>>> David, you mentioned in the bug that you couldn't get the patch to >>> work clean. I thought you got it working before when you posted the >>> patched Typemap for me to download. Did it work then but not now? >>> >>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=305621 >> >> Ah, I didn't know you had this already mostly figured out in a bug. >> Full disclosure requested -- from the very beginning! :D >> >> After taking a quick peek: do those ebuilds succeed in installing >> something? Since they don't follow CPAN conventions (esp. wrt naming) >> I'm not sure what perl-module.eclass actually does for their >> src_compile, src_install and other steps. Also, the "->" used in SRC >> might have interesting side-effects to paths, as the tarball name no >> longer matches its content directory's name. >> >> -- >> Arttu V. -- Running Gentoo is like running with scissors >> >> > I don't think I will use the software, I was just helping to put the > pieces together, Grant has been testing it as we move forward. Once we > get the pieces together and if it will work as intended I think we > could contact upstream to help with a more sensible approach to > packaging the patch for the stock SOAP-WSDL, so updating will be > easier to maintain. > Just my 2c :) > > > -- > David Abbott (dabbott)
You think Google will change the way it packages the SOAP-WSDL patch if we request it? - Grant
