On 3/9/20 11:35 AM, Consus wrote: > > But maybe the person who maintains ebuild does not have enough time to > ensure that all QA requirements are met. E.g. installing (willingly) an > unstable package is not the same as installing a "stable" package that > in fact is not. >
No one even agrees on what "stable" means, so I can't make any promises.
But ideally, the maintainer would determine which of the two cases ("I
forgot" or "this package is junk") applies and make a decision based on
that.
