[gentoo-user] Safe to install libpng-1.2.44?

2010-07-02 Thread Graham Murray
After an emerge --sync on an ~x86 system, the upgrade to opera-10.60 wants to install libpng-1.2.44 in a new slot. Considering all of the problems surrounding the upgrade to libpng-1.4.3, is it safe to let portage install libpng-1.2.44?

Re: [gentoo-user] Can we please get a USB-stick install boot image?

2010-07-02 Thread waltdnes
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 07:56:31PM -0300, Cr??stian Viana wrote > use UNetbootin (http://unetbootin.sf.net) to create a bootable USB stick. According to http://unetbootin.sourceforge.net/#other > The Linux version is compiled using g++, while the Windows version > is cross-compiled using mingw3

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Flash stopped working after Firefox 3.6.3->3.6.4 update.

2010-07-02 Thread netfab
Le Thu, 1 Jul 2010 21:05:37 -0700, Grant a écrit : > > I did have an extra libflashplayer.so, I deleted it, I deleted > pluginreg.dat, I re-emerged adobe-flash, and I restarted firefox, but > flash still isn't working. It works in opera. Any ideas? > Try with another new profile : $ f

Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-02 Thread Mihamina Rakotomandimby
> Nicolas Sebrecht : >It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" If the replier-to-all thinks of removing unwanted recipients, yes. But most of the time, people "reply-to-really-all" and that annoys. Among that, when replying-to-all, messages "To:" the mailing list are "List-id"/"X-Mail

Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-02 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Friday 02 July 2010 02:54:33 Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing > the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing lists I > use don't do that. > > It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" polic

Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-02 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 02:54:33 +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" policy as it permit > to be notified of an answer without having to track the whole mailing > list. If I post to the list, I expect a reply via the list. Getting two replies is annoyin

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Patch via perl script in an ebuild?

2010-07-02 Thread David Abbott
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Grant wrote: > [snip] > >> # Copyright 1999-2010 Gentoo Foundation >> # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 >> # $Header: $ >> >> EAPI="3" >> >> inherit perl-module >> >> DESCRIPTION="SOAP-WSDL provides a SOAP client with WSDL support."

Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-02 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Friday 02 July 2010 10:14:38 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 02:54:33 +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > > It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" policy as it permit > > to be notified of an answer without having to track the whole mailing > > list. > > If I post to the lis

[gentoo-user] Re: Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-02 Thread Nuno J. Silva
Dale writes: > Grant Edwards wrote: >> On 2010-07-02, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: >> >> >>> I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing >>> the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing >>> lists I use don't do that. >>> >>> It is usually better and p

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-02 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Friday 02 July 2010 12:01:09 Nuno J. Silva wrote: > Dale writes: > > Grant Edwards wrote: > >> On 2010-07-02, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > >>> I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing > >>> the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing > >>> lists I

[gentoo-user] Re: Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-02 Thread Nuno J. Silva
Alan McKinnon writes: > On Friday 02 July 2010 12:01:09 Nuno J. Silva wrote: >> Is there a way for someone to add another address to Reply-To? (Does the >> list management software overwrite the header or just appends its >> address?) >> >> Such a way would suit the OP and people who don't want

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-02 Thread Dale
Nuno J. Silva wrote: Alan McKinnon writes: On Friday 02 July 2010 12:01:09 Nuno J. Silva wrote: Is there a way for someone to add another address to Reply-To? (Does the list management software overwrite the header or just appends its address?) Such a way would suit the OP and

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-02 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Friday 02 July 2010 12:38:05 Nuno J. Silva wrote: > Or is Nicolas looking to reply to everyone when he writes? That would be > bad, as there are people who prefer to receive messages through the > list or using NNTP. I think Nicolas is seeking to get mail to do something it was not designed to

Re: [gentoo-user] Compilation error: pygtk (libpng)

2010-07-02 Thread Stroller
On 2 Jul 2010, at 02:35, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: after updateing libpng I run revdep-rebuild, which said pygtk have to rebuild (beside others). The compilation of pygtk breaks with: Could not write function get_option_group: No ArgType for GOptionGroup* Could not write function settings_i

Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-02 Thread Willie Wong
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 02:54:33AM +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing > the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing lists I > use don't do that. > > It is usually better and prefer the "answer to

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Patch via perl script in an ebuild?

