On May 8, 2017 1:47:22 PM GMT+02:00, Dale <rdalek1...@gmail.com> wrote: >Raffaele Belardi wrote: >> During the weekend I 'emerge -e' a couple of ~amd64 systems with >> gcc-6.3.0: >> >> 1. gnome desktop, 1000 packages, all build fine except: >> - net-libs/webkit-gtk, rebuilding it again after world fixed it >> (possibly an issue with -j MAKEOPTS, a similar build failure is >> mentioned in bug 515968 although it's for an older package version) >> - sci-electronics/gnucap (bug 594184) >> - games-action/armagetronad (bugs 610844, 617768) >> >> 2. lxde media center, 850 packages, all fine except: >> - games-sports/trigger >> - games-sports/torcs >> Haven't had time to process these yet. >> >> Looks like it's still better to keep a gcc-5.x version around. >> >> raffaele >> >> > > >I'm glad you posted this. I read on -dev the other day about them >thinking about skipping to gcc 7 or something. I was thinking about >jumping to gcc 6 for now. I was curious as to the problems tho since >it >is not likely to widely used yet. Then here comes your post about it. >You pretty much answered my question except that I use KDE where it >seems you use Gnome. > >You have ESP or something?? lol > >Anyone using KDE and gcc 6 yet? Problems? > >Dale > >:-) :-)
Only recently got my desktop converted to 5.4. Next is my laptop. When that is done, I could risk 6 on my desktop. But if Dev is thinking of skipping it.... -- Joost -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
