Helmut Jarausch writes:
> On 12/21/10 15:41:20, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>> My plan is to stay like this until xorg 1.9 hits ~amd64 since I
>
> It is already unmasked in ~amd64 (It's running just fine here)
Bingo. There was a mesa problem a while ago (7.8.2) that caused me to
mask =media-libs/mesa
On 12/21/2010 9:41 AM, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> To summarize
>
> 1. All is running fine but.
>
> 2. deplcean wants to remove hal and when it does xdm will not run.
Is it just xdm that doesn't run? That is, if you disable xdm and log in
via the console, can you run startx?
It's possible that
On 12/21/10 15:41:20, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> My plan is to stay like this until xorg 1.9 hits ~amd64 since I
It is already unmasked in ~amd64 (It's running just fine here)
Helmut.
Allan Gottlieb wrote:
Dale writes:
Le 20 décembre à 15:12 Allan Gottlieb a écrit
Something seems wrong.
Yesterday depclean removed hal and then xdm wouldn't run.
Re-merging hal (with -1) fixed this, but again today depclean wants to
remove it.
I'm running amd64 her
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>
> To summarize
>
> 1. All is running fine but.
>
> 2. deplcean wants to remove hal and when it does xdm will not run.
>
> 3. I have run emerge world with --newuse, and have run revdep-rebuild,
> and have remerged xdm.
>
> 4. Currentl
Dale writes:
>>> Le 20 décembre à 15:12 Allan Gottlieb a écrit
>>>
Something seems wrong.
Yesterday depclean removed hal and then xdm wouldn't run.
Re-merging hal (with -1) fixed this, but again today depclean wants to
remove it.
>
> I'm running amd64 here but xdm doesn'
On 12/20/2010 10:04 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>> Le 20 décembre à 15:12 Allan Gottlieb a écrit
>>>
Something seems wrong.
Yesterday depclean removed hal and then xdm wouldn't run.
Re-merging hal (with -1) fixed this, but again today depclean wants to
remove it.
> Installed vers
Allan Gottlieb wrote:
Vincent-Xavier JUMEL writes:
Le 20 décembre à 15:12 Allan Gottlieb a écrit
Something seems wrong.
Yesterday depclean removed hal and then xdm wouldn't run.
Re-merging hal (with -1) fixed this, but again today depclean wants to
remove it.
Have you look
On Monday 20 December 2010 15:55:40 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> Vincent-Xavier JUMEL writes:
> > Le 20 décembre à 15:12 Allan Gottlieb a écrit
> >
> >> Something seems wrong.
> >> Yesterday depclean removed hal and then xdm wouldn't run.
> >> Re-merging hal (with -1) fixed this, but again today depcl
Vincent-Xavier JUMEL writes:
> Le 20 décembre à 15:12 Allan Gottlieb a écrit
>> Something seems wrong.
>> Yesterday depclean removed hal and then xdm wouldn't run.
>> Re-merging hal (with -1) fixed this, but again today depclean wants to
>> remove it.
>>
> Have you look on how X.org packages are
Le 20 décembre à 15:12 Allan Gottlieb a écrit
> Something seems wrong.
> Yesterday depclean removed hal and then xdm wouldn't run.
> Re-merging hal (with -1) fixed this, but again today depclean wants to
> remove it.
>
Have you look on how X.org packages are built on your computer. You should buil
Something seems wrong.
Yesterday depclean removed hal and then xdm wouldn't run.
Re-merging hal (with -1) fixed this, but again today depclean wants to
remove it.
I can easily add hal to world, but should xdm depend on it?
allan
12 matches
Mail list logo