2010-07-02 Thread Arttu V.
On 7/2/10, Grant wrote: > David, you mentioned in the bug that you couldn't get the patch to > work clean. I thought you got it working before when you posted the > patched Typemap for me to download. Did it work then but not now? > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=305621 Ah, I didn't k

Re: [gentoo-user] Compilation error: pygtk

2010-07-02 Thread Bill Longman
On 07/01/2010 06:35 PM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > * Call stack: > * ebuild.sh, line 54: Called src_compile > * environment, line 5365: Called python_src_compile > * environment, line 5150: Called python_execute_function '-d' '-s' '--' > * environment, line 4058: Called die >

Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-02 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2010-07-01 8:54 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing > the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing lists I > use don't do that. > > It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" policy -10 this is plain w

[gentoo-user] Re: qemu-kvm setup questions

2010-07-02 Thread walt
On 07/01/2010 08:53 PM, walt wrote: The big advantage of virtualbox is their creation of the "guest-additions" that allow for trivially easy sharing of files on the host machine with the guest machine. The catch is that the virtualbox "guest additions" are custom-built for each individual guest

[gentoo-user] Re: Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-02 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2010-07-02, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Friday 02 July 2010 12:01:09 Nuno J. Silva wrote: >> Dale writes: >> > Grant Edwards wrote: >> >> On 2010-07-02, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: >> >>> I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing >> >>> the 'Reply-To' header to the maili

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: governors (was: Is cpufrequtils needed these days?)

2010-07-02 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Freitag 02 Juli 2010, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 07:52:02PM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > On Sonntag 28 Februar 2010, Mick wrote: > > > or is the kernel itself clever enough to manage the hardware directly > > > these days? > > > > yes, it is. Just use the ondema

Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-02 Thread Kevin O'Gorman
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 02:54:33 +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > > > It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" policy as it permit > > to be notified of an answer without having to track the whole mailing > > list. > > If I post to the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Patch via perl script in an ebuild?

2010-07-02 Thread David Abbott
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Arttu V. wrote: > On 7/2/10, Grant wrote: >> David, you mentioned in the bug that you couldn't get the patch to >> work clean.  I thought you got it working before when you posted the >> patched Typemap for me to download.  Did it work then but not now? >> >> http:

Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-02 Thread Paul Hartman
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote: > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: >> If I post to the list, I expect a reply via the list. Getting two replies >> is annoying, especially if I don't realise the private one is a duplicate >> and reply to it before checking

Re: [gentoo-user] Can we please get a USB-stick install boot image?

2010-07-02 Thread Keith Dart
=== On Wed, 06/30, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: === > able to modify a CD boot image get Gentoo to boot from a > USB stick. === I have done that. Here's basically what I did. #!/bin/sh ISO=/home/ftp/pub/install/install-amd64-minimal-20081213.iso mkdosfs -F 32 /dev/sdc1 dd if=/usr/share/syslinux

[gentoo-user] postgresql-base-9.0_beta2-r1 and thread safety

2010-07-02 Thread kelly hirai
i'm getting the following compile error when emerging postgresql-base-9.0_beta2-r1: checking thread safety of required library functions... no configure: error: thread test program failed This platform is not thread-safe. Check the file 'config.log' or compile and run src/test/thread/thread_test

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-02 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 14:19:36 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote: > Not really. The OP's choice of mail client isn't going to change what > happens when people reply to his postings. He wants "reply-to" to > contain his address as well as the list address so that he gets a > direct response and does

Re: [gentoo-user] Safe to install libpng-1.2.44?

2010-07-02 Thread Keith Dart
=== On Fri, 07/02, Graham Murray wrote: === > After an emerge --sync on an ~x86 system, the upgrade to opera-10.60 > wants to install libpng-1.2.44 in a new slot. Considering all of the > problems surrounding the upgrade to libpng-1.4.3, is it safe to let > portage install libpng-1.2.44? === Yes

Re: [gentoo-user] Safe to install libpng-1.2.44?

