On 05/07/2013 10:49 AM, Stroller wrote:
>
> On 6 May 2013, at 21:07, Randolph Maaßen wrote:
>
>> - When a file is deleted the file system marks the block device
>> sectors as free and sends the TRIM command to the SSD and the SSD
>> really frees the underlying cell / breaks the cell - section all
On 07/05/2013 16:49, Stroller wrote:
>
> On 6 May 2013, at 21:07, Randolph Maaßen wrote:
>
>> - When a file is deleted the file system marks the block device
>> sectors as free and sends the TRIM command to the SSD and the SSD
>> really frees the underlying cell / breaks the cell - section alloca
On 6 May 2013, at 21:07, Randolph Maaßen wrote:
> - When a file is deleted the file system marks the block device sectors as
> free and sends the TRIM command to the SSD and the SSD really frees the
> underlying cell / breaks the cell - section allocation.
So if I'm writing a new filesystem, I
2013/5/6 Alan McKinnon
> On 06/05/2013 20:36, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote:
> > On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 07:34:20PM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> >> emm - no. Wear leveling does not need any spare blocks. A lot of drives
> >> do have spare blocks, but those are never the same size of the or
On 06/05/2013 20:36, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 07:34:20PM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>> emm - no. Wear leveling does not need any spare blocks. A lot of drives
>> do have spare blocks, but those are never the same size of the original
>> size (at least not on d
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 07:34:20PM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> emm - no. Wear leveling does not need any spare blocks. A lot of drives
> do have spare blocks, but those are never the same size of the original
> size (at least not on drives you can buy for a sensible amount of
> money). Mo
Am 06.05.2013 13:00, schrieb Hinnerk van Bruinehsen:
> On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 07:50:52AM +0100, Stroller wrote:
>> On 5 May 2013, at 17:16, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote:
>>> ... The data on a SSD is not
>>> necessarily stored linar so it's not said that a new partition is using
>>> the same memory
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Randolph Maaßen wrote:
> I'm so damn lucky
>
> I dd'ed the SSD onto an external drive and worked at first on the image with
> qemu. A simple recreation of the partition brought the system back to live
> on the image. I tried the same on the real machine and Gentoo w
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 07:50:52AM +0100, Stroller wrote:
>
> On 5 May 2013, at 17:16, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote:
> > ... The data on a SSD is not
> > necessarily stored linar so it's not said that a new partition is using
> > the same memory cells as the old one.
> > …
> > For a HDD I'd advis
On 5 May 2013, at 17:16, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote:
> ... The data on a SSD is not
> necessarily stored linar so it's not said that a new partition is using
> the same memory cells as the old one.
> …
> For a HDD I'd advise to create a copy
> using dd but from my understanding of SSD technolog
Gregory Shearman wrote:
> In linux.gentoo.user, Dale wrote:
>> Randolph Maaßen wrote:
>>> I'm so damn lucky
>>>
>>> I dd'ed the SSD onto an external drive and worked at first on the
>>> image with qemu. A simple recreation of the partition brought the
>>> system back to live on the image. I tried t
In linux.gentoo.user, Dale wrote:
> Randolph Maaßen wrote:
>>
>> I'm so damn lucky
>>
>> I dd'ed the SSD onto an external drive and worked at first on the
>> image with qemu. A simple recreation of the partition brought the
>> system back to live on the image. I tried the same on the real machine
>
Randolph Maaßen wrote:
>
>
> I'm so damn lucky
>
> I dd'ed the SSD onto an external drive and worked at first on the
> image with qemu. A simple recreation of the partition brought the
> system back to live on the image. I tried the same on the real machine
> and Gentoo works again.
>
>
> --
> Mit
2013/5/5 Randolph Maaßen
> 2013/5/5 Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
>
>> On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 02:44:11PM +, Randolph Maaßen wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I have a SSD in my laptop and I am running Win7 and Gentoo in Parralel.
>> for
>> > some purpose I needed several Partitions so my base system was l
2013/5/5 Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
> On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 02:44:11PM +, Randolph Maaßen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a SSD in my laptop and I am running Win7 and Gentoo in Parralel.
> for
> > some purpose I needed several Partitions so my base system was lying on
> > sda10, on an LVM-PV. Tod
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 02:44:11PM +, Randolph Maaßen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a SSD in my laptop and I am running Win7 and Gentoo in Parralel. for
> some purpose I needed several Partitions so my base system was lying on
> sda10, on an LVM-PV. Today my Windows refused to start and during recov
Am 05.05.2013 16:44, schrieb Randolph Maaßen:
> Hi,
>
> I have a SSD in my laptop and I am running Win7 and Gentoo in
> Parralel. for some purpose I needed several Partitions so my base
> system was lying on sda10, on an LVM-PV. Today my Windows refused to
> start and during recovery its diskpart m
On 05/05/2013 16:44, Randolph Maaßen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a SSD in my laptop and I am running Win7 and Gentoo in Parralel.
> for some purpose I needed several Partitions so my base system was lying
> on sda10, on an LVM-PV. Today my Windows refused to start and during
> recovery its diskpart mu
Hi,
I have a SSD in my laptop and I am running Win7 and Gentoo in Parralel. for
some purpose I needed several Partitions so my base system was lying on
sda10, on an LVM-PV. Today my Windows refused to start and during recovery
its diskpart must have deleted the information about the 10th partition
19 matches
Mail list logo
