emerge

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Andrew Hoffman wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Andrew Hoffman >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 8, 20

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-libs/folks-0.4.3 fails to emerge

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Andrew Hoffman wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Andrew Hoffman >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 8

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Eth0 interface not found - udev that little slut!!!!!

On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 09:40:41PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote: > > /sbin/ip link addr show > > That will tell you the names of your interfaces, as they currently exist. FWIW that command should be "ip addr show" rather than "ip link addr show", and no need for full path in later versions (forgetti

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-libs/folks-0.4.3 fails to emerge

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Andrew Hoffman > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés > > wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Andrew Hoffman < > andy.hoffma...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Eth0 interface not found - udev that little slut!!!!!

Am 08.04.2013 18:16, schrieb Bruce Hill: > On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 07:42:23PM +0200, Michael Hampicke wrote: >> >> Mike is right, if it's not a dep of another ebuild, you don't need >> wpa_supplicant. I just upgraded udev to 200 on the last remote box >> (which is always a bit of a thrill after typ

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Eth0 interface not found - udev that little slut!!!!!

On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 09:46:28PM +0200, Michael Hampicke wrote: > > I have something similar with grub (with grub set default, savedefault, > fallback). Also most machines have some sort of rescue access with like > ipmi serial over lan or a eric card (kvm). But some remote machines > don't and

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Eth0 interface not found - udev that little slut!!!!!

Am 08.04.2013 21:56, schrieb Bruce Hill: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 09:46:28PM +0200, Michael Hampicke wrote: >> >> I have something similar with grub (with grub set default, savedefault, >> fallback). Also most machines have some sort of rescue access with like >> ipmi serial over lan or a eric car

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Eth0 interface not found - udev that little slut!!!!!

On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 10:10:09PM +0200, Michael Hampicke wrote: > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > If you have the time, maybe you can post your GrUB setup and a short HOW-TO > > do > > this somewhere. I've often mentioned doing it with LiLO in #gentoo on > > Freenode > > and always get flamed by Gr

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Eth0 interface not found - udev that little slut!!!!!

On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 11:20:57 -0500, Bruce Hill wrote: > You might not care, but I automatically hit D (delete) in Mutt for > every email that's top-posted. Just saying... But not until after replying? :P -- Neil Bothwick Are Cheerios really doughnut seeds? signature.asc Description: PGP sign

Re: [gentoo-user] Eth0 interface not found - udev

On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 12:12:30 -0600, Joseph wrote: > If the boys with the servers, with more than two networks cards wants > to have consistent naming they should have made it optional and not > push this "new name crap" on everybody. It is optional - RTFN! -- Neil Bothwick Suicide is the most

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Eth0 interface not found - udev that little slut!!!!!

On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 11:11:08PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 11:20:57 -0500, Bruce Hill wrote: > > > You might not care, but I automatically hit D (delete) in Mutt for > > every email that's top-posted. Just saying... > > But not until after replying? :P Well, if I see whi

[gentoo-user] Rant/Warning: fun with awesome and lightdm

Hi list [ Writing this to a) vent frustration and (spoiler alert ;-) ) b) warn about a strange change in x11-wm/awesome (from upstream or Gentoo, I don't know). ] Well, I just finished debugging an issue that cropped up around mid-march that I didn't have time to track down properly, mostly bec

[gentoo-user] -march=? for this cpu

I have two Gentoo VMs at Hetzner and the CPU supports 64 bit (grep lm /proc/cpuinfo = true). But something funny, gcc -march=native -mtune=native -v -E - 2>&1 Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/4.6.3/gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/

Re: [gentoo-user] -march=? for this cpu

On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 09:20:00AM +0530, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote > I have two Gentoo VMs at Hetzner and the CPU supports 64 bit (grep lm > /proc/cpuinfo = true). Is "Hetzner" a remote hosting service? If so, ignore what I say below, and ask them if their VMs support 64 bits. The part below

Re: [gentoo-user] -march=? for this cpu

Am 09.04.2013 05:50, schrieb Nilesh Govindrajan: > I have two Gentoo VMs at Hetzner and the CPU supports 64 bit (grep lm > /proc/cpuinfo = true). > > But something funny, gcc -march=native -mtune=native -v -E - 2>&1 > > Using built-in specs. > COLLECT_GCC=/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/4.6.3/g