On 3/9/20 11:35 AM, Consus wrote:
>
> But maybe the person who maintains ebuild does not have enough time to
> ensure that all QA requirements are met. E.g. installing (willingly) an
> unstable package is not the same as installing a "stable" package that
> in fact is not.
>
No one even agrees o
On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 04:42:20PM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 3/8/20 4:22 PM, Consus wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is it somehow possible to install unstable packages on stable Gentoo
> > without manual unmasking? Say, package dev-util/perf does not have _any_
> > stable ebuild, so IMO there is
On 3/8/20 4:22 PM, Consus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it somehow possible to install unstable packages on stable Gentoo
> without manual unmasking? Say, package dev-util/perf does not have _any_
> stable ebuild, so IMO there is actually no point in manual unmasking,
> because user does not have any choice
For me there is no point in having a "stable" gentoo managed like this (I
really like debian stable). I'm using unstable gentoo since 2017 because a
whole bunch of packages I installed only exist in ~amd64.
Il Dom 8 Mar 2020, 21:22 Consus ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> Is it somehow possible to install u
Hi,
Is it somehow possible to install unstable packages on stable Gentoo
without manual unmasking? Say, package dev-util/perf does not have _any_
stable ebuild, so IMO there is actually no point in manual unmasking,
because user does not have any choice between stable/unstable.
5 matches
Mail list logo
