On Wednesday 23 August 2006 07:28, Thomas Kear wrote:
> The real advantage that initng posesses are, unless runit's website
> is simply failing to mention it, auto-restarting of failed daemons,
> virtual dependencies, and clever multi-distro compatible scripts that
> use a preprocessor at install
060822 Scott Lampert wrote:
> Philip Webb wrote:
>> 060822 Lindsay Haisley wrote:
>>> Is this list up and running?
>>> I haven't received any traffic from it since Aug. 10.
>>> Lindsay Haisley | "Fighting against human | PGP public key
>>> FMP Computer Services |creativity is like |
On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 20:36 +0200, Adrian Frith wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 16:12 +0200, Alan Mckinnon wrote:
> > modify CFLAGS in /etc/make.conf
> > emerge -e system
> > emerge -s world
> >
> > This will rebuild your toolchain (gcc, glibc and friends) to use -O2
> > then rebuild the entire sys
On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 11:40 -0700, Richard Fish wrote:
> On 8/22/06, Alan Mckinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Your current compiler was built with -O3, and you want to rebuild the
> > system using a compiler compiled as -O2, hence the 2 step process.
>
> *Sigh*. I am so tired of this complete
Hi all
I am searching for a client for the 802.1x protocol,
performing basic authentication?
Something like
http://hostap.epitest.fi/wpa_supplicant/
but not limited to wireless networks.
Thanks a lot
Valerio Daelli
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 09:43, Alan Mckinnon wrote:
> I believe the gcc ebuild does do a bootstrap compile, which does imply
> that emerge -e system is redundant.
>
> But, we had a huge long rambling thread on this point recently which I'd
> rather not rehash again :-) and IIRC the general cons
... I cnt make a diff. It is the same file. Or say it this way:
I use to save the configurationto a different file during menuconfig. I
took THIS file to configure the vanilla sources.
IMHO
$ diff INITIAL INITIAL
wouldn't produce any output. ;o)))
Regards
Frank
On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 10:57 +0200,
Valerio daelli wrote:
I am searching for a client for the 802.1x protocol,
performing basic authentication?
Something like
http://hostap.epitest.fi/wpa_supplicant/
but not limited to wireless networks.
Hi Valerio,
I think you'll find the above program does work on wired networks -
check the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Does anyone know why the OptusC1-156E file that comes with dvbscan
doesn't match what's defined on lyngsat.com? For example Fox Sports 1
(sid 3001) is listed on lyngsat as 12478 H, SR 27800, 3/4 but in
channels.conf it is 12398:h:0:27800:1011:1012:3001
Hi,
does any of the Gentoo kernel sources in Portage contain the nfs-ngroups patch
(http://www.frankvm.com/nfs-ngroups/)?
I'm looking for an easily maintainable solution to bypass the NFS limitation of
16 groups per user.
Thanks,
Robert
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi,
since rebuilding my system to a stable one using the 2006.0 live CD
there are most of the icons in Evolution missing. They are replaced by
this "Broken picture" symbol or just empty (see the attachement).
Should I file a bug?
I could take them from the live CD and copy them to the proper loc
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 13:29 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 August 2006 09:43, Alan Mckinnon wrote:
> > I believe the gcc ebuild does do a bootstrap compile, which does imply
> > that emerge -e system is redundant.
> >
> > But, we had a huge long rambling thread on this point rec
Hi Frank, look this http://gentoo-wiki.com/Ethereal
Saludos
Fernando Ferrari
http://fernandorferrari.blogspot.com
-Mensaje original-
De: sdoma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: Miércoles, 23 de Agosto de 2006 11:03 a.m.
Para: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Asunto: [gentoo-user] Ethere
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 10:03, sdoma wrote:
> Any suggestions?
The project moved to the name wireshark, try that instead.
--
99% of politicians make the rest look bad.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
It's been renamed as Wireshark.
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 11:28 -0300, Fernando Ferrari wrote:
> Hi Frank, look this http://gentoo-wiki.com/Ethereal
>
> Saludos
> Fernando Ferrari
> http://fernandorferrari.blogspot.com
>
>
> -Mensaje original-
> De: sdoma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviad
I'm trying to figure out how to do this sequence in this bash script.
