>You need three things (my experience) - a patch for portage-2.1_preX/4;
>emerge "confcache" from portage and put FEATURES="...confcache..."
>in /etc/make.conf. This works for me.
>The patch is:confcache-final (IIRC) search mailing-list archives for it.
>Or mail me directly.
>
>
Thanks Rumen - I
On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 16:57 +, Rohit Sharma wrote:
> >Hi,
> >On 'gentoo-portage-dev' ML there are such patch (for portage-2.1_preX)
> >plus in portage there's a package:
> >* dev-util/confcache
> > Available versions: 0.3.3 0.4 0.4.1
> > Installed: 0.4.1
> > Homepage:
>Hi,
>On 'gentoo-portage-dev' ML there are such patch (for portage-2.1_preX)
>plus in portage there's a package:
>* dev-util/confcache
> Available versions: 0.3.3 0.4 0.4.1
> Installed: 0.4.1
> Homepage:http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/confcache
> Description:
On Saturday 18 February 2006 02:38, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Thought : making the build/emerge faster':
> On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 08:24:17 + Rohit Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> | But since I am a very average
On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 08:24 +, Rohit Sharma wrote:
> Hi there,
> It just occurred to me that the emerges shall be much faster if emerges
> were able to use config.cache set by other applications. The steps
> during ./configure could be saved globally in an /etc/config.cache which
> could be co
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 08:24:17 + Rohit Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| But since I am a very average guy and there are many people much
| smarter than myself out there in gentoo, I think this idea has been
| discarded long ago since there are incompatibilities amongst various
| software in th
6 matches
Mail list logo
