On Saturday 25 June 2011 14:39:40 Dale did opine thusly:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Well there's a few options:
> >
> > Adobe could publish the entire Flash spec so that projects like
> > gnash could implement them fully
> >
> > or the web could largely use something else instead like HTML5
> >
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Well there's a few options:
Adobe could publish the entire Flash spec so that projects like gnash
could implement them fully
or the web could largely use something else instead like HTML5
Both options are unlikely, more's the pity
I know HTML5 is a ways off but I'm
On Saturday 25 June 2011 13:39:33 Dale did opine thusly:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > This will never change, because you can't pick up a turd by the
> > clean end.
>
> ROFLMBO That is so true.
>
> I have to add. I subscribe to some service that emails security
> problems, usually when they are f
Alan McKinnon wrote:
This will never change, because you can't pick up a turd by the clean end.
ROFLMBO That is so true.
I have to add. I subscribe to some service that emails security
problems, usually when they are fixed but anyway. I get a LOT of those
related to flash. If you don
On Saturday 25 June 2011 18:38:10 András Csányi did opine thusly:
> On 2 June 2011 11:21, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Chromium is not the problem, Flash is the problem.
> >
> > Flash is a piece of shit that has never worked right and Adobe
> > are a bunch of fools that cannot code properly or secure
On 2 June 2011 11:21, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> Chromium is not the problem, Flash is the problem.
>
> Flash is a piece of shit that has never worked right and Adobe are a bunch of
> fools that cannot code properly or securely. I can comfortably say this based
> on long hard bitter experience by th
On 2011/06/03 19:49 (GMT-0400) Indi composed:
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 12:50:02AM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Mick wrote:
Agreed. I do wish we'd get something open and reasonably well coded to
replace flash,
I do hope that html5 will do away with it altogether.
you can ea
On 2 June 2011 20:22, Leonardo Guilherme wrote:
>
> Those lockups reminds me of hard disks lockups, when nothing works anymore
> exepct what was already been loaded on RAM. Maybe flash/chrome is writing to
> a broken area of your disk. Check the HD light, weird noises. Or RAM. I have
> no such pro
Apparently, though unproven, at 14:27 on Thursday 02 June 2011, András Csányi
did opine thusly:
> On 2 June 2011 11:21, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> While I wrote this letter Chromium become crazy again - thanks the
> >> automatic save few words has lost this letter - and I know that the
> >> root
On 6/2/2011 10:40 AM, Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Paul Hartman
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:49 AM, András Csányi wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Something strange happen here. I have seen few things in Linux world
>>> but this is very new for me!
>>>
>>> I have this f
On Thursday 02 June 2011 09:23:47 Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:49 AM, András Csányi wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Something strange happen here. I have seen few things in Linux world
> > but this is very new for me!
> >
> > I have this fantastic browser called Chromium (12.0.742.6
2011/6/2 András Csányi
> Hi All,
>
> Something strange happen here. I have seen few things in Linux world
> but this is very new for me!
>
> I have this fantastic browser called Chromium (12.0.742.68) and I
> really like it. But, sometimes, when I see flash videos on different
> sites (youtube, c
On Thursday 02 June 2011 11:44:26 András Csányi wrote:
> On 2 June 2011 11:32, Volker Armin Hemmann
wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 June 2011 10:49:44 András Csányi wrote:
> >
> >
> > what is hard about a killall -9 chrome?
>
> Nothing. But as far I remember the process called chromium not chrome
>
Apparently, though unproven, at 15:47 on Thursday 02 June 2011, Indi did opine
thusly:
> Maybe before throwing out the baby with the bathwater he should do some
> more testing in another browser. In the past I've seen behavior not
> unlike that described due to flash, but if flash is the culprit
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:49 AM, András Csányi wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Something strange happen here. I have seen few things in Linux world
>> but this is very new for me!
>>
>> I have this fantastic browser called Chromium (12.0.742.68) and I
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:49 AM, András Csányi wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Something strange happen here. I have seen few things in Linux world
> but this is very new for me!
>
> I have this fantastic browser called Chromium (12.0.742.68) and I
> really like it. But, sometimes, when I see flash videos on
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 11:30:02AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 10:49 on Thursday 02 June 2011, András Csányi
> did opine thusly:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Something strange happen here. I have seen few things in Linux world
> > but this is very new for me!
> >
> >
On 02.06.2011 13:42, Jesús J. Guerrero Botella wrote:
I don't have spare time for philosophical stuff (and it's not amongst
my insterests anyway). But, you can always use some extension to block
flash contents. Then you click only in the flashes you want to see.
That will probably help to narrow
On 2 June 2011 14:38, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
> Am 02.06.2011 14:27, schrieb András Csányi:
>
>> Why die another applications if the browser crashes? For example
>> console stuffs as htop, grep, less and others? Harmed seriously the
>> graphic abilities of the system in this case?
>
> For me that
Am 02.06.2011 14:27, schrieb András Csányi:
> Why die another applications if the browser crashes? For example
> console stuffs as htop, grep, less and others? Harmed seriously the
> graphic abilities of the system in this case?
For me that looks like a problem of some other kind (maybe hardware
On 2 June 2011 11:21, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> While I wrote this letter Chromium become crazy again - thanks the
>> automatic save few words has lost this letter - and I know that the
>> root cause the Chromium itself and the flash isn't matter. Flash just
>> make faster that process when Chromi
I don't have spare time for philosophical stuff (and it's not amongst
my insterests anyway). But, you can always use some extension to block
flash contents. Then you click only in the flashes you want to see.
That will probably help to narrow down the scope of the problem. So,
try adblock and flash
On 2 June 2011 11:32, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Thursday 02 June 2011 10:49:44 András Csányi wrote:
>
>
> what is hard about a killall -9 chrome?
Nothing. But as far I remember the process called chromium not chrome
and you know before I type something into console I would like to be
sure
On Thursday 02 June 2011 10:49:44 András Csányi wrote:
what is hard about a killall -9 chrome?
Apparently, though unproven, at 10:49 on Thursday 02 June 2011, András Csányi
did opine thusly:
> Hi All,
>
> Something strange happen here. I have seen few things in Linux world
> but this is very new for me!
>
> I have this fantastic browser called Chromium (12.0.742.68) and I
> really like i
25 matches
Mail list logo