The problem I'm having is how to make $i to change according to the
changes in $x
My current solution is a bit of a hack and stupid.
One more thing, my current solution will parse the file _each_ time for
_each_value/head which
Hi,
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:58:01 +1200 "Thomas Kear"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having just had a quick look at runit, it appears we have the larger
> collection of init scripts, however being simple bash scripts it could
> be expected that runit's are slightly easier to make.
Runit does *not*
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 16:30, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> if [ "$x" -eq 0 ]
> then
> for i in `seq 1 7` <-
> do
> tpiert=`egrep -i "(average)" $1 | awk -v pat="$i"
> '{ if(NR==pat) print $5","$10}'`
> echo $filename,
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 16:03 +0200, sdoma wrote:
> Any suggestions?
Ethereal has been renamed Wireshark.
--
Keith Kastorff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
thanks for helping...the problem has been solved by applying iptable rules on my ppp0 instead of eth0. since ppp0 is the real device that conncts to the Internet.tks again.daniel
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 16:30, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> (Does awk parse the file once or multiple times, that is if I were to
> rewrite the below entirely in awk language)
awk parses the file only once. One line at a time. Of course that goes for
every invocation of awk... ;)
> finaltpi=`cat
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 17:17 +0200, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 August 2006 16:30, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
>
> > if [ "$x" -eq 0 ]
> >then
> >for i in `seq 1 7` <-
> > do
> > tpiert=`egrep -i "(average)" $1 | awk -v pat="$i"
> > '{
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:28:50 -0300
Fernando Ferrari wrote:
Hi,
> Hi Frank, look this http://gentoo-wiki.com/Ethereal
few days (or weeks) ago I asked for same thing to list. I installed
wireshark and, as it did not work, I forgot about it.
Now, after reading mini how-to, I found I have no wiresah
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 17:20 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 August 2006 16:30, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> > (Does awk parse the file once or multiple times, that is if I were to
> > rewrite the below entirely in awk language)
>
> awk parses the file only once. One line at a time. Of c
I am trying to write a scrip to maintain my Bind zone files and I was
wondering if it is valid to cram the SOA all onto one line. I have
scoured the internet and can't find anyone who does it that way. My
question is... will it break stuff? Right now my SOA looks like:
@ IN SOA ns1
Hello,
I updated my remote server to the latest baselayout this morning. I
received an elog mail about /etc/conf.d/net containing deprecated
config so I updated that according to net.example. Then I rebooted
and now there is no response from the server when I try to connect
over the Internet.
Michael Crute wrote:
I am trying to write a scrip to maintain my Bind zone files and I was
wondering if it is valid to cram the SOA all onto one line. I have
scoured the internet and can't find anyone who does it that way. My
question is... will it break stuff? Right now my SOA looks like:
@
On 8/23/06, sdoma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks, this was it. Where did you find this info? Why the normal user
doesn't have a clue about this? ... and meanly ... where are the
icons???
Well, "normal" users shouldn't have to worry about this. In fact
there should now be a global gtkrc file
Hello, list.
I have a silly (I expect) question about the topic in the subject line. After
(if and when?) this completes -- as I've had to "emerge --resume --skip-first"
a bunch of times -- how will I be able to determine which packages failed so I
may then attempt to emerge them individually (
On 8/23/06, Arnau Bria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now, after reading mini how-to, I found I have no wiresahrk "binary":
You probably need to add the gtk useflag. "echo
net-analyzer-wireshark gtk >>/etc/portage/package.use". Otherwise you
just get the console version, tshark.
HTH,
-Richard
--
On 8/23/06, michael higgins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a silly (I expect) question about the topic in the subject line. After (if and
when?) this completes -- as I've had to "emerge --resume --skip-first" a bunch
of times -- how will I be able to determine which packages failed so I may
Hi,
I'm trying to configure my apache to run in chroot using
mod_secure, following info on gentoo-wiki:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/Apache_chroot:_the_mod_security_way
After modifying my apache config and creating chroot
I tried to restart apache, but it is not running:
==
Totalmente OT, mas usuários Gentoo são uma das melhores fontes de
informação depois do Google :) em todo caso, me desculpem se deveria
ter postado em outro lugar...
