Re: IDE for C/C++ (Was: Really OT now (Re: [gentoo-user] udev + /usr)

2011-09-16 Thread Alan Mackenzie
Hi, Michael. On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 08:22:17PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote: > I don't see an ebuild for Emacs CC-Mode. CC Mode is distributed along with the rest of {,X}Emacs (although I think XEmacs half-splits all its packages off from its cord). Those version of CC Mode are somewhat out of dat

Re: IDE for C/C++ (Was: Really OT now (Re: [gentoo-user] udev + /usr)

2011-09-16 Thread Michael Mol
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Mike Edenfield wrote: > On 9/15/2011 8:22 PM, Michael Mol wrote: > > But 3.6 introduced a *ton* of new dependencies that the Gentoo folks > haven't been able to work out properly in portage.[1] > > Of course, that's also likely an indication that Eclipse is getting

Re: IDE for C/C++ (Was: Really OT now (Re: [gentoo-user] udev + /usr)

2011-09-16 Thread Mike Edenfield
On 9/15/2011 8:22 PM, Michael Mol wrote: I don't show an ebuild for eclipse (I see dev-java/ant-eclipse-ecj, dev-java/eclipse-ecj and dev-util/eclipse-sdk). Last time I poked eclipse, it was a royal pain using any *DT unless one downloaded it as a packaged deal. Version dependencies were a pain.

Re: IDE for C/C++ (Was: Really OT now (Re: [gentoo-user] udev + /usr)

2011-09-16 Thread Michael Schreckenbauer
On Thursday, 15. September 2011 20:22:17 Michael Mol wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Chris Brennan wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Leonardo Guilherme > > > > wrote: > >> I do not know the state of Geanny since I last checked (couple of > >> years > >> ago), but the highligh

Re: IDE for C/C++ (Was: Really OT now (Re: [gentoo-user] udev + /usr)

2011-09-15 Thread Michael Mol
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Chris Brennan wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Leonardo Guilherme > wrote: >> >> I do not know the state of Geanny since I last checked (couple of years >> ago), but the highlight capabilites of KDevelop got my eye. It highlights >> local variables in dif

Re: IDE for C/C++ (Was: Really OT now (Re: [gentoo-user] udev + /usr)

2011-09-15 Thread Joost Roeleveld
On Thursday, September 15, 2011 04:05:29 PM Michael Mol wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Chris Brennan wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Leonardo Guilherme > > > > wrote: > >> I do not know the state of Geanny since I last checked (couple of > >> years > >> ago), but the highl

Re: IDE for C/C++ (Was: Really OT now (Re: [gentoo-user] udev + /usr)

2011-09-15 Thread Alexander Tanyukevich
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Alexander Tanyukevich wrote: > Try eclipse with cdk (C/C++ developr kit). Last time I've used it 3 > years ago, but it was really good... Sorry it's called CDT. -- Alexander Tanyukevich atanyukev...@gmail.com

Re: IDE for C/C++ (Was: Really OT now (Re: [gentoo-user] udev + /usr)

2011-09-15 Thread Alexander Tanyukevich
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Michael Mol wrote: > > I'm not touching KDE again for a while. I got nailed pretty bad with a > NVidia/Konsole/KWin, and I really wasn't using much of KDE. > > That said, I might poke KDevelop again; I haven't poked it in years. > Geany is new since I last dug arou

Re: IDE for C/C++ (Was: Really OT now (Re: [gentoo-user] udev + /usr)

2011-09-15 Thread Michael Mol
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Chris Brennan wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Leonardo Guilherme > wrote: >> >> I do not know the state of Geanny since I last checked (couple of years >> ago), but the highlight capabilites of KDevelop got my eye. It highlights >> local variables in dif

Re: IDE for C/C++ (Was: Really OT now (Re: [gentoo-user] udev + /usr)

2011-09-15 Thread Chris Brennan
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Leonardo Guilherme wrote: I do not know the state of Geanny since I last checked (couple of years > ago), but the highlight capabilites of KDevelop got my eye. It highlights > local variables in different colors in the same context, so something like > > int foo(f

Re: IDE for C/C++ (Was: Really OT now (Re: [gentoo-user] udev + /usr)

2011-09-15 Thread Leonardo Guilherme
2011/9/15 Michael Mol > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:58 PM, David W Noon wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 18:35:37 -0400, Michael Mol wrote about Re: Really > > OT now (Re: [gentoo-user] udev + /usr): > > > >> It occurred to me that having a decent C and C++ editing environment > >> might ease some o

Re: IDE for C/C++ (Was: Really OT now (Re: [gentoo-user] udev + /usr)

2011-09-15 Thread Michael Mol
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:58 PM, David W Noon wrote: > On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 18:35:37 -0400, Michael Mol wrote about Re: Really > OT now (Re: [gentoo-user] udev + /usr): > >> It occurred to me that having a decent C and C++ editing environment >> might ease some of my of the spoilage I've experience

IDE for C/C++ (Was: Really OT now (Re: [gentoo-user] udev + /usr)

2011-09-15 Thread David W Noon
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 18:35:37 -0400, Michael Mol wrote about Re: Really OT now (Re: [gentoo-user] udev + /usr): > It occurred to me that having a decent C and C++ editing environment > might ease some of my of the spoilage I've experienced in Visual > Studio for C++. I'll be checking it out. It'll