On Wednesday 08 April 2009, Patrick Holthaus wrote:
> Note to self: Always search bugzilla first:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263454
Thanks Patrick, I should do the same! ;-)
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 23:42:11 Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 04 April 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Saturday 04 April 2009 21:36:00 Dale wrote:
> > > Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:41:53 +0100, Mick wrote:
> > > >> Second computer with the same symptoms ... this is not machin
Note to self: Always search bugzilla first:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263454
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Saturday 04 April 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Saturday 04 April 2009 21:36:00 Dale wrote:
> > Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > > On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:41:53 +0100, Mick wrote:
> > >> Second computer with the same symptoms ... this is not machine
> > >> specific. Anyone else come across this problem?
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 21:50:51 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > I am sitting on the toilet with your article before me. Soon it will
> > be behind me.
> Brilliant fortune! And I know just the manager who's email is gonna get
> the fortune appended to the end of every reply...
I think it is a Winst
On Saturday 04 April 2009 21:36:00 Dale wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:41:53 +0100, Mick wrote:
> >> Second computer with the same symptoms ... this is not machine
> >> specific. Anyone else come across this problem?
> >
> > I rarely use kgpg, but I just checked and mine is
On Saturday 04 April 2009 21:28:41 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Neil Bothwick
>
> I am sitting on the toilet with your article before me. Soon it will be
> behind me.
OK, OK, I know this is so completely and totally OT. But I don't care, and
I've been around here long enough to get away with it:
Bri
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:41:53 +0100, Mick wrote:
>
>
>> Second computer with the same symptoms ... this is not machine
>> specific. Anyone else come across this problem?
>>
>
> I rarely use kgpg, but I just checked and mine is the same.
>
>
>
I looked at mine a whil
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:41:53 +0100, Mick wrote:
> Second computer with the same symptoms ... this is not machine
> specific. Anyone else come across this problem?
I rarely use kgpg, but I just checked and mine is the same.
--
Neil Bothwick
I am sitting on the toilet with your article before me
On Monday 30 March 2009, Mick wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I just noticed today that my kgpg 1.2.2 (using KDE 3.5.9) is not showing
> the email addresses of the public keys contained in it - i.e. the names are
> blank. User IDs and signature email addresses are shown fine when one
> expands the tree.
>
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