2010-07-02 Thread Dale
Keith Dart wrote: === On Fri, 07/02, Graham Murray wrote: === After an emerge --sync on an ~x86 system, the upgrade to opera-10.60 wants to install libpng-1.2.44 in a new slot. Considering all of the problems surrounding the upgrade to libpng-1.4.3, is it safe to let portage install libpng-

Re: [gentoo-user] Safe to install libpng-1.2.44?

2010-07-02 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 17:49:30 -0500, Dale wrote: > This appears to be the opposite of a upgrade. He has a package that > wants the OLD slotted version of libpng not the NEW slotted version. > If I understand that correctly, he has already done the upgrade but now > something needs the old packag

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Patch via perl script in an ebuild?

2010-07-02 Thread Grant
>> David, you mentioned in the bug that you couldn't get the patch to >> work clean.  I thought you got it working before when you posted the >> patched Typemap for me to download.  Did it work then but not now? >> >> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=305621 >> >> - GrantSOAP-WSDL >> >> > The

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Patch via perl script in an ebuild?

2010-07-02 Thread Grant
>> David, you mentioned in the bug that you couldn't get the patch to >> work clean.  I thought you got it working before when you posted the >> patched Typemap for me to download.  Did it work then but not now? >> >> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=305621 > > Ah, I didn't know you had this

Re: [gentoo-user] Safe to install libpng-1.2.44?

2010-07-02 Thread Keith Dart
=== On Fri, 07/02, Dale wrote: === > This appears to be the opposite of a upgrade. He has a package that > wants the OLD slotted version of libpng not the NEW slotted version. > If I understand that correctly, he has already done the upgrade but > now something needs the old package installed in

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Patch via perl script in an ebuild?

2010-07-02 Thread David Abbott
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Grant wrote: >>> David, you mentioned in the bug that you couldn't get the patch to >>> work clean.  I thought you got it working before when you posted the >>> patched Typemap for me to download.  Did it work then but not now? >>> >>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bu

Re: [gentoo-user] who wants to downgrade my gcc ?

2010-07-02 Thread Dale
Neil Bothwick wrote: On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 09:22:56 -0500, Dale wrote: @world includes @system. But the problem is not that emerge world is skipping it but that it wants to downgrade gcc:4.4. From my understanding, world includes @system but @world does not. I know here on my ri

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Patch via perl script in an ebuild?

2010-07-02 Thread Grant
>>> David, you mentioned in the bug that you couldn't get the patch to >>> work clean.  I thought you got it working before when you posted the >>> patched Typemap for me to download.  Did it work then but not now? >>> >>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=305621 >> >> Ah, I didn't know you ha

Re: [gentoo-user] Samba freakiness; why isn't it reading MY /etc/samba/smb.conf file?

2010-07-02 Thread Greg Fitzgerald
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 04:44:58 -0500, Michael Sullivan wrote: > I just rebooted the computer to make sure this wasn't some weird RAM > remnant, but the computer booted up: > > carter ~ # /etc/init.d/samba status > * status: started > carter ~ # cat /etc/samba/smb.conf > [global] > workgroup =

[gentoo-user] Re: Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-02 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2010-07-02, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 14:19:36 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote: > >> Not really. The OP's choice of mail client isn't going to change >> what happens when people reply to his postings. He wants "reply-to" >> to contain his address as well as the list address s

[gentoo-user] Mounting micro SD cards

2010-07-02 Thread felix
I want a bigger micro SD card in my cell phone it came with just 2GB), so I bought a 16GB one complete with carrier to fit in a standard SD slot. My plan was to turn off the phone, remove the 2GB micro SD card, make a tarball of what is on there, put in the 16GB one and untar things, and put the 1

Re: [gentoo-user] Safe to install libpng-1.2.44?

2010-07-02 Thread Graham Murray
Dale writes: > This appears to be the opposite of a upgrade. He has a package that > wants the OLD slotted version of libpng not the NEW slotted version. > If I understand that correctly, he has already done the upgrade but > now something needs the old package installed in addition to the new >