Existe algum módulo para o Apache ou outro server que me permita,
através de um formulário, acessar uma página que é acessível pelo
On 8/23/06, Alan Mckinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Incidentally, gcc cannot use itself to compile itself - that's
nonsensical and a classic bootstrap problem. It uses a binary (which
happens to be a gcc) to compile the source code for gcc which produces
another binary. That binary then compiles
I'm really sorry, got the wrong address, it was supposed to go to
gentoo-user-br, anyway, I'll try to translate it for you people and
forward the original message to the right email.
This is completely OT.
I would like to access an HTTPS page using a server at my home machine
trough the squid se
On 8/23/06, Alan Mckinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you be absolutely certain I'm wrong? Can you absolutely guarantee
that a recompile with a different config MUST be treated differently to
an upgrade?
We are still talking about CFLAGS here, right? Then ok, no, it is not
_necessary_ to tr
Richard Fish wrote:
> Gcc is (almost) always built with -O2 on Gentoo, but it does not
> matter anyway. The CFLAGS that gcc is built with does not effect the
> binaries it generates...only the code and the flags passed to gcc
> during the compilation effect this. If your model were correct, you
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Richard Fish wrote:
> Oh, and BTW, on gentoo your optimization choices for gcc are -O, -O2
> or nothing, because all other -O options are replaced with -O2 by
> toolchain.eclass.
Since the OP wanted -Os, the question remains:
How, if at all, can he get -Os ?
--
Mike [EMAI
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 22:22, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> > Oh, and BTW, on gentoo your optimization choices for gcc are -O, -O2
> > or nothing, because all other -O options are replaced with -O2 by
> > toolchain.eclass.
>
> Since the OP wanted -Os, the question remains:
> How, if at all, can he
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 August 2006 22:22, Michael Hennebry wrote:
>>> Oh, and BTW, on gentoo your optimization choices for gcc are -O, -O2
>>> or nothing, because all other -O options are replaced with -O2 by
>>> toolchain.eclass.
>> Since the OP wanted -Os, the question remain
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 21:11, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
> I've checked reverse proxy configurations for apache, but I'm not sure
> if that's what I want, in fact, I want something similar to what's
> done by:
>
> http://www.the-cloak.com
>
> If there's something already written, I would like to
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 05:18, Richard Fish wrote:
> Actually there is. You can find all packages not compiled with -Os
> and rebuild them with something like:
>
> cd /var/db/pkg
> for pkg in */* ; do
> grep -v -- "-Os" $pkg/CFLAGS >/dev/null
> test $? -eq 0 && emerge --oneshot =$pkg
> d
Hi All,
I can't emerge either of these packages. I have remerged gcc to no avail.
How do I troubleshoot this?
These are the error messages for klibc:
=
KLIBCAS klibc/syscalls/__reboot.o
KLIBCAS klibc/syscalls/sysinfo.o
KLIBCAS klibc/syscalls/k
James wrote:
>> Daniel Iliev ilievnet.com> writes:
>>
>
>
> My iptables based firewall seem to be working, However, I keep getting
> triplets
> of this activity:
>
> curious.ip www.me.com tcp 2286 > netbios-ssn Seq=0 Len=0 MSS=1460
> www.me.com curious.ip tcp netbios-ssn > 2286 [RST,
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> > On Wednesday 23 August 2006 22:22, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> >>> Oh, and BTW, on gentoo your optimization choices for gcc are -O, -O2
> >>> or nothing, because all other -O options are replaced with -O2 by
> >>> toolc
Michael Hennebry wrote:
> Oh, and BTW, on gentoo your optimization choices for gcc are -O, -O2
> or nothing, because all other -O options are replaced with -O2 by
> toolchain.eclass.
>
> Perhaps I misunderstood the preceeding.
