gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Inconsistent behavior in my Gentoo OS instance
On 170505-22:40-0400, Bobby Kent wrote:
> Looks like there are two things that concern you. Firstly, how bash
> tab expansion appears to work (the ls, etc. commands executed when you
> hit the tab
riggers-a-script behavior, but I certainly don't know if anything
was planted in my hardware... It's not Open Hardware,[5] so even if I
knew how to check firware and stuff, I couldn't check much of it, let
alone all of it...
> -Original Message-
> From: Miroslav Rovis [mailto:miro.
Message-
From: Miroslav Rovis [mailto:miro.ro...@croatiafidelis.hr]
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2017 01:02
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Inconsistent behavior in my Gentoo OS instance
Hi Bobby!
Pls. see also:
Tab (no exec) triggers script on Bash on grsec admin
https://forum
; -Original Message-
> From: Miroslav Rovis [mailto:miro.ro...@croatiafidelis.hr]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2017 10:13
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Inconsistent behavior in my Gentoo OS instance
>
> I've received one reply, and thanks aga
.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Miroslav Rovis [mailto:miro.ro...@croatiafidelis.hr]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2017 10:13
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Inconsistent behavior in my Gentoo OS instance
I've received one reply, and thanks again, but I had b
On 170503-07:03+0200, Miroslav Rovis wrote:
> On 170502-22:19-0400, Bobby Kent wrote:
> > Regarding the fourth issue:
> > > g0n ~ # eix memtest86+
> > > * sys-apps/memtest86
> > > Available versions: 4.3.7 (~)4.3.7-r1 {serial}
> > > Homepage:http://www.memtest86.com/
> > >
On 170502-22:19-0400, Bobby Kent wrote:
> Regarding the fourth issue:
> > g0n ~ # eix memtest86+
> > * sys-apps/memtest86
> > Available versions: 4.3.7 (~)4.3.7-r1 {serial}
> > Homepage:http://www.memtest86.com/
> > Description: A stand alone memory test for x86
On 170502-17:51+0200, Raffaele Belardi wrote:
> Miroslav Rovis wrote:
> > On 170502-10:33+0200, Raffaele Belardi wrote:
> >> Miroslav Rovis wrote:
> >>> gzip apparently inconsistent behavior occupies the most part of the
> >>> report on
> >>> inconsistencies here (esp. the script make_gzip_archive
Regarding the fourth issue:
> g0n ~ # eix memtest86+
> * sys-apps/memtest86
> Available versions: 4.3.7 (~)4.3.7-r1 {serial}
> Homepage:http://www.memtest86.com/
> Description: A stand alone memory test for x86 computers
...
>
> Found 2 matches
> Received SIGSEG
Miroslav Rovis wrote:
On 170502-10:33+0200, Raffaele Belardi wrote:
Miroslav Rovis wrote:
gzip apparently inconsistent behavior occupies the most part of the report on
inconsistencies here (esp. the script make_gzip_archives_consistent.sh).
Checked on my system, same behaviour, looking inside
I've received one reply, and thanks again, but I had better remove the
gzip-"inconsistency" related bloat from my own previous email... I need the
previous text to make the remaining three important
parts/issues/inconsistencies clearer and easier to check, and reply to,
any of the three.
I will al
On 170502-10:33+0200, Raffaele Belardi wrote:
> Miroslav Rovis wrote:
> > gzip apparently inconsistent behavior occupies the most part of the report
> > on
> > inconsistencies here (esp. the script make_gzip_archives_consistent.sh).
>
> Checked on my system, same behaviour, looking inside the gzi
Miroslav Rovis wrote:
gzip apparently inconsistent behavior occupies the most part of the report on
inconsistencies here (esp. the script make_gzip_archives_consistent.sh).
Checked on my system, same behaviour, looking inside the gzip file you see why. I used
shed but strings is easier:
$ s
13 matches
Mail list logo
