Hi, Gentoo users.
I'm new to this list, and also new to Gentoo and to Linux in general. Despite
that, I think my questions are reasonable ones. They have to do with the
Kaspersky Rescue Disk (KRD), which uses Gentoo, as you probably know.
I installed the KRD to a 4Gb USB flash drive, in order t
Hello again!
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 01:59:51 +0200
v...@ukr.net wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 21:52:41 +
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 23:47:58 +0200, v...@ukr.net wrote:
> >
> > > After a recent upgrade to LibreOffice 4.0.0.3 Impress refuses to
> > > impor
Am 10.02.2013 20:47, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
> Yep, had the same problem, solved with:
>
> LidSwitchIgnoreInhibited=no
>
> in /etc/systemd/logind.conf. Since then it has happened again maybe a
> couple of times (I have no idea why), but most of the time (and I'm
> talking above 99%), it wor
On Monday 11 Feb 2013 08:09:17 Michael Sondow wrote:
> Hi, Gentoo users.
>
> I'm new to this list, and also new to Gentoo and to Linux in general.
> Despite that, I think my questions are reasonable ones. They have to do
> with the Kaspersky Rescue Disk (KRD), which uses Gentoo, as you probably
>
On 2013-02-10 3:43 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 15:40:00 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
Here's what IUSE says are enabled for the currently installed lvm2:
readline +static +static-libs clvm cman +lvm1 selinux
IUSE shows the flags that were available to that build, USE shows the
fl
On 11/02/2013 14:09, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-02-10 3:43 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 15:40:00 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
>>
>>> Here's what IUSE says are enabled for the currently installed lvm2:
>>>
>>> readline +static +static-libs clvm cman +lvm1 selinux
>>
>> IUSE shows the
Am 07.02.2013 22:38, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
> For what is worth, you also don't need to specify neither /dev nor
> /proc in fstab with systemd. I'm not sure the init system has anything
> to do with it, though; I believe is udev work, so with a recent
> version of udev, no matter the init sy
On Monday 11 Feb 2013 15:38:28 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 07.02.2013 22:38, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
> > For what is worth, you also don't need to specify neither /dev nor
> > /proc in fstab with systemd. I'm not sure the init system has anything
> > to do with it, though; I believe is ud
walt gmail.com> writes:
> The only obvious problem I can see is that grub2 will need zfs support
> if your /boot is going to be zfs. I don't recall all of the details,
> but at one point during the grub2 install you can tell it to pre-load
> the zfs module (and any other modules you may want) d
Anyone given kicktoo a test drive?
If so, what did you think?
James
Mick wrote:
> I would think so. This is the only line that I have in mine and the system
> boots fine: # glibc 2.2
and above expects tmpfs to be mounted at /dev/shm for # POSIX shared
memory (shm_open, shm_unlink). # (tmpfs is a dynamically
expandable/shrinkable ramdisk, and will # use almost no m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2013 12:05 AM, Grant wrote:
>>> The responses all come back successfully within a few seconds.
>>> Can you give me a really general description of the sort of
>>> problem that could behave like this?
>>
>> Your server is just a single compu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2013 08:53 PM, Stroller wrote:
>
> On 10 February 2013, at 05:05, Grant wrote:
>>> ... Your server is just a single computer, running multiple
>>> processes. Each request from a user (be it you or someone else)
>>> requires a certain amount o
Am 11.02.2013 18:36, schrieb Dale:
> Mick wrote:
>> I would think so. This is the only line that I have in mine and the system
>> boots fine: # glibc 2.2
> and above expects tmpfs to be mounted at /dev/shm for # POSIX shared
> memory (shm_open, shm_unlink). # (tmpfs is a dynamically
> expandable/s
On 11/02/2013 19:43, Michael Mol wrote:
> Now that's a new (and important!) piece of information. Your server
> runs slow for 10 *minutes* after your script has made its request?
>
> To me, that indicates that important data wound up getting swapped to
> disk on the server, and the slow behavior r
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:51 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 10.02.2013 20:47, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>
>> Yep, had the same problem, solved with:
>>
>> LidSwitchIgnoreInhibited=no
>>
>> in /etc/systemd/logind.conf. Since then it has happened again maybe a
>> couple of times (I have no
Am 11.02.2013 22:03, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:51 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>> Do you have acpid installed/enabled? Anything aside the default
>> acpi-scripts?
>
> The last time I installed acpid was in November of 2010, and I
> uninstalled for the last time i
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 11.02.2013 22:03, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:51 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>>> Do you have acpid installed/enabled? Anything aside the default
>>> acpi-scripts?
>>
>> The last time I installed ac
Am 11.02.2013 22:30, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>> I see upower.service as active but disabled ... ? hmm..
>
> It's OK; disabled means that it's not enabled, i.e., there is no link
> to it from /etc/systemd/system/*.wants. It's Dbus
I tried doing an "emerge -auvND world" today. It's been three days
since the previous update, and today portage wants to update 1 package
and install _35_new_ones_.
