Allan Gottlieb wrote: > I notice that some of the fonts you mention are keyword masked (at > least on x86). For example font-bitstream-* (except for -vera) and > font-ibm-type1. Are these fonts less tested? Would you recommend > unmasking all of them? Would you want me to file a bug asking for > stabilization? I should add that I am not at all hurting with just > the (stable) fonts that I do have installed.
I've mentioned this elsewhere, but the idea is that we're trying to figure out which programs, fonts, etc people really use and need. If you actually use something (not just install it and never use the fonts or whatever), please file a bug requesting that it be stabled. Thanks, Donnie
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
