On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 05:22:27AM -0400, Rasmus Thomsen wrote
> Hi,
>
> unwind tables sounds really interesting, but does it affect the
> binary size when I compile with -O2 anyway?
Yes, because it's a different part of the build. Personal experience;
I do the contributed SSE-only Pale Moon b
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 11:05:14AM +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote
> Many thanks for your hints!
>
> On 05/14/2017 07:13:05 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > Out of sheer curiousity, what
> > does gcc report as your native cpu when you run...
> >
> > gcc -c -Q -march=native --help=target | grep march=
>
>
Hi,
unwind tables sounds really interesting, but does it affect the binary size
when I compile with -O2 anyway?
Regards,
Rasmus
Original Message
On 14 May 2017, 07:13, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 10:21:19AM +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote
>
> I have switched to gcc
Many thanks for your hints!
On 05/14/2017 07:13:05 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
Why aren't you running "-march=native"? You're probably missing
quite
a few features of your cpu. BTW, "-march=native" implies
"-mtune=native"
and "-msse3" (if the cpu supports it). Out of sheer curiousity, what
d
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 10:21:19AM +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote
>
> I have switched to gcc-6.3.0 at the end of last year.
> I have (re-)compiled all my packages including icewm-1.3.12-r1.
> Everything works just fine.
>
> I did have some segfaults (with gimp) until I recompiled each package
> w
On 170513-17:25+0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 05/13/2017 04:07:52 PM, Miroslav Rovis wrote:
> > On 170513-10:21+0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > > On 05/13/2017 05:56:16 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 08:38:56PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote
> > > > > "Walter's Excellent Ad
On 05/13/2017 04:07:52 PM, Miroslav Rovis wrote:
On 170513-10:21+0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 05/13/2017 05:56:16 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 08:38:56PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote
> > > "Walter's Excellent Adventure Continues"... Now that I've got
ICEWM
> > > built,
On 170513-10:21+0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 05/13/2017 05:56:16 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 08:38:56PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote
> > > "Walter's Excellent Adventure Continues"... Now that I've got ICEWM
> > > built, I'm trying to start X. I copied over my ~/.icewm cir
On 05/13/2017 05:56:16 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 08:38:56PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote
> "Walter's Excellent Adventure Continues"... Now that I've got
ICEWM
> built, I'm trying to start X. I copied over my ~/.icewm cirectory,
the
> .xinitrc, and local X startup script fr
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 08:38:56PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote
> "Walter's Excellent Adventure Continues"... Now that I've got ICEWM
> built, I'm trying to start X. I copied over my ~/.icewm cirectory, the
> .xinitrc, and local X startup script from my current machine, where it
> all works. I run
"Walter's Excellent Adventure Continues"... Now that I've got ICEWM
built, I'm trying to start X. I copied over my ~/.icewm cirectory, the
.xinitrc, and local X startup script from my current machine, where it
all works. I run "startx", and the X window pops up and I can see the
cursor... for h
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 02:15:23PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote
> On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 07:55:30AM +0200, Raffaele Belardi wrote
>
> Bringing a 2008 Core2 duo back into use. I ran into major problems
> with graphite optimizations. So I re-installed without graphite.
>
> I copied over most of
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 07:55:30AM +0200, Raffaele Belardi wrote
Bringing a 2008 Core2 duo back into use. I ran into major problems
with graphite optimizations. So I re-installed without graphite.
I copied over most of the world file from my current desktop (GCC
5.4.0) and tried it on the t
I've been running some number theory on my CPU 24/7 for the last
month... It's a good burn-in because it uses all my cpu and all my ram.
=P The run will complete a month from now, I hope...
Kinda stoked about gcc 6.x coming, really looking forward to rebuilding
my system, hope things go well by th
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 12:59:12AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote
> I blew away the partially completed install and started again.
> This time, it'll be 6.3.0 without graphite.
>
> I'm busy Tuesday morning. So I'll fire up an "emerge -e @world"
> before going to bed, and see where things are when I ge
I have a 2008 dual core Core2 that I gave up on because it doesn't
support QEMU hardware acceleration. Now that I've figured out chroot
for stuff I need, I decided to do a new 32-bit install. I figured this
might be a chance to experiment with GCC 6.3.0. I went whole-hog and
enabled graphite,
On May 8, 2017 1:47:22 PM GMT+02:00, Dale wrote:
>Raffaele Belardi wrote:
>> During the weekend I 'emerge -e' a couple of ~amd64 systems with
>> gcc-6.3.0:
>>
>> 1. gnome desktop, 1000 packages, all build fine except:
>> - net-libs/webkit-gtk, rebuilding it again after world fixed it
>> (possibly
Raffaele Belardi wrote:
> During the weekend I 'emerge -e' a couple of ~amd64 systems with
> gcc-6.3.0:
>
> 1. gnome desktop, 1000 packages, all build fine except:
> - net-libs/webkit-gtk, rebuilding it again after world fixed it
> (possibly an issue with -j MAKEOPTS, a similar build failure is
> m
During the weekend I 'emerge -e' a couple of ~amd64 systems with gcc-6.3.0:
1. gnome desktop, 1000 packages, all build fine except:
- net-libs/webkit-gtk, rebuilding it again after world fixed it (possibly an issue with -j
MAKEOPTS, a similar build failure is mentioned in bug 515968 although it'
19 matches
Mail list logo
