On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 03:20:50AM +0100, Kerin Millar wrote:
> On 10/04/2010 23:06, luis jure wrote:
> >
> > hello list,
> >
> > after many years without a hardware upgrade, i'll be receiving my new
> > computer next week: intel i7 920 cpu, 6 GB ram, asus p6t mobo.
> >
> > i'm pretty excited, i im
On 2010-04-10 10:26 PM, Kerin Millar wrote:
> On 10/04/2010 23:17, Tanstaafl wrote:
>> This is on a server box, and I am *not* doing NAT on it...
>>
>> Do I even need the nat table? If not, I'd like to build the kernel
>> without NAT support, but if there's a good reason not to do that, I
>> won't.
On Sunday 11 April 2010 11:43:26 zeera...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 03:20:50AM +0100, Kerin Millar wrote:
> > On 10/04/2010 23:06, luis jure wrote:
> > > hello list,
> > >
> > > after many years without a hardware upgrade, i'll be receiving my new
> > > computer next week: intel i7
On 11/04/2010 11:43, zeera...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
In short, use "native" and let the compiler take care of the details.
Cheers,
--Kerin
There's a thread in Installing Gentoo where a dev (can't remember which), that
says native isn't the best option, but the best option indeed is to s
On 11/04/2010 12:27, Mick wrote:
On Sunday 11 April 2010 11:43:26 zeera...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 03:20:50AM +0100, Kerin Millar wrote:
On 10/04/2010 23:06, luis jure wrote:
hello list,
after many years without a hardware upgrade, i'll be receiving my new
computer next week:
Tanstaafl writes:
> I'm a bit clueless when it comes to firewalls, and have no idea what
> these numbers mean/do:
>
> *raw
> :PREROUTING ACCEPT [4911:886011]
> :OUTPUT ACCEPT [4546:2818732]
> COMMIT
The numbers are [packets:bytes] which match the rule or table
concerned.
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Kerin Millar wrote:
>
> $ paste <(cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cache/index?/type) <(cat
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cache/index?/size) | sed -re 's/\W+/: /'
>
> On my system that results in the following:
>
> Data: 32K
> Instruction: 32K
> Unified: 6144K
>
On Sunday 11 April 2010 14:12:08 Kerin Millar wrote:
> On 11/04/2010 12:27, Mick wrote:
> > On Sunday 11 April 2010 11:43:26 zeera...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 03:20:50AM +0100, Kerin Millar wrote:
> >>> On 10/04/2010 23:06, luis jure wrote:
> hello list,
>
> afte
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 11:57:32AM -0400, AJ Spagnoletti wrote:
> This is a late reply and you might have already solved the issue,
> however, I was running into this problem as well, and it was resolved
> for my by backing my X packages back down to stable as I was running a
> stable kernel. Anoth
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 01:21:01AM +0700, Ngoc Nguyen Bao wrote:
> Seems that you also suffer problem with Intel driver and kernel
> 2.6.32. Upgrade your xf86-video-intel to v2.11.0 may help.
Actually, I am still on kernel 2.6.30; with .32 something's not quite
right with the KMS and on boot my la
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Willie Wong wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 01:21:01AM +0700, Ngoc Nguyen Bao wrote:
>> Seems that you also suffer problem with Intel driver and kernel
>> 2.6.32. Upgrade your xf86-video-intel to v2.11.0 may help.
>
> Actually, I am still on kernel 2.6.30; with .3
Hi,
is there any application beside kaffeine to receive EPG text data
in a human readable form?
I am using vlc to look DVB-T...
Thank you very much in advance for any help!
Best regards,
mcc
--
Please don't send me any Word- or Powerpoint-Attachments
unless it's absolutely neccessary. - Send
I'm following the steps/script in
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Custom_Stage4 for making a custom Stage4.
Though I haven't tried installing it, the make script seems to work
since it build a stage4.tar.bz2 that's 21 Gigs.
Before I use it I was wondering what directories I can exclude to make
it
Hello,
I've been using the gentoo stable branch since I began with this distro
(around 4 years ago), but lately I've been unmasking almost all packages
I use in my daily work (emacs, firefox, gnome*, xmonad, etc).
