Re: [gentoo-user] Re: E17 and package.use

2010-11-21 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:24 on Sunday 21 November 2010, Mick did opine thusly: > On Sunday 21 November 2010 15:05:52 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Apparently, though unproven, at 16:35 on Sunday 21 November 2010, Mick > > did > > > > opine thusly: > > > On Sunday 21 November 2010 13:03:48 A

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: E17 and package.use

2010-11-21 Thread Mick
On Sunday 21 November 2010 15:05:52 Alan McKinnon wrote: > Apparently, though unproven, at 16:35 on Sunday 21 November 2010, Mick did > > opine thusly: > > On Sunday 21 November 2010 13:03:48 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > I think you are trying to use the ebuilds too soon. Maybe stick with > > > efl

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: E17 and package.use

2010-11-21 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:35 on Sunday 21 November 2010, Mick did opine thusly: > On Sunday 21 November 2010 13:03:48 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > I think you are trying to use the ebuilds too soon. Maybe stick with efl > > a bit longer. > > Thank you Alan, much appreciated. I'll stay with

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: E17 and package.use

2010-11-21 Thread Mick
On Sunday 21 November 2010 13:03:48 Alan McKinnon wrote: > I think you are trying to use the ebuilds too soon. Maybe stick with efl a > bit longer. Thank you Alan, much appreciated. I'll stay with efl for now. It was just that the statement of the dev in the link you posted, which suggested we

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: E17 and package.use

2010-11-21 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 14:40 on Sunday 21 November 2010, Mick did opine thusly: > On Sunday 21 November 2010 09:34:00 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > I think it's just different maintainers. The newest stuff was committed > > to the tree after the work was done on the efl overlay, and the > > m

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: E17 and package.use

2010-11-21 Thread Mick
On Sunday 21 November 2010 09:34:00 Alan McKinnon wrote: > I think it's just different maintainers. The newest stuff was committed to > the tree after the work was done on the efl overlay, and the maintainer of > the enlightenment overlay just hasn't got round to it yet I see, thanks. Last confu

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: E17 and package.use

2010-11-21 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 11:13 on Sunday 21 November 2010, Mick did opine thusly: > I've added 'enlightenment' overlay, sync'ed and now I get this: > === > $ eix -l eina > [I] dev-libs/eina > Available versions: > ~ 1.0.0_bet

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: E17 and package.use

2010-11-21 Thread Mick
On Saturday 20 November 2010 21:01:51 Alan McKinnon wrote: > Apparently, though unproven, at 20:12 on Saturday 20 November 2010, walt > did > > opine thusly: > > On 11/19/2010 03:46 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > Been using e17 for years :-) > > > > But you use kde too, right? How do you choose

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: E17 and package.use

2010-11-20 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 20:12 on Saturday 20 November 2010, walt did opine thusly: > On 11/19/2010 03:46 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Been using e17 for years :-) > > But you use kde too, right? How do you choose which one to use today? Until about a year ago I primarily used e17 but a

[gentoo-user] Re: E17 and package.use

2010-11-20 Thread walt
On 11/19/2010 03:46 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: Been using e17 for years :-) But you use kde too, right? How do you choose which one to use today?