On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Marc Joliet wrote:
>
> I'm somewhat confused about the whole thing. Wasn't the core problem of
> accidentally bricking devices solved by the kernel by making
> a subset of EFI variables immutable? (Actaully, I found the commit, which
> says that variables ar immu
Am Dienstag, 15. August 2017, 22:02:19 CEST schrieb Mike Gilbert:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Mick wrote:
> >> I can't recall if I did this myself in a moment of security induced
> >> inspiration. I doubt I did. So how did this ha
On Thursday 17 Aug 2017 11:25:04 Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
> > On Tuesday 15 August 2017 22:12:41 Mick wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 15 Aug 2017 16:02:19 Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> >> > > On Tue,
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 August 2017 22:12:41 Mick wrote:
>> On Tuesday 15 Aug 2017 16:02:19 Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Mick
> wrote:
>> > >> I can't recall
On Tuesday 15 August 2017 22:12:41 Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 Aug 2017 16:02:19 Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Mick
wrote:
> > >> I can't recall if I did this myself in a moment of security induced
> > >> insp
On Tuesday 15 Aug 2017 16:02:19 Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Mick wrote:
> >> I can't recall if I did this myself in a moment of security induced
> >> inspiration. I doubt I did. So how did this happen? What is
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Mick wrote:
>>
>> I can't recall if I did this myself in a moment of security induced
>> inspiration. I doubt I did. So how did this happen? What is responsible
>> for
>> mounting this fs?
>>
>
> It looks
On 15 August 2017 20:17:20 GMT+02:00, Rich Freeman wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Mick
>wrote:
>>
>> I can't recall if I did this myself in a moment of security induced
>> inspiration. I doubt I did. So how did this happen? What is
>responsible for
>> mounting this fs?
>>
>
>It look
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Mick wrote:
>
> I can't recall if I did this myself in a moment of security induced
> inspiration. I doubt I did. So how did this happen? What is responsible for
> mounting this fs?
>
It looks like this never did turn into a news item:
https://archives.gentoo.
After some years of trouble free UEFI use on a PC with a Kaveri APU, I've
suddenly come across a problem of incorrectly mounted efivarfs. I realised
something was amiss when I tried to set up a new kernel I had just copied into
/boot/EFI/BOOT/
# tree /boot
/boot
├── 42GHz2400MHz.CMO
└── EFI
10 matches
Mail list logo