The reason for doing so is that what is considered as unstable as been
regarded as
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 13:45:09 -0400, dhk wrote:
> For example open office is almost 10 Gigs,
How did that happen? It's around 290MB here, and that's before
compression. The package built when I installed it is 120MB.
> I would like to exclude that
> and just about everything else I installed over
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:36:37 +0200, Damian wrote:
> The reason for doing so is that what is considered as unstable as been
> regarded as stable releases for the developers, and the truth is that
> the problems I got for using outdated software were more that the ones I
> had for using unstable ver
On Sunday 11 April 2010 20:36:37 Damian wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been using the gentoo stable branch since I began with this distro
> (around 4 years ago), but lately I've been unmasking almost all packages
> I use in my daily work (emacs, firefox, gnome*, xmonad, etc).
>
> The reason for doing s
On 04/11/2010 03:39 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 13:45:09 -0400, dhk wrote:
>
>> For example open office is almost 10 Gigs,
>
> How did that happen? It's around 290MB here, and that's before
> compression. The package built when I installed it is 120MB.
>
>> I would like to exc
Damian writes:
> Thus, I'm thinking about switching all of my system to the unstable
> branch. But first I want to be sure that this is reasonable given the
> problems I described before.
>
> Can you provide me some useful advice according to your experience?
I have asked a similar question here
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:36:37 +0200, Damian wrote:
>
>> The reason for doing so is that what is considered as unstable as been
>> regarded as stable releases for the developers, and the truth is that
>> the problems I got for using outdated s
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:36:37 +0200, Damian wrote:
>>
>>> The reason for doing so is that what is considered as unstable as been
>>> regarded as stable releases for the developers, and t
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:24:18 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> I have a new machine that just came up yesterday. I was thinking of
> running ~arch on it and seeing how things work out. Seems like it's a
> good time to do it if I'm ever going to as I haven't started using it
> and it's going to get busy.
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:59:07 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> 1) I don't see any mention of hald & dbus in the upgrade guide. I
> currently have them turned on. Are they still necessary? I know hald
> is going away one of these days. Is it too early for me to dump it.
> Possibly dump hald before the up
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:20:39 -0400, dhk wrote:
> Doing the stage 3 as you suggested sounds good, but how can I ensure the
> same configuration. I would need to make sure I don't loose any
> customization like users, domainname, hostname, desktops, timezone, run
> level programs, bookmarks, .bash_
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:59:07 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>> 1) I don't see any mention of hald & dbus in the upgrade guide. I
>> currently have them turned on. Are they still necessary? I know hald
>> is going away one of these days. Is it to
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:11:53 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > Doing system first makes good sense. Then you can update your config
> > files, follow the openrc update etc and then reboot. The world part of
> > the update will take quite a while, especially if you use KDE or
> > GNOME.
>
> Less tha
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:11:53 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>> > Doing system first makes good sense. Then you can update your config
>> > files, follow the openrc update etc and then reboot. The world part of
>> > the update will take quite a w
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> A couple of packages in this OpenRC upgrade aren't building. I hope
> they are less important. So far groff and help2man have failed so I
> did --resume --skip-first and moved on for now.
>
So it's done and I'm editing. In /etc/init.d I se
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>>
>> A couple of packages in this OpenRC upgrade aren't building. I hope
>> they are less important. So far groff and help2man have failed so I
>> did --resume --skip-first and moved on f
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Dale wrote:
>
> On the screen that usually shows the progress, it says "Fatal error at
> startup: No space left on device." The main screen where I select files
> shows there is space left. It shows about 1Mb or so left.
Do you have enough free space in /tmp to
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> So help2man won't build due to some missing perl module.
>
> I'm assuming this isn't bad enough to stop a reboot from being
> successful but @system is @system so no reboot until I hear something
> back. (Or I get bored waiting...) ;-)
>
> Che
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Dale wrote:
On the screen that usually shows the progress, it says "Fatal error at
startup: No space left on device." The main screen where I select files
shows there is space left. It shows about 1Mb or so left.
Do you have enou
32 matches
Mail list logo
