On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:15:12 -0400, John covici wrote:
> OK, I will try making all the gst-plugins unstable and see if that
> fixes things -- I have been warned not to convert the whole box to
> unstable -- is this a correct warning?
I don't believe so. Marking a few packages as testing on packag
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, John covici wrote:
> OK, I will try making all the gst-plugins unstable and see if that
> fixes things -- I have been warned not to convert the whole box to
> unstable -- is this a correct warning?
Depends how much you adore gentoo and how much time you are willing t
on Wednesday 04/30/2008 Alan McKinnon([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> On Wednesday 30 April 2008, John covici wrote:
> > on Wednesday 04/30/2008 Alan McKinnon([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> >
>
> > > [nomerge ] media-sound/sound-juicer-2.22.0 [2.20.1-r1]
> > > USE="-debug -test (-flac%*) (-ogg
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 April 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote:
> > > /me lumbers off in search of mind-altering substances with
> > > depressant side-effects
> >
> > Just watch TV for a while.
>
> Yeah right :-)
>
> 4 possibilities:
>
> SABC 1
> SABC 2
> SABC 3
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, John covici wrote:
> on Wednesday 04/30/2008 Alan McKinnon([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
>
> > [nomerge ] media-sound/sound-juicer-2.22.0 [2.20.1-r1]
> > USE="-debug -test (-flac%*) (-ogg%*)"
> > [ebuild U ] media-plugins/gst-plugins-meta-0.10-r2 [0.10]
> > USE
on Wednesday 04/30/2008 Alan McKinnon([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> On Wednesday 30 April 2008, John covici wrote:
>
> > OK, here is the requested output.
>
> These questions are coming up a lot lately, and it's always the same
> stuff: how the hell do I read this output? I don;t have these t
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote:
> > /me lumbers off in search of mind-altering substances with
> > depressant side-effects
>
> Just watch TV for a while.
Yeah right :-)
4 possibilities:
SABC 1
SABC 2
SABC 3
eTV
Which would you recommend?
--
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon at
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:45:35 +0100, Uwe Thiem wrote:
> > Thanks Neil, thanks a lot for mentioning that. Now I have
> > horrifying images burned into my brain of doxygen, openjade, SGML
> > and DTDs lumbering out of holes in the ground and slithering
> > towards me, zombie-like, hell bent on devour
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:00:40 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Thanks Neil, thanks a lot for mentioning that. Now I have horrifying
> images burned into my brain of doxygen, openjade, SGML and DTDs
> lumbering out of holes in the ground and slithering towards me,
> zombie-like, hell bent on devouri
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:16:07 -0400, John covici wrote:
> I put the doc flag in there because a number of packages -- and I
> can't remember which ones now -- needed it, I think apache was one of
> them, so I gave up and did it -- maybe taking it out for the time
> being will help things along.
I
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 April 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > USE="doc" adds extra documentation, usually API information
> > for programmers, which is why it is rarely needed globally. The
> > doc flag increases the dependencies of some packages, sometimes
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, John covici wrote:
> I put the doc flag in there because a number of packages -- and I
> can't remember which ones now -- needed it, I think apache was one of
> them, so I gave up and did it -- maybe taking it out for the time
> being will help things along.
'equery has
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> USE="doc" adds extra documentation, usually API information
> for programmers, which is why it is rarely needed globally. The doc
> flag increases the dependencies of some packages, sometimes
> massively.
Thanks Neil, thanks a lot for mentioning
on Wednesday 04/30/2008 Neil Bothwick([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:58:23 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> > These questions are coming up a lot lately, and it's always the same
> > stuff: how the hell do I read this output? I don;t have these things
> > installed.
>
>
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:58:23 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> These questions are coming up a lot lately, and it's always the same
> stuff: how the hell do I read this output? I don;t have these things
> installed.
[good stuff snipped]
Two other things that help. You have 228 packages marked for
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, John covici wrote:
> OK, here is the requested output.
These questions are coming up a lot lately, and it's always the same
stuff: how the hell do I read this output? I don;t have these things
installed. Basic ideas of blockers;
The output doesn't mean that you have
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:03:29 -0400, John covici wrote:
> But now I have still more problems with blocking --
> [blocks B ] media-libs/gstreamer-0.10.19)
> [blocks B ] dev-util/gtk-doc-am (is blocking
> dev-util/gtk-doc-1.8-r2)
Please show the whole output of your world update command, w
on Wednesday 04/30/2008 John covici([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> on Wednesday 04/30/2008 Neil Bothwick([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> > On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 07:24:59 -0400, John covici wrote:
> >
> > > > > I was trying to do an --update --deep --with-bdeps=y world today
> > > > > and got the f
on Wednesday 04/30/2008 Neil Bothwick([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 07:24:59 -0400, John covici wrote:
>
> > > > I was trying to do an --update --deep --with-bdeps=y world today
> > > > and got the following strange message:
> > > > [blocks B ] > > > dev-libs/libgwea
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 07:24:59 -0400, John covici wrote:
> > > I was trying to do an --update --deep --with-bdeps=y world today
> > > and got the following strange message:
> > > [blocks B ] > > dev-libs/libgweather-2.22.1.1)
> Hi. The first case is the correct one -- the packages are in
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, John covici wrote:
> Hi. The first case is the correct one -- the packages are in
> portage, but the version numbers listed are not on the system -- this
> is what I meant -- so I have two packages blocking each other the
> blocking versions are not on the system at all
on Wednesday 04/30/2008 Alan McKinnon([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> On Wednesday 30 April 2008, John covici wrote:
> > I was trying to do an --update --deep --with-bdeps=y world today and
> > got the following strange message:
> > [blocks B ] > dev-libs/libgweather-2.22.1.1)
> >
> > Now I h
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, John covici wrote:
> I was trying to do an --update --deep --with-bdeps=y world today and
> got the following strange message:
> [blocks B ] dev-libs/libgweather-2.22.1.1)
>
> Now I have neither of these on my system, so what is the matter -- is
> portage insane? I
on Tuesday 04/29/2008 Ian Graeme Hilt([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> On Tuesday 29 April 2008 08:27:57 pm John covici wrote:
> > I was trying to do an --update --deep --with-bdeps=y world
> > today and got the following strange message:
> > [blocks B ] > dev-libs/libgweather-2.22.1.1)
>
> L
On Tuesday 29 April 2008 08:27:57 pm John covici wrote:
> I was trying to do an --update --deep --with-bdeps=y world
> today and got the following strange message:
> [blocks B ] dev-libs/libgweather-2.22.1.1)
Looks like you're running unstable. In this case you're supposed
to know what to do
I was trying to do an --update --deep --with-bdeps=y world today and
got the following strange message:
[blocks B ]
26 matches
Mail list logo