Seriously? 35 new packages that I have to install on Monday that I
didn't have to have the previous Friday? A few of them are vir
Grant Edwards wrote:
>
> I tried doing an "emerge -auvND world" today. It's been three days
> since the previous update, and today portage wants to update 1 package
> and install _35_new_ones_.
>
> Seriously? 35 new packages that I have to install on Monday that I
> didn't have to have the previ
On 11/02/2013 23:55, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
> I tried doing an "emerge -auvND world" today. It's been three days
> since the previous update, and today portage wants to update 1 package
> and install _35_new_ones_.
>
> Seriously? 35 new packages that I have to install on Monday that I
> didn't
On 11 February 2013, at 17:43, Michael Mol wrote:
> ...
>> If so, I don't understand why apache2 seems to bog down a bit for
>> about 10 minutes afterward.
>
> Now that's a new (and important!) piece of information. Your server
> runs slow for 10 *minutes* after your script has made its request?
On 2013-02-11, Dale wrote:
> Grant Edwards wrote:
>>
>> I tried doing an "emerge -auvND world" today. It's been three days
>> since the previous update, and today portage wants to update 1 package
>> and install _35_new_ones_.
>>
>> Seriously? 35 new packages that I have to install on Monday th
On 2013-02-11, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 11/02/2013 23:55, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>
>> I tried doing an "emerge -auvND world" today. It's been three days
>> since the previous update, and today portage wants to update 1 package
>> and install _35_new_ones_.
>>
>> Seriously? 35 new packages that
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2013-02-11, Dale wrote:
>> Grant Edwards wrote:
>>>
>>> I tried doing an "emerge -auvND world" today. It's been three days
>>> since the previous update, and today portage wants to update 1 package
>>> and install _35_new_ones_.
>>>
>>> Seriously? 35 new packages that
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Dale wrote:
> Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2013-02-11, Dale wrote:
>>> Grant Edwards wrote:
I tried doing an "emerge -auvND world" today. It's been three days
since the previous update, and today portage wants to update 1 package
and install _3
Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Dale wrote:
>> Grant Edwards wrote:
>>> On 2013-02-11, Dale wrote:
Grant Edwards wrote:
>
> I tried doing an "emerge -auvND world" today. It's been three days
> since the previous update, and today portage wants to update 1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/11/2013 06:07 PM, Stroller wrote:
>
> On 11 February 2013, at 17:43, Michael Mol wrote:
>> ...
>>> If so, I don't understand why apache2 seems to bog down a bit
>>> for about 10 minutes afterward.
>>
>> Now that's a new (and important!) piece o
On Tuesday 12 February 2013 00:04:52 Michael Mol wrote:
> Primarily, what bothers me is your typically acerbic tone, and that
> your posts often (at least to my perception) carry more pejorative
> than useful information.
I've not noticed that, for what it's worth.
--
Peter
On Tuesday 12 February 2013 00:01:00 Dale wrote:
> This makes me think, if a Government suddenly decided for people to
> switch which side of the road they are supposed to drive on.
This happened in my lifetime in, I think, Sweden. I can't remember when
though.
--
Peter
On 12 February 2013, at 00:04, Michael Mol wrote:
>> I am sorry if I have caused you offence on any other occasion - if
>> so, please feel free to explain why.
>
> Primarily, what bothers me is your typically acerbic tone, and that
> your posts often (at least to my perception) carry more pejora
On 12 February 2013, at 00:30, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 February 2013 00:01:00 Dale wrote:
>
>> This makes me think, if a Government suddenly decided for people to
>> switch which side of the road they are supposed to drive on.
>
> This happened in my lifetime in, I think, Sweden. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/11/2013 08:05 PM, Stroller wrote:
>
> On 12 February 2013, at 00:04, Michael Mol wrote:
>>> I am sorry if I have caused you offence on any other occasion -
>>> if so, please feel free to explain why.
>>
>> Primarily, what bothers me is your typ
On 12 February 2013, at 01:19, Michael Mol wrote:
> ...
> I sincerely apologize. I will try to read your messages more clearly
> in the tone they're obviously intended. Perhaps I do have you confused
> with someone else. I hope so...either way, I apologize.
No problem, thank you and I'm glad we'r
I just got amazon prime for the instant videos (among other things) and
figured i should
be able to watch it on linux since its in flash.
However, I have had no luck getting it to play an instant video,
i've narrowed it down to videos with DRM, (because trailers play fine
and DRM screws up everythi
Hi there
Well I did reinstall my whole system but without luck.
Emerging gnome-light showed the very same error when
compiling spidermonkey.
Then I thought I will install awesome, because it does not
need spidermonkey. But the same problem here when compiling
awesome. `Illegal statement' in t
On 2013-02-12, Elias Diem wrote:
> `Illegal statement' in the build.log.
The above should read `Illegal instruction'.
--
Greetings
Elias
38 matches
Mail list logo