> I'd taken it to mean that recompiling any package with g
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 23:48, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> > >>> Oh, and BTW, on gentoo your optimization choices for gcc are -O, -O2
note 'choices for gcc' above ^
> > >>> or nothing, because all other -O options are replaced with -O2 by
> > >>> toolchain.e
On Thursday 24 August 2006 00:21, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> will either have to look at the ebuilds and any eclasses that they append
s/append/inherit/
--
Bo Andresen
pgpJ5logQmBhQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Jerry McBride wrote:
> Would some kind soul save me a bit of research time? Which of the two
> alternative init schemes are faster, initng or runit?
>
>
> Thank you in advance , Jerry
>
I have tried initng several months ago. It rocks. It's several times
faster then the "normal" init. The probl
On 8/23/06, Michael Hennebry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps I misunderstood the preceeding.
I'd taken it to mean that recompiling any package with gentoo tools
would result in -Os being replaced by -O2 .
Sorry if I wasn't clear. I'm only referring to the build of gcc itself here.
To try
On 8/23/06, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Discussion further down this thread has made us aware that this will always
make stuff like gcc, mozilla-firefox and openoffice become rebuilt despite
that rebuilding them won't change their CFLAGS at all...
Um, yeah. Definitely not per
On Thursday 24 August 2006 00:54, Richard Fish wrote:
> On 8/23/06, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Discussion further down this thread has made us aware that this will
> > always make stuff like gcc, mozilla-firefox and openoffice become rebuilt
> > despite that rebuilding them w
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 18:42, Daniel Iliev wrote:
> Jerry McBride wrote:
> > Would some kind soul save me a bit of research time? Which of the two
> > alternative init schemes are faster, initng or runit?
> >
> >
> > Thank you in advance , Jerry
>
> I have tried initng several months ago. It r
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 10:17, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
> Hi,
--snip--
>
> I'd like to add that gentoo's own /sbin/rc is not a feature of
> sysvinit. sysvinit is not *that* bad, after all. What has gone wild is
> the /etc/init.d style of doing things.
>
Amen! And a bottle neck of epic propor
* sdoma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-23 17:26] :
> Thanks, this was it. Where did you find this info? Why the normal user
> doesn't have a clue about this? ... and meanly ... where are the
> icons???
>
> Such issues is the main reason for me not to use GNOME.
>
> BTW: I didn't have the file
Jerry McBride wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 August 2006 18:42, Daniel Iliev wrote:
>
>> Jerry McBride wrote:
>>
>>> Would some kind soul save me a bit of research time? Which of the two
>>> alternative init schemes are faster, initng or runit?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you in advance , Jerry
>>>
gentuxx wrote:
> Actually, some of those ports are UDP. /etc/services says the same for
> both TCP and UDP. So if -p is required for --dport, you would have to
> add rules for UDP as well.
>
> iptables -A FORWARD -d *target-PC* -p udp --dport 137:139 -j DROP
> iptables -A INPUT -p udp --dport 137
Hi,
a longer time ago I read about terminal emulators, which claimed to
have "transparency" enabled. I tried them but found, that this
"transparency" was only a copy of the background. Moving the window
around shows, that it was not real transparent.
Is there any terminal emulator available,
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:02:01 +0200
"Johan Tibell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to create a custom LiveCD which is identical to the x86
> 2006.0 one but includes the latest madwifi (madwifi-ng?) and
> wpa_supplicant ebuilds so my WLAN works out-of-the-box when I boot
> using it. What w
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:28:16 -0700
Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would it be OK to remove the following aliases since I never use them:
>
> # Well-known aliases -- these should be filled in!
> root: grant
> operator: grant
>
> # Standard RFC2142 aliases
> abuse:
Any ideas at all, please?
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 22:11, Mick wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I can't emerge either of these packages. I have remerged gcc to no avail.
> How do I troubleshoot this?
>
> These are the error messages for klibc:
> =
> KLIBCAS kli
Mick wrote:
> Any ideas at all, please?
Tried bugs.gentoo.org? If you don't find it there yet, file a new bug.
Thanks,
Donnie
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 8/23/06, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any ideas at all, please?
I'm pretty sure both of these require configured kernel sources. They
should have checks for this, but I guess those checks could be
confused. Does /usr/src/linux point to a configured kernel? Are you
using the "symlink" u
63 matches
Mail list logo
