I haven't checked lately, but when I upgraded to modular Xorg, the
following font package was missing:
media-fonts/font-schumacher-misc
I was unable to run a program I'd compiled myself---xtide.
Alan Davis
On 7/13/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> I n
Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> I notice that some of the fonts you mention are keyword masked (at
> least on x86). For example font-bitstream-* (except for -vera) and
> font-ibm-type1. Are these fonts less tested? Would you recommend
> unmasking all of them? Would you want me to file a bug asking for
At Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:50:11 -0700 Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> darren kirby wrote:
>> quoth the Donnie Berkholz:
>>> Try font-adobe-100dpi or font-adobe-75dpi or possibly font-ibm-type1.
>>
>> The adobe fonts were already installed (no 10 pitch) and I installed the IBM
>> fonts
darren kirby wrote:
> quoth the Donnie Berkholz:
>> darren kirby wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I just completed upgrading to Xorg 7.0 and it went fine, however, I seem
>>> to be missing "Courier 10 pitch" which was the only monospaced font that
>>> looks decent on my screen. When I started X all my
quoth the Donnie Berkholz:
> darren kirby wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I just completed upgrading to Xorg 7.0 and it went fine, however, I seem
> > to be missing "Courier 10 pitch" which was the only monospaced font that
> > looks decent on my screen. When I started X all my monospaced fonts were
darren kirby wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I just completed upgrading to Xorg 7.0 and it went fine, however, I seem to
> be
> missing "Courier 10 pitch" which was the only monospaced font that looks
> decent on my screen. When I started X all my monospaced fonts were set as
> courier which looks ter
6 matches
Mail list logo
